Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Removed PPC 32 bit LE architecture

2014-08-14 Thread Samuli Suominen

On 11/08/14 17:14, Lennart Poettering wrote:
 On Mon, 11.08.14 15:57, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:

 On Fri, 08.08.14 17:00, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote:

 From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com

 According to Brent Baude bba...@redhat.com, who provided the patch,
 IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all.
 What is support supposed to mean? Does that mean that the silicon for
 PPC32LE has and will never exist? Or does this mean that they are simply
 not interested in supporting Linux on ppc32le like this with support
 employees and stuff?

 I think if the silicon exists and people play around with it, we should
 keep the thing probably. However, if this is a theoretic architecture
 only, then let's kill it.
 Judging by this it's something that actually exists:

 http://lwn.net/Articles/408051/

 Hence I think we should leave the arch in... 

 Lennart


Thanks.

(As in, it's supported arch in Gentoo)
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Removed PPC 32 bit LE architecture

2014-08-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 08.08.14 17:00, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote:

 From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
 
 According to Brent Baude bba...@redhat.com, who provided the patch,
 IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all.

What is support supposed to mean? Does that mean that the silicon for
PPC32LE has and will never exist? Or does this mean that they are simply
not interested in supporting Linux on ppc32le like this with support
employees and stuff?

I think if the silicon exists and people play around with it, we should
keep the thing probably. However, if this is a theoretic architecture
only, then let's kill it.

 ---
  src/shared/architecture.h | 5 -
  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/src/shared/architecture.h b/src/shared/architecture.h
 index 71c79b1..2bbfb8a 100644
 --- a/src/shared/architecture.h
 +++ b/src/shared/architecture.h
 @@ -90,13 +90,8 @@ Architecture uname_architecture(void);
  #define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE  powerpc64le-linux-gnu
  #  endif
  #elif defined(__powerpc__)
 -#  if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
  #define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_PPC
  #define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE powerpc-linux-gnu
 -#  else
 -#define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_PPC_LE
 -#error Missing LIB_ARCH_TUPLE for PPCLE
 -#  endif
  #elif defined(__ia64__)
  #  define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_IA64
  #  define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE ia64-linux-gnu


Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Removed PPC 32 bit LE architecture

2014-08-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 11.08.14 15:57, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:

 On Fri, 08.08.14 17:00, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
 
  From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
  
  According to Brent Baude bba...@redhat.com, who provided the patch,
  IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all.
 
 What is support supposed to mean? Does that mean that the silicon for
 PPC32LE has and will never exist? Or does this mean that they are simply
 not interested in supporting Linux on ppc32le like this with support
 employees and stuff?
 
 I think if the silicon exists and people play around with it, we should
 keep the thing probably. However, if this is a theoretic architecture
 only, then let's kill it.

Judging by this it's something that actually exists:

http://lwn.net/Articles/408051/

Hence I think we should leave the arch in... 

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Removed PPC 32 bit LE architecture

2014-08-11 Thread Brent Baude
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 15:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
 On Fri, 08.08.14 17:00, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
 
  From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
  
  According to Brent Baude bba...@redhat.com, who provided the patch,
  IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all.
 
 What is support supposed to mean? Does that mean that the silicon for
 PPC32LE has and will never exist? Or does this mean that they are simply
 not interested in supporting Linux on ppc32le like this with support
 employees and stuff?
 
 I think if the silicon exists and people play around with it, we should
 keep the thing probably. However, if this is a theoretic architecture
 only, then let's kill it.
 
  ---
   src/shared/architecture.h | 5 -
   1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
  
  diff --git a/src/shared/architecture.h b/src/shared/architecture.h
  index 71c79b1..2bbfb8a 100644
  --- a/src/shared/architecture.h
  +++ b/src/shared/architecture.h
  @@ -90,13 +90,8 @@ Architecture uname_architecture(void);
   #define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE  powerpc64le-linux-gnu
   #  endif
   #elif defined(__powerpc__)
  -#  if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
   #define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_PPC
   #define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE powerpc-linux-gnu
  -#  else
  -#define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_PPC_LE
  -#error Missing LIB_ARCH_TUPLE for PPCLE
  -#  endif
   #elif defined(__ia64__)
   #  define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_IA64
   #  define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE ia64-linux-gnu
 
 
 Lennart
 

Yeah it does technically exist as your follow up email suggests.  Nobody
at IBM is interested in supporting it.  So I am cool with leaving it in.

Brent

___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Removed PPC 32 bit LE architecture

2014-08-09 Thread Dan Horák
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 17:40:40 +0200
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:

 On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:00:11PM +0200, har...@redhat.com wrote:
  From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
  
  According to Brent Baude bba...@redhat.com, who provided the patch,
  IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all.
 They might now want to support it, but we might want to have the tuple
 anyway.

I think there is no problem with keeping the 32-bit LE triplet, even
when it makes very little sense to actually do such distro


Dan

 Zbyszek
 
  ---
   src/shared/architecture.h | 5 -
   1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
  
  diff --git a/src/shared/architecture.h b/src/shared/architecture.h
  index 71c79b1..2bbfb8a 100644
  --- a/src/shared/architecture.h
  +++ b/src/shared/architecture.h
  @@ -90,13 +90,8 @@ Architecture uname_architecture(void);
   #define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE  powerpc64le-linux-gnu
   #  endif
   #elif defined(__powerpc__)
  -#  if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
   #define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_PPC
   #define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE powerpc-linux-gnu
  -#  else
  -#define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_PPC_LE
  -#error Missing LIB_ARCH_TUPLE for PPCLE
  -#  endif
   #elif defined(__ia64__)
   #  define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_IA64
   #  define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE ia64-linux-gnu
  -- 
  2.0.3
  
  ___
  systemd-devel mailing list
  systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
  http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
  
 ___
 systemd-devel mailing list
 systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Removed PPC 32 bit LE architecture

2014-08-08 Thread harald
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com

According to Brent Baude bba...@redhat.com, who provided the patch,
IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all.
---
 src/shared/architecture.h | 5 -
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/shared/architecture.h b/src/shared/architecture.h
index 71c79b1..2bbfb8a 100644
--- a/src/shared/architecture.h
+++ b/src/shared/architecture.h
@@ -90,13 +90,8 @@ Architecture uname_architecture(void);
 #define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE  powerpc64le-linux-gnu
 #  endif
 #elif defined(__powerpc__)
-#  if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
 #define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_PPC
 #define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE powerpc-linux-gnu
-#  else
-#define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_PPC_LE
-#error Missing LIB_ARCH_TUPLE for PPCLE
-#  endif
 #elif defined(__ia64__)
 #  define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_IA64
 #  define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE ia64-linux-gnu
-- 
2.0.3

___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Removed PPC 32 bit LE architecture

2014-08-08 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:00:11PM +0200, har...@redhat.com wrote:
 From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com
 
 According to Brent Baude bba...@redhat.com, who provided the patch,
 IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all.
They might now want to support it, but we might want to have the tuple
anyway.

Zbyszek

 ---
  src/shared/architecture.h | 5 -
  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/src/shared/architecture.h b/src/shared/architecture.h
 index 71c79b1..2bbfb8a 100644
 --- a/src/shared/architecture.h
 +++ b/src/shared/architecture.h
 @@ -90,13 +90,8 @@ Architecture uname_architecture(void);
  #define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE  powerpc64le-linux-gnu
  #  endif
  #elif defined(__powerpc__)
 -#  if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
  #define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_PPC
  #define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE powerpc-linux-gnu
 -#  else
 -#define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_PPC_LE
 -#error Missing LIB_ARCH_TUPLE for PPCLE
 -#  endif
  #elif defined(__ia64__)
  #  define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_IA64
  #  define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE ia64-linux-gnu
 -- 
 2.0.3
 
 ___
 systemd-devel mailing list
 systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
 
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel