Re: [sympy] Faster symbolics

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022, at 5:11 AM, Alan Bromborsky wrote: > For speed up how about parallel processing?  Looking at Ryzen processors > 16 cores and 32 threads are quite affordable these days.  Is parallel > python mature code these days? > > On 4/18/22 11:45 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: &g

Re: [sympy] Faster symbolics

Hi, I am CCing the symengine list also. Let me say a few words about the design and goals of SymEngine. It's a result of many years of experience with SymPy and implementing high performance code in general. The goal is the fastest possible symbolic manipulation. So we do not want to introduce

Re: [sympy] Asking for reviews/help on Prs

Hi Anderson, I am sorry it takes so long to review PRs. I would say don't be afraid to ping people more often, perhaps after a week or so of no response. Ondrej On Thu, Mar 3, 2022, at 7:48 AM, Anderson Bhat wrote: > Hello developers, > > As pointed out in the issues page by Oscar and

Re: [sympy] We are Using sympy !

Hi Dominique, On Tue, Jul 20, 2021, at 5:20 PM, nimdanor wrote: > > Hello, > we are using sympy in platon to teach Math. > > platon: https://documentationpl.readthedocs.io/fr/latest/ > the site is in french for now. > > Sympy is the perfect tool for us, every subject for under graduate and

Re: [sympy] Re: Maintainership of mpmath

If we use semantic versioning for mpmath, then on the sympy side we would just depend on a given major version of mpmath. On the mpmath side we would ensure that sympy works when we make a new release. On Thu, Sep 10, 2020, at 1:21 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > I'm in favor of seeing mpmath move

Re: [sympy] sympy.org is down

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, at 9:48 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > Hi, > > Currently https://www.sympy.org/ is down. > > Does anyone know how to fix this: > > https://github.com/sympy/sympy.github.com/issues/142 It's now fixed (thanks Isuru and Nikhil!), see the issue for more deta

[sympy] sympy.org is down

Hi, Currently https://www.sympy.org/ is down. Does anyone know how to fix this: https://github.com/sympy/sympy.github.com/issues/142 I checked all the configuration I can think of and it seems ok. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy"

Re: [sympy] SymPy presentation at Global Virtual SageDays 109, May 27-29?

Hi Matthias, On Fri, May 29, 2020, at 3:16 PM, Matthias Köppe wrote: > Hi Ondrej, > > On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 10:04:22 PM UTC-7, ondrej wrote:On Thu, > May 28, 2020, at 5:00 PM, Matthias Köppe wrote: > > > On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-7, ondrej wrote:> Wondering > > > if a

Re: [sympy] SymPy presentation at Global Virtual SageDays 109, May 27-29?

On Thu, May 28, 2020, at 5:00 PM, Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-7, ondrej wrote:> Wondering > if a SymPy developer who was involved in the recent > > > development would be interested in giving a presentation on what is new > > > in SymPy 1.6. The main

Re: [sympy] SymPy presentation at Global Virtual SageDays 109, May 27-29?

Hi Matthias, On Sun, May 24, 2020, at 6:14 PM, Matthias Köppe wrote: > This coming week we run Global Virtual SageDays 109 > (https://wiki.sagemath.org/days109), an event for the SageMath user and > developer community on the occasion of the release of SageMath 9.1. > > Wondering if a SymPy

Re: [sympy] Request a permission to use sympy in an open source project

Hi Aziz, On Sun, Apr 5, 2020, at 10:31 PM, Aziz wrote: > Dear Sympy Development Team, > > I want to get a permission from Sympy to use their API in FormulaLab > . FormulaLab is a new > growing open source (MIT license) python package that derive,

Re: [sympy] Re: [Discussion] [GSoC] Creating a Java Parser

t;> But, I would like to let you know that it is necessary for me to first get > >> approval from you and my current potential mentor Nikhil in this regard, > >> since I am participating for the first time and I might have > >> underestimated the time t

Re: [sympy] GSoC ideas regarding SymPy / Fortran integration

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020, at 6:46 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:58 PM Ondřej Čertík wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020, at 4:47 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:19 PM Ondřej Čertík wrote: > > &g

Re: [sympy] Re: Useful GSoC Idea

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020, at 10:29 AM, Jackson Morris wrote: > Ah, I posted the link in the Gitter chat last night, but should have > also poster here: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cYyk2beU8d4XLtBV_Z-j7XLUpF4JOgROv1mHEcB1_rc/edit?usp=sharing > any feedback would be greatly appreciated!

Re: [sympy] Re: Useful GSoC Idea

gt; >> > and then implementing such an extension to either of these methods. If > > >> > it proves intractable to improve either of these methods we would then > > >> > look into a look-up table? Would it be unrealistic to try to implement > > >> > othe

Re: [sympy] GSoC ideas regarding SymPy / Fortran integration

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020, at 4:47 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:19 PM Ondřej Čertík wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am looking for students again this year for any related ideas: > > > > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2020-Ideas#

[sympy] GSoC ideas regarding SymPy / Fortran integration

Hi, I am looking for students again this year for any related ideas: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2020-Ideas#sympy---fortran-code-generation-and-jit The ideas are from last year, and we made good progress on them last year. There is plenty still to do. Here are some ideas in random

Re: [sympy] GSOC applicants sending off-list emails

I think we all agree the discussion should happen at the mailinglist, as opposed in private emails. Only if nobody responds at the list, I think it is ok for the student to email a mentor privately, asking him to respond at the list. Regarding the mailinglist introductions, maybe we can simply

Re: [sympy] Re: [Discussion] [GSoC] Creating a Java Parser

Hi Gajjar, I read through your proposal. It looks good overall. I would suggest to spend more time on the C side than Java, I think C would be very useful for a lot of people. I don't know how many Java users are there that would use the Java backend. Also, if you are interested at all to

Re: [sympy] Re: Useful GSoC Idea

Hi Jackson and Oscar, Indeed, fixing this would be the main goal of the project. Let's brainstorm the possible approaches. 1) One is to work on the integrate() function, and make it return distributions (delta functions) where appropriate. One way to do that is using pattern matching, similar

[sympy] Useful GSoC Idea

Hi, Here is a great idea for a GSoC project: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/2803#issuecomment-604697523 Would any student be interested? I know at least one user who couldn't use SymPy because of that. So fixing it would be very useful to a lot of people. The scope of the GSoC project

Re: [sympy] Grim expressions

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019, at 3:56 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > Hi Fredrik, > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019, at 12:00 PM, Fredrik Johansson wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > First off, congratulations to the SymPy community for version 1.5! > > > > I'm interested in feedb

Re: [sympy] Grim expressions

Hi Fredrik, On Mon, Dec 16, 2019, at 12:00 PM, Fredrik Johansson wrote: > Hi all, > > First off, congratulations to the SymPy community for version 1.5! > > I'm interested in feedback about the symbolic formula language I'm > developing for Fungrim (http://fungrim.org/). > > I have a draft

Re: [sympy] Re: [ANN] The development of GAlgebra now officially moves to pygae/galgebra

Hi Utensil, Thanks for letting us know! It's very nice to see the development of GAlgebra being picked up. Ondrej On Sat, Nov 30, 2019, at 12:01 AM, Utensil Song wrote: > More background: > > * https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/ILzDtdNd83A/FZ-9ys6PBAAJ > *

Re: [sympy] Symbolic integrator using a neural network

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019, at 12:48 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > There's a review paper for ICLR 2020 on training a neural network to > do symbolic integration. They claim that it outperforms Mathematica by > a large margin. Machine learning papers can sometimes make overzealous > claims, so scepticism is

Re: [sympy] ANN: decision tree for RUBI integration rules

Hi Francesco, On Sun, Sep 15, 2019, at 9:53 AM, Francesco Bonazzi wrote: > I have created a decision tree out of RUBI's (Rule-based integration) > decision trees. You can find the code here: > > https://github.com/Upabjojr/rubi_generated > > The code misses some integrals and sometimes gives

Re: [sympy] Re: Google Season of Docs Participants Announced

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, at 10:49 AM, Jason Moore wrote: > > I don't know that for sure, so maybe there is some way we could measure > > that. > > This is something Lauren could do, a proper survey to solicit feedback > on docstrings/documentation from users would really help. Right now we >

Re: [sympy] Re: Google Season of Docs Participants Announced

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, at 8:32 AM, Fredrik Johansson wrote: > On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 8:59:23 AM UTC+2, Aaron Meurer wrote:On > Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:39 PM Ondřej Čertík wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, at 7:47 PM, Aaro

Re: [sympy] Re: Google Season of Docs Participants Announced

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, at 7:47 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > A possible middle ground would be to print the definition as a SymPy > expression. The docstrings in the ODE module use the ODE module to > pretty print the general solution > https://docs.sympy.org/latest/modules/solvers/ode.html

Re: [sympy] Re: Google Season of Docs Participants Announced

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, at 9:03 AM, Jason Moore wrote: > Yes and I moved it to the notes section in the example. I de-emphasized > the "complex mathematical expression" written in latex because It is > unhelpful in plaintext. Here is another idea that I had recently, which might be a nice

Re: [sympy] Re: Interested to participate in GSoD

google.com/document/d/1QIw9Gz_nKCp5I_GV6uYLnQmOW6MftbvW-yljUHzGY08/edit?usp=sharing>. > Please have a look and suggest/comment on it. I have filled the GSoD form as > well. > > -- > Thanks and regards, > Abhijith > MS, Computer Science and Engineering, > Purdue University, USA > &

Re: [sympy] Re: Interested to participate in GSoD

gine (so we need a documentation processing tool for Cpp > like Doxygen). > > Please let me know your thoughts on this. > > P.S.: I see that today is deadline. I just filled the the GSoD form for this > project. > > Thanks and regards, > Abhijith >

[sympy] Re: Interested to participate in GSoD

Yes, I would prefer something based on Markdown like mkdocs. On Thu, Jun 27, 2019, at 8:40 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > You may want to post this to the SymEngine mailing list as well > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/symengine > > Also be aware that the deadline to apply for GSoD is July

Re: [sympy] Benchmarking CI

> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:41 AM Isuru Fernando wrote: > > > Yes, but not by default, one has to setup a bot to do that. Here is how > > > somebody already did exactly that: > > > > There's a new feature in gitlab that takes care of this. See > >

Re: [sympy] Benchmarking CI

On Mon, May 20, 2019, at 5:06 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 4:41 PM Ondřej Čertík wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019, at 4:15 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:51 PM Ondřej Čertík wrote: > > > &

Re: [sympy] Benchmarking CI

On Mon, May 20, 2019, at 4:15 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:51 PM Ondřej Čertík wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019, at 3:44 PM, Isuru Fernando wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 4:30 PM Aaron

Re: [sympy] Benchmarking CI

On Mon, May 20, 2019, at 3:44 PM, Isuru Fernando wrote: > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 4:30 PM Aaron Meurer wrote: > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 2:45 PM Isuru Fernando wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:34 PM Aaron Meurer wrote: > > >> > > >> Thanks. My biggest question

Re: [sympy] Interested in working on SymPy's quantum physics module

Hi Tilman, Yes, I am available to help. You should think if you'd be interested in becoming the maintainer of the module down the road. Ondrej On Mon, May 20, 2019, at 12:35 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > Hi Tilman. > > You're definitely welcome to contribute. As Oscar noted, one of the > biggest

Re: [sympy] Blog post about SymPy 1.4

On Thu, May 2, 2019, at 11:57 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > I have written a post on my blog about some of the new features in > SymPy 1.4. https://www.asmeurer.com/blog/posts/whats-new-in-sympy-14/ > The post is also cross posted to the Quansight Labs blog >

Re: [sympy] SymPy - a suggestion

Hi David, On Wed, May 1, 2019, at 11:47 AM, David Bailey wrote: > Hello, > > I used to work as an independent Mathematica consultant, and as such > have a detailed familiarity with their Notebook mechanism. In my > opinion Mathematica notebooks made Mathematica stand out - being able > to

Re: [sympy] Implement solvers for symengine

Try to put more details into the timeline, and the section where you describe what you want to implement. Also, submit the proposal now, you can still edit it afterwards. When we review proposals, the patches are very important to show your skills, so I suggest you do the modifications above,

Re: [sympy] Guidance for parsing fortran code to sympy project

Hi Shreya, I haven't seen the draft of your proposal. If you have anything, please submit directly to the gsoc website. Also, please submit your patch by the deadline tomorrow. Ondrej On Wed, Apr 3, 2019, at 10:32 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > Perfect, thank you. The deadline is April 9 and

Re: [sympy] GSOC 2019 Idea: Python/C Parser for sympy

Perfect. We'll discuss the PR at github. Regarding your application, it's time to submit it now. On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, at 12:22 AM, Nikhil Maan wrote: > > > On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 11:29:06 PM UTC+5:30, Ondřej Čertík wrote:Hi > Nikhil, > > > > Thanks. I lef

Re: [sympy] Implement solvers for symengine

Thanks for the PR. I think the first step would be to extend sympy.core.backend to work with solvers and ensure sympy tests pass with symengine on. That way one is using symengine instead of sympy.core, but sympy solvers would still be used. The next step would be to rewrite some of the

Re: [sympy] Implement solvers for symengine

Per instructions, you have to have at least one PR submitted by April 9. https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2019-Application-Template#patch-requirement Ondrej On Sat, Apr 6, 2019, at 12:31 PM, brijesh vora wrote: > I was thinking of implementing algebraic and ode solvers. I will upload

Re: [sympy] Implement solvers for symengine

Yes, we would like to see such a proposal. Can you write up in details which solvers, what algorithms etc? Also don't forget about the patch requirement. On Sat, Apr 6, 2019, at 8:30 AM, brijesh vora wrote: > Hi, > what is the status of this project- Implement solvers for symengine > > I was

Re: [sympy] Guidance for parsing fortran code to sympy project

mit > patches and send you link of pr's by today > > On Thu, 4 Apr 2019, 00:05 Ondřej Čertík, wrote: > > Hi Shreya, > > > > Any updates? > > > > Once you submit a patch, please ping me, so that we can review it. Also > > once you have a draft of

Re: [sympy] Guidance for parsing fortran code to sympy project

Hi Shreya, Any updates? Once you submit a patch, please ping me, so that we can review it. Also once you have a draft of the proposal, please send it too, so that we can iterate on it. Ondrej On Sat, Mar 23, 2019, at 9:03 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > > Then make sure you submit a patc

Re: [sympy] GSoC19: General Relativity with SymPy

Hi Fotios, On Wed, Apr 3, 2019, at 10:15 AM, bpapapet...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > My name is Fotios Anagnostopoulos and I am a Phd student at National > and Kapodistrian Uni. of Athens,Greece. > My field is Cosmology and Modified Theories of Gravity (i. e >

Re: [sympy] GSOC 2019 Idea: Python/C Parser for sympy

Hi Nikhil, Thanks. I left there some comments. I will give more feedback soon. Ping me once you submit a patch, that is now the highest priority. Ondrej On Wed, Apr 3, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Nikhil Maan wrote: > > > On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 2:51:30 AM UTC+5:30, Ondřej Čer

Re: [sympy] SymPy 1.4 release candidate 1 ready for testing

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, at 9:44 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > The SymPy 1.4 release candidate 1 is ready for testing. Please > download it and let us know if you have any issues. > > The release can be downloaded from > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/releases/tag/sympy-1.4rc1. > > The release notes

Re: [sympy] Introduction

Hi Dmytro, On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, at 2:33 AM, dmytr...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello. > > My name is Dmytro Kozii. I am a computer science undergraduate student > from Lviv Polytechnic National University. I have 2 years of working > experience with python. During this term, I developed face

Re: [sympy] GSOC 2019 Idea: Python/C Parser for sympy

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, at 10:10 PM, Nikhil Maan wrote: > > > On Saturday, March 30, 2019 at 4:33:19 AM UTC+5:30, Ondřej Čertík > wrote:Hi Nikhil, > > > > Also please do not forget about the patches for SymPy. > > > > Ondrej > > Dear Ondrej,

Re: [sympy] SymPy 1.4 release candidate 1 ready for testing

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, at 9:44 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > The SymPy 1.4 release candidate 1 is ready for testing. Please > download it and let us know if you have any issues. > > The release can be downloaded from > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/releases/tag/sympy-1.4rc1. > > The release notes

Re: [sympy] GSOC 2019 Idea: Python/C Parser for sympy

Hi Nikhil, On Fri, Mar 29, 2019, at 3:41 PM, Nikhil Maan wrote: > > > On Thursday, March 28, 2019 at 11:37:00 PM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer > wrote:On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:51 PM Nikhil Maan > wrote: > > > > > Hello Ondrej, > > > > > > Thank you for showing interest in my project. It will

Re: [sympy] GSOC 2019 Idea: Python/C Parser for sympy

Hi Nikhil, > Hello Ondrej, > > Thank you for showing interest in my project. It will be an honor to > work with you on this project. > > I would love to include parsing Fortran in the proposal. I would like > to help as much as I can. Sympy has made doing mathematics so much > convenient,

Re: [sympy] GSOC 2019 Idea: Python/C Parser for sympy

Hi Nikhil, On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, at 5:39 PM, Nikhil Maan wrote: > Hello everyone, > > My name is Nikhil Maan and I am a sophomore at Amity University, India > as a CSE major. > I have a few years of experience with C/C++; that makes me relatively > new to python. What I love the most about

Re: [sympy] GSoC ideas regarding Fortran (code generation, parsing, ...)

, at 3:58 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > Hi, > > I just open sourced LFortran, an interactive Fortran compiler: > https://gitlab.com/lfortran/lfortran. > > I worked on it for about 1.5 years, and I am very excited about it. It > allows Fortran to be used in a Jupyter not

Re: [sympy] Guidance for parsing fortran code to sympy project

> Then make sure you submit a patch more more to SymPy. Since your Meant to say: submit a patch or more to SymPy. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [sympy] Guidance for parsing fortran code to sympy project

Hi Shreya, On Sat, Mar 23, 2019, at 12:42 AM, Shreya Joshi wrote: > My name is Shreya Joshi, I am currently pursuing Bachelor of > Engineering with Computer Science and Engineering as my Major. I am in > the last semester of my studies. I would like to apply for :- > Parsing fortran code to

Re: [sympy] GSOC 19: Code Generation

Hi Ankit, Besides what Aaron wrote, here are project ideas regarding code generation and Fortran that I would be very interested in: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/Oe5IlRXgXi0/CBAwGgBfAgAJ If you are interested, let me know. Ondrej On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, at 7:27 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:

[sympy] GSoC ideas regarding Fortran (code generation, parsing, ...)

Hi, I just open sourced LFortran, an interactive Fortran compiler: https://gitlab.com/lfortran/lfortran. I worked on it for about 1.5 years, and I am very excited about it. It allows Fortran to be used in a Jupyter notebook (demo:

Re: [sympy] Interest in advanced physics libraries?

Hi Nicholas, On Sun, Dec 2, 2018, at 4:01 PM, Nicholas Ondo wrote: > So I'm a former theoretical physicist, and I am interested in writing a > library that will implement important functionality needed for formal > HEP physics/gravitational physics research. There's loads of > calculations I

Re: [sympy] Re: Autolev Parser

On Mon, May 21, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > Hi Nikhil, > > Thanks for the answer. If I understand your points correctly, your main > points are: > > * Nobody would want to rewrite the parser > * Autolev language is simple enough, so AST is not worth the add

Re: [sympy] Re: Autolev Parser

for the grammar, essentially every rule should be tested by tests. So that if we switch to AST later, we can be sure that we didn't break anything. Ondrej On Fri, May 18, 2018, at 10:39 AM, Nikhil Pappu wrote: > > > On Friday, May 18, 2018 at 4:08:29 PM UTC+5:30, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > > >

Re: [sympy] Re: Autolev Parser

On Fri, May 18, 2018, at 1:32 AM, Nikhil Pappu wrote: > Ondřej, Jason, > > I have written my first blog post discussing the > project details and status. > Can you please go over it and provide feedback? I think overall it looks very good. It looks like you got a good

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2018 Project - Autolev Parser (using ANTLR 4)

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018, at 6:41 AM, Nikhil Pappu wrote: > Hi, > > I am a sophomore in Computer Science and Engineering at the International > Institute of Information Technology Bangalore and > a theoretical computer science and applied math enthusiast. > > I am well versed in Python. I am

Re: [sympy] NumFOCUS End-of-Year Fundraising Drive (SymPy fiscal sponsor)

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Gina Helfrich wrote: > Hi folks, > > NumFOCUS, the nonprofit that provides fiscal sponsorship for SymPy, kicks > off our end of year fundraising drive officially on Monday and would > really > appreciate your support! > > Andy Terrel, NumFOCUS Board

[sympy] Re: mpmath 1.0

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017, at 01:10 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > That's a great blog post Fredrik. Since your blog doesn't seem to have > a comments box, I will add my comments here. > > One thing I would add to the mpmath history is the SymPy 1.0 release > (March 2016), which officially made mpmath an

Re: [sympy] Unexpected truncation to integer when using evalf()

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017, at 08:22 AM, Jeremie Knuesel wrote: > Done, thanks. Here is the issue for reference: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/13365 Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [sympy] Compiling SYMPY: NUITKA

Hi Jeremy, On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:15 AM, Yirmeyahu Kaminski wrote: > Hi all, > > SYMPY is a fantastic tool, but it is definitely slow. Did someone try to > compile it? Using for example NUITKA? In order to get as fast library as possible, we have developed the SymEngine

Re: [sympy] A submodule on Quaternions

Hi Nikhil, On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Nikhil Pappu wrote: > I was able to find some support for Quaternion Rotation in the Vector module > but I did not come across a general submodule on Quaternions which allows > users to define them and work with them. > I would like

Re: [sympy] Hanging search function of docs.sympy.org (firefox, chromium)

Hi Carsten, On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:56 AM, Carsten Knoll wrote: > Hi all, > > > a colleague just indicated to me that they are not able to perform a > search on with firefox on Windows 8. IE works. > > I can reproduce this on Debian with FF (52.2.0

Re: [sympy] Python 3.6 tests depending on external library

On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Francesco Bonazzi <franz.bona...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Saturday, 15 July 2017 10:29:23 UTC-4, Ondřej Čertík wrote: >> >> Hi Arihant, >> >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Arihant Parsoya >> >> If s

Re: [sympy] Python 3.6 tests depending on external library

Hi Arihant, On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Arihant Parsoya wrote: > Hi Aaron and Francesco, > > I converted most code of MatchPy to python 2. However, MatchPy has > dependency on few other python3.6 libraries(such as typing). Backport > version of those libraries is

Re: [sympy] Re: SymPy 1.1 is released

Thank you NumFOCUS and thank you Aaron for making this happen! Ondrej On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > Oh, I almost forgot something very important. A huge thanks to > NumFOCUS for providing funding for me to do this release. Without it, > we would not

Re: [sympy] SymPy 1.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing

Hi Aaron, On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > Hello everyone. > > I'm pleased to announce that the first release candidate for SymPy 1.1 > is now ready for testing. It can be downloaded from > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/releases/tag/sympy-1.1rc1. > >

Re: [sympy] Request for community input: removing versioned docs

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > Hello all. > > I would like input from the broader SymPy community here. Right now, > at http://docs.sympy.org/ we have versioned docs for each version > going back to 0.6.7, e.g., http://docs.sympy.org/0.7.3/index.html. >

Re: [sympy] SymPy release

I want to help with the release automation. Can you share the PR where I can help? Ondrej On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > I hope so, but it won't be out for long. It would definitely be > helpful if downstream projects checked against master now. > >

Re: [sympy] Sympy tensors for symbolic manipulation of quantum chemistry integrals

Hi Rick, On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Rick Muller wrote: > Ondrej, > > (Apologies for the length...) > > Here's my larger plan. It's strictly a night-and-weekends thing, but I'd be > interested in working with you (or anyone else here) who thinks this is fun. > > I'd like

Re: [sympy] Sympy tensors for symbolic manipulation of quantum chemistry integrals

Hi Rick, On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Rick Muller wrote: > I was hoping that someone could give me some help getting started with the > sympy tensor objects. I'd like to define symbolic objects to represent one- > and two-electron integrals in quantum chemistry with the

Re: [sympy] New SymPy Project -- PyTuning

csound/blob/6d8779dc884f79d6aa43a21f163e36bc67c3c411/Opcodes/repluck.c It seems both this code, as well as Karplus-Strong, is not really solving the physical equation, it's just a good sounding model. Ondrej > > On Thursday, April 6, 2017 at 12:55:06 PM UTC-4, Ondřej Čertík wrote: >

Re: [sympy] New SymPy Project -- PyTuning

Hi Mark, Very nice project, thanks for sharing. Music theory is indeed very interesting. I was recently playing with a numerical solver for guitar strings: https://gitlab.com/certik/stringsim But I didn't have time to finish it yet. I was going to use sympy for the method of manufactured

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC project idea: Integration of homogeneous functions over polytopes

are able to > view both our proposals on the Google site ? > > --Regards, > Arif Ahmed > > On Tuesday, April 4, 2017 at 2:44:47 AM UTC+5:30, Ondřej Čertík wrote: >> >> Arif, Vedarth, >> >> Please make sure you submit your proposal. Try to do your best &g

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC project idea: Integration of homogeneous functions over polytopes

s it necessary to add this content to the SymPy wiki ? > > > On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 3:56:11 AM UTC+5:30, Ondřej Čertík wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Here is another GSoC idea from my collaborator at UC Davis, prof. >> Sukumar [1]. His student Eric Chin gave me

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC Idea: Rubi integrator

d the work, so that both projects are complementary. Ondrej > > Abdullah Javed Nesar > > On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 3:33:04 AM UTC+5:30, Ondřej Čertík wrote: >> >> Hi Abdullah, >> >> I read through your proposal, do I understand it correctly, that in >> th

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC project idea: Integration of homogeneous functions over polytopes

guide me? > > > On Thursday, 30 March 2017 03:56:11 UTC+5:30, Ondřej Čertík wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Here is another GSoC idea from my collaborator at UC Davis, prof. >> Sukumar [1]. His student Eric Chin gave me his permission to post the >> project here, see the at

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC Idea: Rubi integrator

Hi Abdullah, I read through your proposal, do I understand it correctly, that in the first part of the project you want to use our current pattern matching (or possibly improve it if needed) to represent the Rubi rules, and that by itself should work? And then in the second part of your project

[sympy] GSoC Idea: Rubi integrator

Hi, Here is a project that I would love to see happen: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/12233 I am available to mentor it, and I think quite a few people are excited about it and such a system/framework (i.e. set of rules for patter matching + compiler to generate a fast if/then/else

Re: [sympy] SymPy was accepted as a GSoC org

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Gaurav Dhingra wrote: > I've been thinking about applying again, though I am not sure what the > project should be. Are there any good algorithms that are not implemented > that could make a good project (I've read the ideas page)? I

Re: [sympy] Merging back Kirpichev's fixes?

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Francesco Bonazzi wrote: > Sergey wrote me that we should feel free to port anything from diofant > provided that we keep the copyright notice and obey to the LICENSE terms. I updated #10531 accordingly:

Re: [sympy] Merging back Kirpichev's fixes?

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > To be completely honest I don't know who is right here. What does the "SymPy > Development Team" in the license refer to? If, as Francesco suggests, it > refers to the AUTHORS file, then I think we were wrong to accept

Re: [sympy] Merging back Kirpichev's fixes?

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Francesco Bonazzi <franz.bona...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Monday, 6 February 2017 18:09:42 UTC+1, Ondřej Čertík wrote: >> >> >> > >> > What do you think? Shall we edit our LICENSE file to include Sergey >>

Re: [sympy] Merging back Kirpichev's fixes?

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Francesco Bonazzi wrote: > As you all know, Sergey Kirpichev left this community and is working on a > fork of SymPy of his own. > > https://github.com/diofant/diofant > > He keeps fixing bugs and/or adding new features, as well as keeping

Re: [sympy] Re: Doing a release

Hi Robert, On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:43 AM, wrote: > FYI, I found more details on how GitLab currently proceeds (and reasons why) > at > https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/changelog.md > . > > (You could have a Python equivalent of

Re: [sympy] NumFOCUS Summit

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Jason Moore wrote: > I just noticed that there was a NumFOCUS summit: > > http://www.numfocus.org/blog/numfocus-summit-2016 > > Too bad we didn't have a rep there. We should keep an eye out for next time. I knew about it, my apologies for

Re: [sympy] Generating PDF or Printing (with real printer)

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > I would ask the Jupyter guys about this, or on stack overflow. I think > in the worst case you may need to export to latex and edit the file > manually to wrap the expressions. Johannes, if you figure it out, please let

Re: [sympy] Re: Idea for PR reviewing

gt;> So now it's impossible to merge your own PR (someone else has to review it >> first). Hopefully this doesn't become an issue. If you need me to review >> your PR, feel free to ping me on Gitter. >> >> Aaron Meurer >> >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:33 PM, O

Re: [sympy] Re: Idea for PR reviewing

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Ondřej Čertík <ondrej.cer...@gmail.com> wrote: > GitHub reached out to me again, that they fixed it. Indeed, it seems > to be fixed, so I have enabled the "require review", even for > administrators. Now if you want to merge a PR, just clic

Re: [sympy] Re: Idea for PR reviewing

gt; > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Aaron Meurer <asmeu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Maybe it means someone other than the merger has to review it. >> >> Aaron Meurer >> >> >> On Thursday, September 15, 2016, Ondřej Čertík <ondrej.cer...@gmail.com> >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >