I'm swamped with grading and class preparation, but wanted to comment
briefly on the items below:
On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 3:58:21 PM UTC-6 asme...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:44 PM Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
>
> Yes, DivideSides would make sense for unevaluated
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:44 PM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 20:24, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 6:47 AM David Bailey wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/02/2021 00:53, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 23:58, S.Y. Lee wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> And
Thank you so much, it works great now! :)
I haven't installed it. I have newest version I used to used git pull ..
Thank U
Mike
środa, 10 lutego 2021 o 22:14:07 UTC+1 Oscar napisał(a):
> Do you particularly want to use the master version of sympy from git?
>
> It's usually better to use the
Do you particularly want to use the master version of sympy from git?
It's usually better to use the latest release (currently 1.7.1) unless
you are planning to work on making changes to sympy itself.
You can install the latest release by running e.g "pip install sympy"
(or "conda install sympy"
Thanks.
I used git clone ... thats all
środa, 10 lutego 2021 o 21:53:02 UTC+1 Oscar napisał(a):
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 20:47, Michał Pawłowski
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > I have such problem.
> >
> > I've created py file:
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/python3
> >
> > from sympy import *
> > x =
Thank you for quick reply.
I'm not sure. I've input
git clone ...
Thats all.
śr., 10.02.2021, 21:53 użytkownik Oscar Benjamin
napisał:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 20:47, Michał Pawłowski
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > I have such problem.
> >
> > I've created py file:
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/python3
>
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 20:47, Michał Pawłowski
wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I have such problem.
>
> I've created py file:
>
> #!/usr/bin/python3
>
> from sympy import *
> x = Symbol('x')
> print(expand(sin(x)*(x-1)*(x+1)))
>
> When it is inside of SymPy lib dir, it returns correct result in console.
>
Hi.
I have such problem.
I've created py file:
#!/usr/bin/python3
from sympy import *
x = Symbol('x')
print(expand(sin(x)*(x-1)*(x+1)))
When it is inside of SymPy lib dir, it returns correct result in console.
But, when I put it not inside the lib dir, it tells me, that:
NameError: name
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 20:24, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 6:47 AM David Bailey wrote:
>>
>> On 10/02/2021 00:53, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 23:58, S.Y. Lee wrote:
>>
>>
>> And we would also arrive in questions like: If equation brings its own
>>
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 6:47 AM David Bailey wrote:
> On 10/02/2021 00:53, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 23:58, S.Y. Lee
> wrote:
>
>
> And we would also arrive in questions like: If equation brings its own
> algebra system, there should be an equation of equations? How
Thank you very much! :)
środa, 10 lutego 2021 o 20:22:09 UTC+1 gu...@uwosh.edu napisał(a):
> `print(expand((x**2+1)*(x-1)))`
>
> On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 1:20:38 PM UTC-6
> michal.bozyd...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Thank you. It works in this example. But if I'd like to do this:
>>
>>
`print(expand((x**2+1)*(x-1)))`
On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 1:20:38 PM UTC-6
michal.bozyd...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thank you. It works in this example. But if I'd like to do this:
>
> print((x**2+1)*(x-1))
>
> It prints me string without compute it. I'd like to have :
>
> x**3-x**2+x-1
>
>
Thank you. It works in this example. But if I'd like to do this:
print((x**2+1)*(x-1))
It prints me string without compute it. I'd like to have :
x**3-x**2+x-1
Is it possible?
Thanks Mike
środa, 10 lutego 2021 o 19:59:55 UTC+1 gu...@uwosh.edu napisał(a):
> wrap your expression in a
wrap your expression in a `print()` statement: `print(1+x+x**2+x**3)`.
On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 9:43:44 AM UTC-6
michal.bozyd...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'd like to generate code of simplified formula. I.E:
>
> When I pass: 1+x+x**2+x**3
> I'd like to have: x**3+x**2+x+1
>
> Is it
Hi Tejasvi,
This issue (https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/19591) has links to all
modules that have been updated. You can start by updating other modules to
follow the documentation style guide mentioned here :
https://docs.sympy.org/latest/documentation-style-guide.html.
Thanks,
Soumi.
Hi Aaron and Oscar,
I am Tejasvi Chebrolu, a computer science sophomore at International
Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad. I have recently been trying
to improve my technical writing skills and would like to work with SymPy as
a part of GSoD-2021. After going through the ideas on
Jason,
Thanks for clarifying things for me , I actually got confused because your
name wasn't in potential mentors list so I thought about that "good to go".
Other than looking in other dynamics packages I wanted to learn a bit
theory about Joints and JointsMethod , searching google is showing
Hi.
I'd like to generate code of simplified formula. I.E:
When I pass: 1+x+x**2+x**3
I'd like to have: x**3+x**2+x+1
Is it possible to achieve it?
Thanks
Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Sudeep,
We don't tell you what is "good to go". Every applicant can propose
whatever they want. The applications are judged on the scope, the
likelihood of success, the writer's communication, alignment with sympy's
roadmap, and their applicant's interaction with the community.
Jason
Jason,
I'll surely look into it.
So is JointsMethod good to go as GSoC project?
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, 19:15 Jason Moore, wrote:
> Sudeep,
>
> The only thing I can think of to look it is how people do this in other
> dynamics software. Many of them let the user define a system based on
>
On 10/02/2021 00:53, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 23:58, S.Y. Lee wrote:
And we would also arrive in questions like: If equation brings its own algebra
system, there should be an equation of equations? How should we solve them?
It's not an "algebra system": it's just a few
Sudeep,
The only thing I can think of to look it is how people do this in other
dynamics software. Many of them let the user define a system based on
descriptions of rigid bodies and different joint types. That description is
the used to define the mathematics of the kinematics. The software
Jason,
I went through the previous JointsMethod work, I think it would be wise to
complete the previous 2 PRs of Joint Methods because it contains some good
work and completing them would take less time rather than starting from
scratch.
Please refer a source to read more about Joints and
23 matches
Mail list logo
