Yes. It makes sence.
Thanks,
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Tom Gundersen [mailto:t...@jklm.no]
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 3:20 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: Lennart Poettering; systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Belkind, Nadav
Subject: Re: networkd: dbus API for networkd reconfiguration
,
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 7:34 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Tom Gundersen; Belkind, Nadav
Subject: Re: networkd: dbus API for networkd reconfiguration at run-time
On Thu
Hi guys,
Any updates on this one ?
Thanks,
Alin
From: Rauta, Alin
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 1:57 PM
To: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Tom Gundersen; lenn...@poettering.net
Cc: Belkind, Nadav
Subject: networkd: dbus API for networkd reconfiguration at run-time
Hi Tom, Lennart,
I have
Hi Tom, Lennart,
I have some questions regarding dbus API and run-time networkd configuration. I
would really appreciate your answers/suggestions.
First, when upstreaming BridgeFDB support in networkd, I had (in the first
place) a patch composed of 2 parts:
- One part for clearing
Hi Tom,
Nice. Thanks,
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Tom Gundersen [mailto:t...@jklm.no]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 9:45 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: systemd Mailing List; Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] libsystemd doesn't handle properly empty
messages from kernel
Hi
Thank you.
/Alin
-Original Message-
From: Tom Gundersen [mailto:t...@jklm.no]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 7:05 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v4] Added support for Uplink Failure
Detection using
Can we please draw a conclusion in this case ?
Regards,
Alin
-Original Message-
From: systemd-devel [mailto:systemd-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On
Behalf Of Rauta, Alin
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:37 AM
To: Tom Gundersen
Cc: Kinsella, Ray; systemd-devel
to it.
Best Regards,
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Tom Gundersen [mailto:t...@jklm.no]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:27 AM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: lenn...@poettering.net; zbys...@in.waw.pl;
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Added support for Uplink
Hi Tom, Lennart, Zbyszek,
Did you have any chance to look at this patch version ?
Best Regards,
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Rauta, Alin
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 12:07 PM
To: t...@jklm.no; lenn...@poettering.net; zbys...@in.waw.pl
Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
sw0p1
#
Best Regards,
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [mailto:zbys...@in.waw.pl]
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 3:34 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: Tom Gundersen; Lennart Poettering; systemd Mailing List; Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Added support
Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Cc: Rauta, Alin; Lennart Poettering; systemd Mailing List; Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Added support for Uplink Failure Detection using
BindCarrier
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:27:07PM
Hi Tom,
Any news on this ?
Best Regards,
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 6:03 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: zbys...@in.waw.pl; t...@jklm.no; systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re
-Original Message-
From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 6:03 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: zbys...@in.waw.pl; t...@jklm.no; systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Added support for Uplink Failure Detection using
-Original Message-
From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 4:54 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: zbys...@in.waw.pl; t...@jklm.no; systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Added support for Uplink Failure Detection using
Yes, since the concept of UFD group is not exposed.
/Alin
-Original Message-
From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
Sent: Monday, February 2, 2015 5:24 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: Andrei Borzenkov; Tom Gundersen; Kinsella, Ray; systemd Mailing List
Subject: Re: [systemd
Hi Lennart,
I agree that BindCarrier= should suffice.
Best Regards,
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 10:50 AM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: Andrei Borzenkov; Tom Gundersen; Kinsella, Ray; systemd Mailing List
Subject
...@poettering.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 6:59 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: Andrei Borzenkov; Tom Gundersen; Kinsella, Ray; systemd Mailing List
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Added UFD (Uplink failure detection)
support to networkd
On Wed, 28.01.15 17:18, Rauta, Alin (alin.ra
: Thursday, January 29, 2015 12:14 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: Lennart Poettering; Tom Gundersen; Kinsella, Ray; systemd Mailing List
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Added UFD (Uplink failure detection)
support to networkd
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Rauta, Alin alin.ra...@intel.com wrote:
Hi
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 12:20 PM
To: Lennart Poettering
Cc: Rauta, Alin; Kinsella, Ray; systemd Mailing List
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Added UFD (Uplink failure detection)
support to networkd
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn
can use only BindCarrier= ?
Please let me know what you think.
Best Regards,
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 9:26 PM
To: Tom Gundersen
Cc: Rauta, Alin; Kinsella, Ray; systemd Mailing List
Subject: Re
Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 1:53 PM
To: Andrei Borzenkov
Cc: Rauta, Alin; Kinsella, Ray; systemd Mailing List
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Added UFD (Uplink failure detection)
support to networkd
On Wed, 28.01.15 16:48, Andrei Borzenkov
Hi Johann,
Also, note that VlanId is optional. It makes more sense for switch ports.
Regarding my “em1” (Ethernet management) interface, probably I should have send
an example without VLANId.
And “BridgeFDB”s are in the .network following the logic of routes.
To be clear look at the outputs
Thanks Tom.
Much appreciated,
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Tom Gundersen [mailto:t...@jklm.no]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 2:46 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: systemd Mailing List; Lennart Poettering; Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Add FDB support
Hi Alin,
Looks good. I changed
Regards,
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Tom Gundersen [mailto:t...@jklm.no]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 5:49 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: Lennart Poettering; systemd Mailing List; Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v2] Add FDB support
Hi Alin,
Thanks for the patch!
Overall
Sorry, between systemd restarts.
/Alin
-Original Message-
From: Tom Gundersen [mailto:t...@jklm.no]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 3:56 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: Lennart Poettering; systemd Mailing List; Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v2] Add FDB support
On Tue, Dec
fdb and entry association is non-googlable, but bridgeFDB is. It will get
you exactly where you want.
-Original Message-
From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [mailto:zbys...@in.waw.pl]
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 12:20 AM
To: Lennart Poettering
Cc: Rauta, Alin; Kinsella, Ray
no impact on [FDBNeigh] sections
/Alin
-Original Message-
From: Rauta, Alin
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 4:58 PM
To: Lennart Poettering
Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Kinsella, Ray
Subject: RE: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add FDB support
Hi Lennart,
Thanks for your
, Alin
Cc: 'systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org'; Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add FDB support
On Fri, 12.12.14 09:07, Rauta, Alin (alin.ra...@intel.com) wrote:
What do you think about the following transformations:
[FDBEntry] = [FDBNeigh]
We try to avoid
Hi,
[BrigdeFDB] can be also fine. It's just that [BridgeFDB] makes you think at the
entire forwarding database table and you are actually defining only one entry.
[BridgeFDBEntry] makes you think at just one entry in that table.
/Alin
-Original Message-
From: systemd-devel
, 2014 4:41 PM
To: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add FDB support
On 12/12/2014 04:12 PM, Rauta, Alin wrote:
Hi,
[BrigdeFDB] can be also fine. It's just that [BridgeFDB] makes you think at
the entire forwarding database table and you are actually
) and adds those specified in the FDBEntry section(if any).
Do you have any other suggestion for [FDBEntry] ?
Best Regards,
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 4:16 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: systemd-devel
Hi Johann,
If FDBControlled is no then we don't want to touch the forwarding database
table for this port.
If it's yes, then we want to control the FDB table (delete existing entries).
[Install] section can be an alternative. What about FDB=enable ? - in case we
want to add something else to
Hi,
We got the following error when running systemd on a device with many ports:
rtnl: kernel receive buffer overrun
Event source 'rtnl-receive-message' returned error, disabling: No buffer space
available
I think the kernel socket receive buffer queue should be increased. The default
value
33 matches
Mail list logo
