Jason, I went through the previous JointsMethod work, I think it would be wise to complete the previous 2 PRs of Joint Methods because it contains some good work and completing them would take less time rather than starting from scratch. Please refer a source to read more about Joints and JointsMethod.
Sudeep Sidhu On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, 18:19 Sudeep Sidhu, <[email protected]> wrote: > Jason, > > I'm comfortable in implementing JointsMethod and it has some previous work > done too (unmerged GSoC work). All I would need is some guidance with > concepts if I get stuck somewhere and a good source to read about > JointsMethod. I have some knowledge of dynamics too so I think I can > implement it. > > Sudeep Sidhu > > On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, 15:28 Jason Moore, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I personally think completing the JointsMethod is of higher priority than >> the FeatherStone method. The JointsMethod would open up the use of the >> library to a much wider set of users because they will be able to construct >> models with less knowledge of the underlying mathematics. For example, a >> double compound pendulum could be created like this: >> >> ground = RigidBody(...) >> upper_link = RigidBody(...) >> lower_link = RigidBody(...) >> >> base_joint = PinJoin(ground, lower_link, ...) >> intermediate_joint = PinJoint(lower_link, upper_link, ...) >> >> joint_method = JointMethod((base_joint, intermediate_joint), ...) >> >> equations_of_motion = joint_method.generate_eoms(...) >> >> Jason >> moorepants.info >> +01 530-601-9791 >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAJUjCNnYjAqYz6z_sSum_-WLAGwP0FNotfSQvwxotNKcqqqs_A%40mail.gmail.com.
