On 11/08/14 17:14, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 11.08.14 15:57, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Fri, 08.08.14 17:00, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
According to Brent Baude bba...@redhat.com, who provided the
On Fri, 08.08.14 17:00, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
According to Brent Baude bba...@redhat.com, who provided the patch,
IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all.
What is support supposed to mean? Does that mean
On Mon, 11.08.14 15:57, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Fri, 08.08.14 17:00, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
According to Brent Baude bba...@redhat.com, who provided the patch,
IBM doesn't want to support the PPC
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 15:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 08.08.14 17:00, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
According to Brent Baude bba...@redhat.com, who provided the patch,
IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 17:40:40 +0200
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:00:11PM +0200, har...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
According to Brent Baude bba...@redhat.com, who provided the patch,
IBM doesn't want to support
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:00:11PM +0200, har...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
According to Brent Baude bba...@redhat.com, who provided the patch,
IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all.
They might now want to support it, but we might want
