On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 6:44 PM Aaron Meurer wrote:
> I think that shows they would also help design cleaner APIs. One of the
> motivations of solveset() was to give a more consistent return type
> compared to solve(). They can also help avoid type confusions like
>
I think that shows they would also help design cleaner APIs. One of the
motivations of solveset() was to give a more consistent return type
compared to solve(). They can also help avoid type confusions like
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/16362
On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 23:09, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
>
> Once we drop Python 2.7, we should experiment with using the type annotation
> and MyPy to statically check (eventually) the whole code base. I think this
> will find bugs, improve the development experience and make it much easier to
>
On Thu, May 2, 2019, at 11:57 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> I have written a post on my blog about some of the new features in
> SymPy 1.4. https://www.asmeurer.com/blog/posts/whats-new-in-sympy-14/
> The post is also cross posted to the Quansight Labs blog
>
There is a lot of discussion about this in these issues
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/5031
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/4986
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/14741
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 7:34 AM wrote:
>
> Hello Sympy Developers and Interested People!
>
>
I have written a post on my blog about some of the new features in
SymPy 1.4. https://www.asmeurer.com/blog/posts/whats-new-in-sympy-14/
The post is also cross posted to the Quansight Labs blog
https://labs.quansight.org/blog/2019/04/whats-new-in-sympy-14/.
Aaron Meurer
--
You received this
> I should say at this point, that I use my own format for the workbook
> files - because that gives me far more freedom to add features - but if I
> can get a spec of Jupyter's output format
>
Those specs are all on the Jupyter site. Cadabra uses a very similar format
(and in fact also has
Actually I feel that sympy ‘ s algos should be available for SciPy too cause I
require to solve a bunch of differential equations but I can’t use SciPy
goodies in sympy. Therefore I have to think and resort to other methods. I wish
both libraries could like use one another’s features and your
Vinesh,
Not in the slightest - it is just that I would hate to mane the program
something that might hide the fact that it is SymPy that is doing the
calculations!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
Sorry, if my tone was a little rough. I just wanted to suggest.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: David Bailey
Sent: 02 May 2019 19:15
To: sympy
Subject: [sympy] Re: SymPy - a suggestion
Vishesh,
I certainly don't want to obscure the sense that this is SimPy - after all,
many people here
Vishesh,
I certainly don't want to obscure the sense that this is SimPy - after all,
many people here must have contributed some very sophisticated algorithms
to this project - I just want to help reveal what they have done by
clearing away some of the clutter that probably impedes poential
Hello Sympy Developers and Interested People!
First off, Thank you very much for your great effort and success - Sympy is
an absolutely awesome piece of software!
I am using it for the better of 2 years now and did some fun stuff, but I
still haven't really decided on a coherent way of writing
Just for comparison: this is part of David's example in Cadabra:
[image: cadabra_screenshot.png]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Hi David,
I tend to agree with most of your criticism of Jupyter. What do you intend
to use in order to render mathematics? In the notebook system for Cadabra
(https://cadabra.science) I went the route of feeding things through LaTeX
& dvipng and then render the resulting png, which can be
Why don’t you say it PyMath and let other thinks like scipy and numfocus also
use that?
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: David Bailey
Sent: 02 May 2019 14:43
To: sympy
Subject: [sympy] Re: SymPy - a suggestion
After more thought, I propose to call my software SymPyWorkbook because
After more thought, I propose to call my software SymPyWorkbook because
SymPyFrontend might be a bit vague for some people. I am definitely not a
fan of weird names like 'Jupyter' - they are hard to spell, and I actually
wasted some time when I first tried SymPy, looking for the notebook,
16 matches
Mail list logo
