2015-02-11 20:12 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering :
> So, I have discussed this with Kay, David, Daniel, and co. And we
> kinda came to the conclusion that we might as well just drop the
> configurability where runlevel3-5.target point to. If we drop that, we
Do you mean runlevel2-5, or is runlevel2 e
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:43:00PM +, lux-integ wrote:
> Greetings
>
> I have a recently minted x86 clfs multilib build )
> ( http://clfs.org/view/git/x86_64/ )
> I am using stuff out of git
> with modifications such as
> linux-3.18.5
> systemd-218
>
> It refuses to boot
> On startup i
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:46:37PM +0100, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 11.02.15 01:40, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> Yep. Makes sense.
> >>
> >> Here is a status on what I have done so far.
> >>
>
Greetings
I have a recently minted x86 clfs multilib build )
( http://clfs.org/view/git/x86_64/ )
I am using stuff out of git
with modifications such as
linux-3.18.5
systemd-218
It refuses to boot
On startup it reports
[OK] reached target network
[5.123288] systemd[1] reached target Networ
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 11.02.15 01:40, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Yep. Makes sense.
>>
>> Here is a status on what I have done so far.
>>
>> include-what-you-want does the following:
>> 1) sorts the includes
>> 2) adds missing
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-11 17:05 +0100]:
> Actually, the fact that the unit changes directly from "dead" to
> "mounted" is interesting. The unit does not go through "mounting",
> which means that it's not the unit that is invoking the /bin/mount
> command for this but something else.. Do you se
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 02:18:12PM +, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> CC'ing Peter Hutterer as "the xorg input guy" for his thoughts :)
>
> Lennart Poettering wrote on 11/02/15 11:46:
> > On Wed, 11.02.15 10:43, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've recently run into
On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 21:46 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 11.02.15 20:36, Keller, Jacob E (jacob.e.kel...@intel.com) wrote:
>
> > > > Yes. I believe that possibly the netlink messages are occurring too
> > > > early before networkd has started. Thus, when I restart the service
> > > >
On 30/01/15 08:30, Simon McVittie wrote:
So that the people who are happy with the complexities of the current
arrangement can remain happy, here is how I intend it to work:
* ./configure --disable-user-bus: you get a login-session-centric world
* ./configure --enable-user-bus: you get a user-se
On Fri, 06.02.15 20:28, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
> > Hum, we told at the sprint that we wanted to be that available for everyone,
> > and not having any conditions. Distros which still desires only the existing
> > behavior would not ship files in *-preset-transient
On Fri, 06.02.15 18:29, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Le 05/02/2015 17:11, Dimitri John Ledkov a écrit :
> >Some context for this patch.
>
> Hey Dimitri, thanks for working on that. I'm just giving a broader context
> for everyone who followed the past discussion we had in december/
On Wed, 11.02.15 20:36, Keller, Jacob E (jacob.e.kel...@intel.com) wrote:
> > > Yes. I believe that possibly the netlink messages are occurring too
> > > early before networkd has started. Thus, when I restart the service
> > > after startup it works fine.
> >
> > Well, the first thing after subs
On Thu, 05.02.15 16:11, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
>
> -static int get_config_path(UnitFileScope scope, bool runtime, const char
> *root_dir, char **ret) {
> +static int get_config_path(UnitFileScope scope, bool runtime, bool preset,
> const char *root_dir, char **
On Thu, 05.02.15 16:11, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
> Some context for this patch.
>
> I would like to support a new preset model, which has the following
> properties:
>
> - distribution shipped defaults are enabled
> - and are applied to each boot/upgrade
> - wi
On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 21:32 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 11.02.15 20:22, Keller, Jacob E (jacob.e.kel...@intel.com) wrote:
>
> > > > I actually see the same behavior now again, so the removal of
> > > > biosdevname does not solve this problem! :(
> > > >
> > > > Is there any more in
On Wed, 11.02.15 20:22, Keller, Jacob E (jacob.e.kel...@intel.com) wrote:
> > > I actually see the same behavior now again, so the removal of
> > > biosdevname does not solve this problem! :(
> > >
> > > Is there any more information I can provide?
> >
> > Hmm, it appears as if networkd complete
On Thu, 05.02.15 11:33, Chris Leech (cle...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lee Duncan and I were looking at a situation with iscsid where a
> systemctl stop command would sometimes print a job canceled message, and
> the service would be immediately restarted.
>
> The problem seems to be that the
On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 19:39 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 04.02.15 21:58, Keller, Jacob E (jacob.e.kel...@intel.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi again,
> >
> > On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 19:00 +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > I've recently been using systemd-networkd to great suc
On Wed, 11.02.15 21:00, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Lennart Poettering schrieb:
>
> > On Wed, 11.02.15 16:08, Vasiliy Tolstov (v.tols...@selfip.ru) wrote:
> >
> >> 2015-02-11 14:42 GMT+03:00 Tom Gundersen :
> >> > systemd-networkd-wait-online gained two new features in git (onlin
On Wed, 11.02.15 23:10, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> В Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:12:35 +0100
> Lennart Poettering пишет:
>
> > On Thu, 05.02.15 01:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > Just want to know why he didn't considered pushing this pat
Lennart Poettering schrieb:
> On Wed, 11.02.15 16:08, Vasiliy Tolstov (v.tols...@selfip.ru) wrote:
>
>> 2015-02-11 14:42 GMT+03:00 Tom Gundersen :
>> > systemd-networkd-wait-online gained two new features in git (online
>> > manpages are still lagging):
>> >
>> >--ignore=
>> >
On Thu, 05.02.15 19:20, Olivier Brunel (j...@jjacky.com) wrote:
> On 02/03/15 22:17, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Fri, 12.12.14 16:06, Olivier Brunel (j...@jjacky.com) wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for resurrecting this old thread this late. Is this still an
> > issue? Does this work on current git?
>
Lennart Poettering schrieb:
> On Wed, 11.02.15 20:05, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Lennart Poettering schrieb:
>>
>> > On Tue, 10.02.15 22:28, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> >
>> >> This is the plain Gentoo kernel 3.18.6 for desktop, nothing special
>> >> except
В Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:12:35 +0100
Lennart Poettering пишет:
> On Thu, 05.02.15 01:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> > > Just want to know why he didn't considered pushing this patch upstream.
> > > Apparently already two distros patch this downstream, so having a fix
On Thu, 05.02.15 10:08, John Lane (syst...@jelmail.com) wrote:
> On 02/02/15 20:54, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Sat, 31.01.15 11:21, John Lane (syst...@jelmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> Further to this, I tried manually creating a systemd-cryptsetup unit
> >> instead of putting an entry in /etc/cr
On Thu, 05.02.15 15:11, Angelos Ching (angelosch...@clustertech.com) wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm not exactly sure if I'm asking the right question in the right place,
> please let me know if this is not the right place for this question.
>
> I'm setting up SR-IOV for my Intel I350 igb on CentOS 6.
On Thu, 05.02.15 00:50, Mikhail Morfikov (mmorfi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > That indicates that the systemd or apache inside the container do not
> > correctly make use of the the socket passed into them. You need to
> > make sure that inside the container you have pretty much the same
> > .socket u
On Sun, 08.02.15 20:29, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
> Otherwise systemd-reboot.service will remove the parameter that was set
> before. This was broken in commit "b986229efe2cc96157aa14c37bab7843311bbef1
> systemctl: bugfix for systemctl reboot command with argument"
> ---
>
On Mon, 09.02.15 22:46, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> B is started because C is started so it is not relevant.
>
> C is started probably due to logic "if A and C are running and you
> restart A you should also restart C". I am not convinced it is the
> right thing to do TBH, but
On Wed, 11.02.15 20:05, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Lennart Poettering schrieb:
>
> > On Tue, 10.02.15 22:28, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> This is the plain Gentoo kernel 3.18.6 for desktop, nothing special
> >> except BFQ patches (applied by the Gentoo kerne
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:12:35PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 05.02.15 01:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> > > Just want to know why he didn't considered pushing this patch upstream.
> > > Apparently already two distros patch this downstream, so having
Nice, everything works flawlessly with current git now. Good job!
2015-02-10 10:34 GMT+01:00 Daniel Buch :
> Hi,
>
> This is just a heads up.
>
> Avahi-daemon doesn't work on my system with kdbus and bus-proxyd. I
> appended a log. I hope this helps. Otherwise every thing works quite well
> for m
On Thu, 05.02.15 01:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> > Just want to know why he didn't considered pushing this patch upstream.
> > Apparently already two distros patch this downstream, so having a fix
> > upstream would imho make sense.
>
> Because it was just a hack :)
Lennart Poettering schrieb:
> On Tue, 10.02.15 22:28, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> This is the plain Gentoo kernel 3.18.6 for desktop, nothing special
>> except BFQ patches (applied by the Gentoo kernel package itself, not
>> manually patched). I'm pretty sure Gentoo does not ap
Andrei Borzenkov schrieb:
> В Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:28:23 +0100
> Kai Krakow пишет:
>
>> Lennart Poettering schrieb:
>>
>> > On Tue, 10.02.15 20:16, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> >
>> >> Then the question is: Why or what does try to start a user session in
>> >> the first place?
On Sun, 08.02.15 09:21, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> В Wed, 4 Feb 2015 14:34:01 +0100
> Lennart Poettering пишет:
>
> > On Wed, 04.02.15 11:13, Peter Valdemar Mørch (pe...@morch.com) wrote:
> >
> > > First: Please let me know if this is an inappropriate place to ask this
> >
El 11/02/15 a las 14:26, Lennart Poettering escribió:
On Wed, 11.02.15 18:21, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
So, hmm, so if I got this right:
a) The good basame() is in strings.h
b) The bad basename() is in libgen.h
c) The only other call in libgen.h is dirname()
The
On Wed, 04.02.15 21:58, Keller, Jacob E (jacob.e.kel...@intel.com) wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 19:00 +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I've recently been using systemd-networkd to great success on a few of
> > my machines here. However I ran into an interesting prob
On Wed, 11.02.15 17:48, Peter Lemenkov (lemen...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello All!
> I see that promiscous mode was discussed a few times before but I'm
> not sure if I found something new or not.
>
> I've got the following setup - a physical interface (enp1s0f0), which
> I wanted to add to the brid
On Fri, 06.02.15 14:11, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Simon McVittie <
> simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > On 06/02/15 03:32, 张洋 wrote:
> >
> >> dbus-daemon --session --print-address --fork > /tmp/session_amgr
> >>
> >
> > This is a secur
On Wed, 11.02.15 17:44, Rauta, Alin (alin.ra...@intel.com) wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> > +_public_ int sd_network_link_get_carriers(int ifindex, char ***ret) {
> > +return network_get_link_strv("CARRIERS", ifindex, ret); }
> > +
>
> > I think it would be better to have two calls here:
> >
On Wed, 11.02.15 18:52, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> On Wed, 11.02.15 18:27, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> > > > extern char *__xpg_basename (char *__path) __THROW;
> > > > #define basename__xpg_basename
> > > >
> > > > And __xpg_b
On Wed, 11.02.15 18:27, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> > > extern char *__xpg_basename (char *__path) __THROW;
> > > #define basename __xpg_basename
> > >
> > > And __xpg_basename is the borked implementation. #undef basename means
> > > that
> > > we use the GNU v
Hi Lennart,
> +_public_ int sd_network_link_get_carriers(int ifindex, char ***ret) {
> +return network_get_link_strv("CARRIERS", ifindex, ret); }
> +
> I think it would be better to have two calls here:
>
> int sd_network_link_get_carrier_bound_to(int ifindex, int **others);
> int sd
On Wed, 11.02.15 17:26, Topi Miettinen (toiwo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 02/11/15 16:33, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 11.02.15 18:32, Topi Miettinen (toiwo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> No setuid programs are expected to be executed, so add
> >> SecureBits=noroot noroot-locked
> >> to uni
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 06:26:41PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 11.02.15 18:21, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 06:18:54PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Wed, 11.02.15 18:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.p
On Wed, 11.02.15 18:21, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 06:18:54PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 11.02.15 18:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 06:05:13PM +0100, Lennart
On 02/11/15 16:33, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 11.02.15 18:32, Topi Miettinen (toiwo...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> No setuid programs are expected to be executed, so add
>> SecureBits=noroot noroot-locked
>> to unit files.
>
> Applied! Thanks!
>
> (I hope this is well tested!)
I think I sh
On Wed, 11.02.15 17:07, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> Lennart Poettering wrote on 11/02/15 16:36:
> > On Wed, 11.02.15 14:18, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> >
> Also, anything plugged in to Xorg after running localectl (thus updating
> 00-keyboard.conf) wi
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 06:18:54PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 11.02.15 18:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 06:05:13PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Mon, 09.02.15 21:41, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org)
On Wed, 11.02.15 18:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 06:05:13PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 09.02.15 21:41, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote:
> >
> > > execute.c only uses basename (the GNU version in )
> >
>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 06:05:13PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 09.02.15 21:41, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote:
>
> > execute.c only uses basename (the GNU version in )
>
> Is this right even?
>
> This was added by Zbigniew in 2b6bf07dd23bb467099d213c97b3875c5e
Lennart Poettering wrote on 11/02/15 16:36:
> On Wed, 11.02.15 14:18, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
>
Also, anything plugged in to Xorg after running localectl (thus updating
00-keyboard.conf) will also get the "us" keymap (as that was what was in
place at Xorg init ti
On Mon, 09.02.15 21:41, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote:
> execute.c only uses basename (the GNU version in )
Is this right even?
This was added by Zbigniew in 2b6bf07dd23bb467099d213c97b3875c5e453491:
"Get rid of our reimplementation of basename
The only proble
On Mon, 09.02.15 11:35, Robert Milasan (rmila...@suse.com) wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:19:35 +0100
> "Robert Milasan" wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Milasan
> > ---
> > src/udev/ata_id/ata_id.c | 4
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/udev/ata_id/ata_id.c b
On Wed, 11.02.15 17:53, Djalal Harouni (tix...@opendz.org) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:06:56PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 11.02.15 13:53, Djalal Harouni (tix...@opendz.org) wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:52:34PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > > On Th
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:06:56PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 11.02.15 13:53, Djalal Harouni (tix...@opendz.org) wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:52:34PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Thu, 05.02.15 02:03, Vasiliy Tolstov (v.tols...@selfip.ru) wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Tue, 10.02.15 03:30, Alin Rauta (alin.ra...@intel.com) wrote:
> ---
> man/systemd.network.xml | 11 ++
> src/libsystemd/sd-network/sd-network.c | 4 +
> src/network/networkctl.c | 211
> ---
> src/network/networkd-link.c
On Wed, 11.02.15 14:18, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> >> Also, anything plugged in to Xorg after running localectl (thus updating
> >> 00-keyboard.conf) will also get the "us" keymap (as that was what was in
> >> place at Xorg init time).
> >>
> >> Wouldn't it be better to do the f
On Wed, 11.02.15 18:32, Topi Miettinen (toiwo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> No setuid programs are expected to be executed, so add
> SecureBits=noroot noroot-locked
> to unit files.
Applied! Thanks!
(I hope this is well tested!)
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
On Wed, 11.02.15 16:24, Topi Miettinen (toiwo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 02/10/15 21:00, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Sat, 07.02.15 10:40, Topi Miettinen (toiwo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> No setuid programs are expected to be executed, so add
> >> SecureBits=no-setuid-fixup no-setuid-fixup-
No setuid programs are expected to be executed, so add
SecureBits=noroot noroot-locked
to unit files.
---
units/systemd-hostnamed.service.in| 1 +
units/systemd-importd.service.in | 1 +
units/systemd-journal-gatewayd.service.in | 1 +
units/systemd-journal-remote.service.in | 1
On Wed, 11.02.15 17:22, Torstein Husebø (torst...@huseboe.net) wrote:
Thanks! APplied!
> ---
> man/systemd.generator.xml | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/man/systemd.generator.xml b/man/systemd.generator.xml
> index 519da15910..ccb698752a 100644
> --- a/m
On 02/10/15 21:00, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sat, 07.02.15 10:40, Topi Miettinen (toiwo...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> No setuid programs are expected to be executed, so add
>> SecureBits=no-setuid-fixup no-setuid-fixup-locked
>> to unit files.
>
> So, hmm, after reading the man page again: what'
---
man/systemd.generator.xml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/man/systemd.generator.xml b/man/systemd.generator.xml
index 519da15910..ccb698752a 100644
--- a/man/systemd.generator.xml
+++ b/man/systemd.generator.xml
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
/etc.
After in
On Wed, 11.02.15 13:53, Djalal Harouni (tix...@opendz.org) wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:52:34PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Thu, 05.02.15 02:03, Vasiliy Tolstov (v.tols...@selfip.ru) wrote:
> >
> > > Hello!
> > > Does it possible to create container as regular user? Oh what cap
On Wed, 11.02.15 13:45, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Lennart Poettering [2015-02-11 13:29 +0100]:
> > On Wed, 11.02.15 13:20, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > for a few weeks now (roughly since upgrading to 218) I often end up
> > > wi
Hi
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Lukasz Skalski wrote:
> diff --git a/test/test-free.c b/test/test-free.c
> index 01dca80..f666da3 100644
> --- a/test/test-free.c
> +++ b/test/test-free.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,22 @@
> #include "kdbus-enum.h"
> #include "kdbus-test.h"
>
> +static int sample_ioctl_ca
CC'ing Peter Hutterer as "the xorg input guy" for his thoughts :)
Lennart Poettering wrote on 11/02/15 11:46:
> On Wed, 11.02.15 10:43, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've recently run into an annoying problem with the localed xorg.conf
>> snippet.
>>
>> As it writes a
Przemyslaw Rudy [2015-02-11 14:14 +0100]:
> Curious - by any chance do you mount these also at initramfs level?
No, we don't, only the root partition (readonly); I should have
mentioned that indeed.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu
Hello All!
I see that promiscous mode was discussed a few times before but I'm
not sure if I found something new or not.
I've got the following setup - a physical interface (enp1s0f0), which
I wanted to add to the bridge (br0).
My setup consists of the following files
* br0.netdev:
[NetDev]
Nam
On 02/11/2015 01:45 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Lennart Poettering [2015-02-11 13:29 +0100]:
>> On Wed, 11.02.15 13:20, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> for a few weeks now (roughly since upgrading to 218) I often end up
>>> with my /home and /srv (from fstab) not
diff --git a/test/test-free.c b/test/test-free.c
index 01dca80..f666da3 100644
--- a/test/test-free.c
+++ b/test/test-free.c
@@ -14,6 +14,22 @@
#include "kdbus-enum.h"
#include "kdbus-test.h"
+static int sample_ioctl_call(struct kdbus_test_env *env)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct kdbus_cmd_
Since i couldn't find any info on the python's systemd-dbus api to get
the status of the services that i wanted i looked into python-systemd
and made a class (which is far from being ideal i must admit as i am a
python newbie) that monitors the journal for failed services. Class is
based upon info
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:52:34PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 05.02.15 02:03, Vasiliy Tolstov (v.tols...@selfip.ru) wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> > Does it possible to create container as regular user? Oh what capabilities
> > i need to add to create container not using root?
>
> Invoking
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-11 13:29 +0100]:
> On Wed, 11.02.15 13:20, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > for a few weeks now (roughly since upgrading to 218) I often end up
> > with my /home and /srv (from fstab) not mounted after booting, and I
> > have to run
On Tue, 10.02.15 03:09, Mikhail Morfikov (mmorfi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I'm playing with the journal to see what useful things it can do, and I
> have two questions:
>
> 1. Rsyslog has the ability of filtering logs, for instance:
>
> if $syslogtag contains "something" and ($msg contains "somethi
On Wed, 11.02.15 13:20, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> for a few weeks now (roughly since upgrading to 218) I often end up
> with my /home and /srv (from fstab) not mounted after booting, and I
> have to run "mount -a" manually. Initially I attributed this to my
> h
Hello all,
for a few weeks now (roughly since upgrading to 218) I often end up
with my /home and /srv (from fstab) not mounted after booting, and I
have to run "mount -a" manually. Initially I attributed this to my
hacked-up laptop, but now I got a report from another user about that
too (https:/
On Wed, 11.02.15 16:08, Vasiliy Tolstov (v.tols...@selfip.ru) wrote:
> 2015-02-11 14:42 GMT+03:00 Tom Gundersen :
> > systemd-networkd-wait-online gained two new features in git (online
> > manpages are still lagging):
> >
> >--ignore=
> >Network interfaces to be ignored when d
2015-02-11 14:42 GMT+03:00 Tom Gundersen :
> systemd-networkd-wait-online gained two new features in git (online
> manpages are still lagging):
>
>--ignore=
>Network interfaces to be ignored when deciding if the
> system is online. By default only the loopback interface is ignor
On Fri, 06.02.15 16:46, Maciej Wereski (m.were...@partner.samsung.com) wrote:
> ---
> src/core/load-fragment.c | 14 --
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/core/load-fragment.c b/src/core/load-fragment.c
> index 90bf563..6108d12 100644
> --- a/src/
On Fri, 06.02.15 09:55, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> this update now uses the logic from src/shared/install.h, and also
> documents the rationale better: The primary reason is to actually
> respect a disabled native unit instead of re-enabling it "through the
> bac
On Wed, 11.02.15 11:50, Paul Martin (paul.mar...@codethink.co.uk) wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:10:43PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > Hmm, I think it would be nicer to use be32toh() here instead, since it
> > ensures the macro is (to a limited degree) typesafe.
> >
> > Any chance
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 06.02.15 17:12, John Lane (syst...@jelmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Good afternoon. I have some errors in the boot sequence of a newly built
>> system:
>>
>> I see:
>>
>> systemd[1]: Unit type .busname is not supported on this system
On Fri, 06.02.15 10:26, John Lane (syst...@jelmail.com) wrote:
>
> Two years ago I raised a query about bind mounting a subdirectory on top
> of its parent mount point. I supplied a patch to allow this; it was
> discussed but wasn't accepted.
>
> At that time, there was talk about implementing a
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:10:43PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Hmm, I think it would be nicer to use be32toh() here instead, since it
> ensures the macro is (to a limited degree) typesafe.
>
> Any chance you could rework that?
From: Paul Martin
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:47:16 +
Subje
On Wed, 11.02.15 10:43, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently run into an annoying problem with the localed xorg.conf
> snippet.
>
> As it writes an xorg.conf.d snippet, this seems ot take priority over
> udev properties (xkblayout) etc. which Xorg has supported for
On Tue, 10.02.15 22:28, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
> This is the plain Gentoo kernel 3.18.6 for desktop, nothing special except
> BFQ patches (applied by the Gentoo kernel package itself, not manually
> patched). I'm pretty sure Gentoo does not apply any special extra patches.
> A
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> Nice, can you say how to reduce timeout manually to 30s? Where I need to
> change value?
systemd-networkd-wait-online gained two new features in git (online
manpages are still lagging):
--ignore=
Network interfaces to b
Unless I have overooked something, there seems to be no way to tell dhcp
client to fail and leave card unset after some timeout.
We had popwer interruption, which left dhcp server unconcious and after
rebooting my workstation I couldn't get it up, since it was waiting for
dhcp client to get it
On Wed, 11.02.15 01:40, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Yep. Makes sense.
>
> Here is a status on what I have done so far.
>
> include-what-you-want does the following:
> 1) sorts the includes
> 2) adds missing headers for any symbols used
> 3) adds forward declarations
> 4) rem
Nice, can you say how to reduce timeout manually to 30s? Where I need to
change value?
11 февр. 2015 г. 13:54 пользователь "Tom Gundersen" написал:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Branko wrote:
> > Unless I have overlooked something, there seems to be no way to tell dhcp
> > client to fail a
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Colin Guthrie
wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it be better to do the following:
>
> 1. deprecate the 00-keyboard.conf xorg.conf.d file
> 2. Instead apply the locale settings in udev via "xkb*" properties
>
> This then allows the properties to change during runtime and the key
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Branko wrote:
> Unless I have overlooked something, there seems to be no way to tell dhcp
> client to fail and leave card unset after some timeout.
>
> We had power interruption, which left dhcp server unconcious and after
> rebooting my workstation I couldn't get
Unless I have overlooked something, there seems to be no way to tell
dhcp client to fail and leave card unset after some timeout.
We had power interruption, which left dhcp server unconcious and after
rebooting my workstation I couldn't get it up, since it was waiting for
dhcp client to get it
Hi,
I've recently run into an annoying problem with the localed xorg.conf
snippet.
As it writes an xorg.conf.d snippet, this seems ot take priority over
udev properties (xkblayout) etc. which Xorg has supported for some time.
If x starts with this snippet in place and it has a layout of e.g "us"
97 matches
Mail list logo
