Hi
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 02:07:27PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> I don't think we should return when we see INPUT_PROP_ACCEL. If a
>> >> keyboard embeds an ac
Hi
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> No point parsing the properties if we can't get the devnode to apply them
> later. Plus, this makes future additions easier to slot in.
> ---
> src/udev/udev-builtin-keyboard.c | 17 +
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+),
Hi,
On 07-04-15 07:07, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 04:11:59PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Lenovo has changed the sensitity of the trackpoint on the x240 / T440s / T540
s/sensitity/sensitivity/
generation of Thinkpads, making them somewhat unsensitive by default, add a
I
Hi
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> Rather than building a map and looping through the map, immediately call the
> ioctl when we have a successfully parsed property.
>
> This has a side-effect: before the maximum number of ioctls was limited to the
> size of the map (1024)
Hi
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> No changes in the mapping, but previously we opened the device only on
> successful parsing. Now we open the mapping as soon as we have a value that
> looks interesting. Since errors are supposed to be the exception, not the
> rule, this
Hi
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:54:50PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> Hey Peter,
>>
>> thanks for these! Patches 1 to 4 look good to me, but I have some
>> questions/comments on this one.
>>
>> Peter Hutterer [2015-03-23 11:30 +1000]:
>> > ---
Hi,
Thanks for the review, v3 with all the commit message corrections
taken care of coming up.
On 07-04-15 07:06, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 04:11:58PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
diff --git a/hwdb/70-pointingstick.hwdb b/hwdb/70-pointingstick.hwdb
index a893da6..d92434e
Hi
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> Verified for the 5,1 Macbook, the others are guesses based on the list of
> supported devices of the moshi trackpad protector.
> http://www.moshi.com/trackpad-protector-trackguard-macbook-pro#silver
>
> Resolution calculated based on the
Hi
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> Also referred to as trackpoint, trackstick. These are marked by recent kernels
> through an input prop. Forward that prop as udev property so userspace can
> easily determine whether there is a pointing stick present.
>
> These devices w
IBM / Lenovo trackpoints allow specifying a sensitivity setting through a
ps/2 command, which changes the range of the deltas sent when using the
trackpoint. On some models with normal usage only deltas of 1 or 2 are send,
resulting in there only being 2 mouse cursor movement speeds, rather than
th
Lenovo has changed the sensitivity of the trackpoint on the x240 / T440s / T540
generation of Thinkpads, making them somewhat insensitive by default, add a
hwdb entry to tweak the sensitivity setting.
The ThinkPad X200s is way way too slow by default and unless you push the
trackpoint quite hard o
The pointingstick of the Dell Latitude E6400 is somewhat slow by default,
whereas the pointingstick of the Dell Latitude D620 is much too fast by
default, set POINTINGSTICK_CONST_ACCEL for both of them to adjust for this.
---
hwdb/70-pointingstick.hwdb | 12
1 file changed, 12 inserti
There is quite a wide spread in the delta events generated by pointingsticks,
some generate deltas of 1-2 under normal use, while others generate deltas
from 1-20.
This commit adds a set of rules + a hwdb file which allows specifying a
per model POINTINGSTICK_CONST_ACCEL value which can be used by
Hi All,
Here is v3 of my pointingstick set.
Changes since v2:
-Fix numerous spelling / gramatical errors in commit messages
-Add a reference to the kernel sources for the ibm trackpoint sensitivity
setting
Changes since v1:
-Drop the patch to set ID_INPUT_TRACKPOINT, Peter already send almost t
Hi
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> IBM / Lenovo trackpoints allow specifying a sensitivity setting through a
> ps/2 command, which changes the range of the deltas sent when using the
> trackpoint. On some models with normal usage only deltas of 1 or 2 are send,
> resulting
From: Gavin Li
This adds support for the keyboard illumination keys and fixes
Fn+F1.
---
hwdb/60-keyboard.hwdb | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hwdb/60-keyboard.hwdb b/hwdb/60-keyboard.hwdb
index 8f0565d..84356cb 100644
--- a/hwdb/60-keyboard.hwdb
+++ b/hwdb/60-keyboard.
Hi
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Mikhail Morfikov wrote:
> In the systemd-resolved manual we can read something like this:
>
> The DNS servers contacted are determined from the global settings in
> resolved.conf(5), the per-link static settings in .network files, and
> the per-link dynam
Hi,
On 07-04-15 12:23, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
IBM / Lenovo trackpoints allow specifying a sensitivity setting through a
ps/2 command, which changes the range of the deltas sent when using the
trackpoint. On some models with normal usage
Hi
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> The series looks reasonable, but I wonder why we cannot merge it into
>> 60-keyboard.rule (60-evdev.rule now) like Peter's series does? In that
>> case, please make this a builtin of input_id which uses
>> udev_device_get_parent_subsystem
Hi,
On 07-04-15 13:46, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
The series looks reasonable, but I wonder why we cannot merge it into
60-keyboard.rule (60-evdev.rule now) like Peter's series does? In that
case, please make this a builtin of input_id which
Hi
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 07-04-15 13:46, David Herrmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
The series looks reasonable, but I wonder why we cannot merge it into
60-keyboard.rule (60-evdev.rule no
Hi there!
Some time ago I've read in David Herrmann's blog about DRM/KMS device node
splitting project, and now I realised that render node splitting is already
merged into kernel and enabled by default since release 3.17, which is
going to be included in major distros' next releases.
I suppose i
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 06:46 +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 25/03/15 14:36, Patrik Flykt wrote:
> > IFA_FLAGS is a discrete value and has no preprocessor #define defined for
> > it. Fix this by always using the value.
>
> Seems that fix was not a real fix:
>
> CC src/libsys
On Mon, 06.04.15 15:12, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Hello Lennart, all,
>
> Lennart Poettering [2015-04-03 14:58 +0200]:
> > To start with, the code is really wrong, it should never have been
> > merged in its current state, the read/write logic for the sockets is
> > completely
On Mon, 06.04.15 15:21, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Hello all,
Heya,
> Lennart Poettering [2015-04-03 16:34 +0200]:
> > Well, I had a brief look at this patch, but it still doesn't get the
> > socket IO stuff right. It uses synchronous fgets() to read things of
> > the sockets,
Hello,
We started work on a tool dedicated to check systemd unit files.
Its main purpose will be to parse all or a subset of them, look for
common errors, suboptimal designs.
It will also check single unit file separately or sets of them
referencing one another (for example cycles).
We need some
On Sun, 05.04.15 13:25, Jakub Klinkovský (j@gmx.com) wrote:
> As per systemd 216 NEWS [1], alternative NTP implementations should add
> Conflicts=systemd-timesyncd.service to be recognized by systemd, which
> ntpd.service on Arch Linux does. But still, active ntpd.service does not seem
> to be
On Tue, 07.04.15 16:35, Przemyslaw Kedzierski (p.kedzier...@samsung.com) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We started work on a tool dedicated to check systemd unit files.
> Its main purpose will be to parse all or a subset of them, look for
> common errors, suboptimal designs.
> It will also check single unit
I spotted these while looking something up on freedesktop.org.
Richard Maw (2):
man: Resolve how to refer to derived names for machinectl containers
man: fix typos in machinectl
man/machinectl.xml | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
The s/now/not/ unfortunately inverted the meaning.
---
man/machinectl.xml | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/machinectl.xml b/man/machinectl.xml
index eee7d0d..59a6e14 100644
--- a/man/machinectl.xml
+++ b/man/machinectl.xml
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@
On Sun, 05.04.15 09:56, sdrb (s...@onet.eu) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got a few very basic questions regarding configuration of systemd.
>
> I'm trying to setup some minimal configuration for qemu running linux.
>
> The qemu runs linux kernel which mounts nfs-root as root directory.
> I've made
"the name it is" is clumsy english, and since the most recently referred
to thing was a name anyway we can just leave the "it is".
This matches later uses in the same document.
---
man/machinectl.xml | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/machinectl.xml b/man/
On Tue, 07.04.15 15:53, Richard Maw (richard@codethink.co.uk) wrote:
> I spotted these while looking something up on freedesktop.org.
Applied both! Thanks!
>
> Richard Maw (2):
> man: Resolve how to refer to derived names for machinectl containers
> man: fix typos in machinectl
>
> ma
On Sat, 04.04.15 09:14, Cecil Westerhof (cldwester...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I have the following fetchMail.service file:
> [Unit]
> Description=Fetch email for the IMAPS server
> After=network.target
>
> [Service]
> Type=simple
> ExecStart=/home/imaps/bin/fetchMail.sh
>
On Sat, 04.04.15 15:33, Kai Hendry (hen...@webconverger.com) wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Lennart! I'm sorry I couldn't attend your FOSSASIA
> talk in Singapore. I was on holiday.
>
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2015, at 12:16 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > something else that runs before it is hanging hen
On Fri, 03.04.15 14:14, Alison Chaiken (ali...@she-devel.com) wrote:
> I've been using Qemu to cross-compile packages and root filesystems
> for a while and thought I'd try nspawn instead.While I sometimes
> want a full GUI desktop in the walled-off environment, mostly console
> is enough, and
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 12:08:04PM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed that networkd occasionally fails to bring up one of two
> network interfaces on boot (this happens about once every 70 or so
> boots). The machine in question is a VMware ESXi 5.5 guest with two
> VMXNET3 netwo
On Fri, 03.04.15 21:19, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Previously udev used to undo mounts when a device *disappeared;*
> when
Note really. udev didn't have this functionality at the time I added
this to systemd.
> ~ Ah, yeah, and if dbus isn't running, systemctl spews out this:
>
On Sun, 05.04.15 08:38, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> When mount unit is not in cache, systemd creates *new* definition and
> sets BindsTo current device where filesystem is currently mounted.
>
> If mount unit is present in cache, it already has some BindsTo. When
> systemd pro
On Tue, 07.04.15 16:55, Patrik Flykt (patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 06:46 +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 25/03/15 14:36, Patrik Flykt wrote:
> > > IFA_FLAGS is a discrete value and has no preprocessor #define defined for
> > > it. Fix this by al
Hi
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> We probably should add chekcs for these to "systemd-analyze verify"
> even...
Perhaps packaging guidelines should recommend running this command or it
should be part of the macro that packages include that logs warnings when
uni
On Mon, 06.04.15 22:16, Paul Menzel (paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 03.04.2015, 16:47 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > On Thu, 02.04.15 13:11, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> > > some network cards with certain cables and devices take up to five
> > > seconds so that the
On Fri, 03.04.15 19:37, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> В Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:04:10 +0200
> Lennart Poettering пишет:
>
> > On Thu, 02.04.15 16:28, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Lennart Poettering [2015-04-02 13:03 +0200]:
> > > > Yeah, and rightfully so.
On Fri, 03.04.15 18:03, Jan Janssen (medhe...@web.de) wrote:
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - better logind API naming
> - don't write to efi vars if they don't change
Thanks, applied!
systemctl's new switch goes directly to the EFI system though,
currently, and even if we connect to a remote system
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 12:36:31PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> >
> > We probably should add chekcs for these to "systemd-analyze verify"
> > even...
>
>
> Perhaps packaging guidelines should recommend running this command
Hi!
On 07/04/15 15:55, Patrik Flykt wrote:
> IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
> from README state 3.8/3.7 at the moment.
>
> One could let the sd_rtnl_message_append_u32 for IFA_FLAGS fail in patch
> 2/3, but then user space has to play tricks with IPv6 DHCPv6
On Sun, 22.03.15 23:15, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 19.03.15 19:27, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> >
> >> Short version:
> >> --
> >> Instead of machinectl clone using
Hi!
On 07/04/15 19:06, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> On 07/04/15 15:55, Patrik Flykt wrote:
>> > IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
>> > from README state 3.8/3.7 at the moment.
>> >
>> > One could let the sd_rtnl_message_append_u32 for IFA_FLAGS fail in patch
>>
Hi!
On 07/04/15 19:09, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
>> > from README state 3.8/3.7 at the moment.
>> >
>> > One could let the sd_rtnl_message_append_u32 for IFA_FLAGS fail in
>> > patch
>> > 2/3, but
On 07.04.15 at 16:40, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sun, 05.04.15 13:25, Jakub Klinkovský (j@gmx.com) wrote:
>
> > As per systemd 216 NEWS [1], alternative NTP implementations should add
> > Conflicts=systemd-timesyncd.service to be recognized by systemd, which
> > ntpd.service on Arch Linux
Lennart Poettering [2015-04-03 14:38 +0200]:
> I habe now made the suggested change, simpl because it allows greater
> parallelization and should be without risk.
Cheers!
> However, this is not going to solve your problem, and quite frankly I
> don't think this is the way to fix your problem at a
Hi!
On 07/04/15 19:24, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
[...]
>> > Oh, sorry, the headers are from 3.12, but that's still newer than 3.8 in
>> > the doc...
>> >
>> > actually wrong, but your patch actually brakes compila
Add strings introduced by 5bdf22430e367799dfa66c724144b624c5479518
---
po/fr.po | 18 +++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/fr.po b/po/fr.po
index f26451f..3111c49 100644
--- a/po/fr.po
+++ b/po/fr.po
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-V
On Tue, 07.04.15 19:24, Alexander Sverdlin (alexander.sverd...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 07/04/15 19:09, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
> >> > from README state 3.8/3.7 at the moment.
> >> >
> >> > One co
---
Makefile.am | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index a575af6..9fa4223 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -109,8 +109,8 @@ udevrulesdir=$(udevlibexecdir)/rules.d
udevhwdbdir=$(udevlibexecdir)/hwdb.d
catalogdir=$(prefix)
and only fallback to gcc
---
configure.ac | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 1608c83..56340a2 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@ fi
AM_CONDITIONAL(ENABLE_EFI, [test "x$have_efi" = "xyes"])
#
---
---
Makefile.am | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 9fa4223..9b769ee 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -3725,8 +3725,7 @@ udevconfdir = $(sysconfdir)/udev
dist_udevconf_DATA = \
src/udev/udev.conf
-sharepkgcon
---
configure.ac | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 29111f5..1608c83 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ AS_IF([test "x$enable_gnuefi" != "xno"], [
[AC_MSG_ERROR([*** gnuefi su
---
Makefile.am | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 9b769ee..397a71c 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -2596,7 +2596,7 @@ $(systemd_boot_solib): $(systemd_boot_objects)
nm -D -u $@ | grep ' U ' && exit 1 || :
Hi,
These are just a few trivial patches fixing cross-compilation build and
installation.
1/5 follows what is done everywhere else in the Makefile
2/5 installs arch-specifc pkg-config file to the correct location
3/5 makes use of EFI_CC in the efi part of the configure too
4/5 actually allows to
Hi Sylvain,
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Sylvain Plantefève
wrote:
> Add strings introduced by 5bdf22430e367799dfa66c724144b624c5479518
> ---
> po/fr.po | 18 +++---
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/po/fr.po b/po/fr.po
> index f26451f..3111c49 10
On Tue, 07.04.15 20:01, Alexander Sverdlin (alexander.sverd...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 07/04/15 19:24, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> > IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
>
> [...]
>
> >> > Oh, sorry, the headers are from 3.12, but that's still newer t
Hi!
On 07/04/15 20:49, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
> > >> > from README state 3.8/3.7 at the moment.
> > >> >
> > >> > One could let the sd_rtnl_message_append_u32 for
> > >>
Hi Lennart,
On 07/04/15 21:09, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
> > >> > Oh, sorry, the headers are from 3.12, but that's still newer than
> > >> > 3.8 in the doc...
> > >> >
> > >>>
Fixes the following compilation problem:
src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-types.c:361:9: error: array index in initializer
exceeds array bounds
[IFA_FLAGS] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
^
src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-types.c:361:9: error: (near initialization for
'rtnl_address_ty
IFA_F_NOPREFIXROUTE is a usual #define appeared in Linux 3.14, so AC_CHECK_DECLS
is not necessary
---
Fixes second systemd compilation problem against Linux 3.12 uapi headers.
src/shared/missing.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/shared/missing.h b/src/shared/missing.h
2015-04-07 20:57 GMT+02:00 Ronny Chevalier :
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> Hi Ronny,
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Sylvain Plantefève
> wrote:
> > Add strings introduced by 5bdf22430e367799dfa66c724144b624c5479518
> > ---
> > po/fr.po | 18 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 de
Add strings introduced by 5bdf22430e367799dfa66c724144b624c5479518
---
po/fr.po | 20 +---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/fr.po b/po/fr.po
index f26451f..69862fb 100644
--- a/po/fr.po
+++ b/po/fr.po
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id
On 04/06/2015 02:13 PM, Paul Menzel via Syslinux wrote:
>>
>> The kernel boot protocol should probably be extended to accept a block
>> of values to be passed from the loader to the OS, and be exported
>> somewhere by the kernel itself to userspace.
>>
We have that, it is called initramfs. It con
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:37:09AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07-04-15 07:07, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 04:11:59PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>Lenovo has changed the sensitity of the trackpoint on the x240 / T440s /
> >>T540
> >
> >s/sensitity/sensitivity/
On 6 April 2015 at 01:12, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 06.04.15 06:17, 임창근 (ck21...@samsung.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello EveryOne.
>>
>> I wonder that If I use kernel v3.4 with systemd v219, systemd-run function
>> is work or not.
>> Because My target have kernel v3.4 and systemd v216.
>
> Pleas
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Sylvain Plantefève
wrote:
> Add strings introduced by 5bdf22430e367799dfa66c724144b624c5479518
> ---
> po/fr.po | 20 +---
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/po/fr.po b/po/fr.po
> index f26451f..69862fb 100644
> ---
On 3 April 2015 at 05:58, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya,
>
> so we discussed the whole fsckd situation a bit more here in Berlin,
> and we came to the conclusion that fsckd really should not exist the
> way it does in systemd.
>
> To start with, the code is really wrong, it should never have be
Commit 9ea28c55a2 (udev: remove seqnum API and all assumptions about
seqnums) introduced a regresion, ignoring the timeout option when
waiting until the event queue is empty.
Previously, if the udev event queue was not empty when the timeout was
expired, udevadm settle was returning with exit code
On 2 April 2015 at 00:39, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The recent commit
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=d99ce933 (which
> also made it into v219-stable at
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable/commit/?h=v219-stable&id=b238b0eaf71)
> fixed a typo in u
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, at 11:13 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> What does "networkctl status" say when this happens? And "networkctl
> status -a"?
Oooh, I love those commands. Here is the output which says I'm routable:
http://s.natalian.org/2015-04-08/networkctl.txt
Maybe all of this has someth
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:06:33PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On 07-04-15 13:46, David Herrmann wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> The series looks re
В Wed, 08 Apr 2015 10:31:18 +0800
Kai Hendry пишет:
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, at 11:13 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > What does "networkctl status" say when this happens? And "networkctl
> > status -a"?
>
> Oooh, I love those commands. Here is the output which says I'm routable:
>
> http:/
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 05:41:48PM -0700, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 6 April 2015 at 01:12, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 06.04.15 06:17, 임창근 (ck21...@samsung.com) wrote:
> >
> >> Hello EveryOne.
> >>
> >> I wonder that If I use kernel v3.4 with systemd v219, systemd-run function
> >
79 matches
Mail list logo
