About sorting: Python is made such that it automatically shifts it’s algorithm
according to list size.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Shiksha Rawat
Sent: 30 March 2019 01:30
To: sympy
Subject: Re: [sympy] Gsoc Project idea " Efficient
EquationofMotionGenerationwith Python" discussion.
Hi, I have mailed the GSoC proposal through GSoC official site but realized
after submitting that while copying from MS Word to google docs the images
didn't get copied .Please look at the pdf please in order to see the little
bit of code.
_
--
You received this message because you are
Tkinter is used for creating applications. It has gridsystem though but
matplotlib should be a better choice.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 09:24 Arooshi Verma
wrote:
> Hi !
> I was going through various ways I can provide a GUI for the upcoming Bond
> Graph Tools project and came across Tkinter- (
>
Well if you see these algorithms are not for general purpose matrices but
for where high accuracy is required. I would rather say to use concepts of
group theory and representation theory (i do not have lot of knowledge
about this but 'm studying) which can reduce matrices to lower
dimensions.If
Hi,
I 'm a sophomore studying at Birla Institute of Science and
Technology, Pilani. I would like to implement the already introduced idea
of complex analysis which includes integration using Residue Theorem. The
solver would need the contour as an argument since I don't think there's a
method
ed/zli.pdf
and http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/viola/classes/gems-08/lectures/le21-23.pdf.
The ways suggested here can be used even when the dimensions of matrix are not
very large.
Can this be of any help?
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:48 PM Vishesh Mangla
wrote:
Well if you see these algorithms are not f
: Complex integration for GSoC '19
Start by taking up a smaller task among the ones you suggested and send a PR
for it. Since time is limited you would need to start writing your proposal now
and hopefully complete it by deadline.
On Sunday, March 17, 2019 at 11:39:17 AM UTC+5:30, Vishesh Mangla
019 at 11:39:17 AM UTC+5:30, Vishesh Mangla wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I 'm a sophomore studying at Birla Institute of Science and
>> Technology, Pilani. I would like to implement the already introduced idea
>> of complex analysis which includes integration using Residue
"Embedding Matrix Multiplication in a Group
Algebra " on page number 10 can be helpful.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:33 PM Shiksha Rawat wrote:
Can Jason Moore or Oscar suggest anything,please?
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:56 PM Vishesh Mangla
wrote:
Well, I can’t say much beca
.
>
> Benchmarking and profiling are very important if you are looking to
> improve performance. Also take a look at the benchmarking idea on the GSoC
> ideas page.
>
> Aaron Meurer
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:04 PM Vishesh Mangla
> wrote:
>
>> Give me 2 days s
Can you solve it manually?
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Stuart Reynolds
Sent: 08 March 2019 22:55
To: sympy
Subject: [sympy] Can sympy solve (1. - (x ** n)) ** (1/n) = y , and similar?
Dear Sympy users,
I'm new to sympy and interested in using it for function design.
I'm curious about
Well, representation theory is a part of mathematics which maps a matrix to a
small representation which is easily computable than those big matrix. This is
also related to block diagonalization. Otherwise Karatsuba fast multiplication
and strassen’s algo can be used for reducing complexity
Hello everyone,
My name is Vishesh Mangla, 2nd year student at Bits Pilani,Rajasthan,India
pursuing Msc.Chemistry + B Sc. Chemical Engineering (Duel Degree). I have
learned python from online sources and then I started solving problems on
Project Euler(Username : teutranian).I solved around 120
;
> If you have questions about it then probably best to ask on the issue.
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 22:31, Vishesh Mangla
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> > My name is Vishesh Mangla, 2nd year student at Bits
> Pilani,Rajasthan,India pursuing Msc.Chemistry + B Sc. Chem
Hey,I also love physics and math and would like to work on the changes which
you want to include.Can I get included in this?I ‘ve chemistry as my subject in
university but that too deals with a lot of physics Hermitian mostly but I know
lagrangian too.So please let me make it. If you remember
that you think can be improved. There's always something
> that can be improved so it's just a question of finding something that
> is worth doing and that you can do yourself.
>
> --
> Oscar
>
> On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 21:48, Vishesh Mangla
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey,
What do these builtins ought to be doing?
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Chris Smith
Sent: 09 May 2019 03:08
To: sympy
Subject: Re: [sympy] is compatibility builtins broken?
None of them work
>>> import sympy.core.compatibility.builtins as builtins
Traceback (most recent call last):
I 'm studying chemistry at Bits Pilani and I have studied Quantum Chemistry
previous year.I know about inf,finite,triangular potential Wells and
associated methods of solving differential equations.I have also studied
Hartree Fock analysis and related stuff I would also like to get included
if
Have you tried factor_list()?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
Why don’t you say it PyMath and let other thinks like scipy and numfocus also
use that?
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: David Bailey
Sent: 02 May 2019 14:43
To: sympy
Subject: [sympy] Re: SymPy - a suggestion
After more thought, I propose to call my software SymPyWorkbook because
Actually I feel that sympy ‘ s algos should be available for SciPy too cause I
require to solve a bunch of differential equations but I can’t use SciPy
goodies in sympy. Therefore I have to think and resort to other methods. I wish
both libraries could like use one another’s features and your
Sorry, if my tone was a little rough. I just wanted to suggest.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: David Bailey
Sent: 02 May 2019 19:15
To: sympy
Subject: [sympy] Re: SymPy - a suggestion
Vishesh,
I certainly don't want to obscure the sense that this is SimPy - after all,
many people here
Use slicing like q[:,0]
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: murat...@erzurum.edu.tr
Sent: 03 May 2019 13:20
To: sympy
Subject: [sympy] Creating a new matrix with removing columns in anoter
doesn'twork
Hello,
I am new to sympy and I want removed one column of a matrix and I want to
keep
What’s the problem that you are facing?
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: 'HARSHIT PATEL' via sympy
Sent: 29 August 2019 13:34
To: sympy
Subject: [sympy] Newcomer
Hi everyone,
My name is Harshit Patel and currently I am in my 4th year Btech at IIT
Hyderabad. I was an intern at Arista
Integration by parts definitely needs ML.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Aaron Meurer
Sent: 28 September 2019 00:18
To: sympy
Subject: [sympy] Symbolic integrator using a neural network
There's a review paper for ICLR 2020 on training a neural network to
do symbolic integration. They claim
I asked them for laplace transform to solve differential equations in my GSoC
proposal but I don’t think it’s required. I additionally said to include
residue theorem /Cauchy’s integral formula too.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: open jungle
Sent: 16 October 2019 03:31
To: sympy
Subject:
Hello,
I again propose to create a Jordan type integrator which I had proposed in
my last GSoC proposal last year. I actually want to create a complex number
module with other abilities of adding, subtraction etc. I 'm a sympy user
but want to get into development. So do tell if it's a good
to represent things coerced into a 2-tuple representation, than representing everything with a multiplication with imaginary unit?On Wednesday, December 18, 2019 at 5:56:59 PM UTC+9, Vishesh Mangla wrote:Hello,I again propose to create a Jordan type integrator which I had proposed in my last GSoC
Why don’t you use the chain rule (d f(x) / dx) * (dx/d(x+1)). For first order derivative you can use the reciprocal therefore dx/d(x+1) = 1/(d(x+1)/dx). Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: David BaileySent: 04 January 2020 16:36To: sympy@googlegroups.comSubject: Re: [sympy] Suggestion on
).diff(x+1)`` is better than ``(Derivative(f(x), x) * 1/Derivative(x+1, x)).doit()``. If we can do something explicitly, then it would be better to do it implicitly. 2020년 1월 5일 일요일 오전 12시 27분 17초 UTC+9, Vishesh Mangla 님의 말:Why don’t you use the chain rule (d f(x) / dx) * (dx/d(x+1)). For first order derivati
30 matches
Mail list logo
