RE: t-and-f: Re: empirical evidence

2001-04-30 Thread sean other
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jon Entine Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 11:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: t-and-f: Re: empirical evidence Richard: I've read most of what you site and what I wrote in no way

RE: t-and-f: Re: empirical evidence

2001-04-30 Thread malmo
; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: t-and-f: Re: empirical evidence Hi Malmo, So Jon knows nothing about running but knows something about training for running (double negative). As for pontification, your post seems to fit that bill quite well. As usual, the truth probably lies somewhere between

Re: t-and-f: Re: empirical evidence

2001-04-30 Thread Jon Entine
I must know something about running, having run five marathons. Maybe not as much as Malmo the magnificent. If you knew a little bit about the physiology of running, you would know that saying that 800 meters is not a distance event is silly. Kipketer made two points: he debunked the running

Re: t-and-f: Re: empirical evidence

2001-04-30 Thread Ed Dana Parrot
³I lived right next door to school,² laughs Wilson Kipketer, world 800-meter record holder, dismissing such cookie-cutter explanations. ³I walked, nice and slow. If they walked/ran ONE mile to school, they got a more exercise than the majority of American kids. Maybe Kipketer didn't, but

RE: t-and-f: Re: empirical evidence

2001-04-30 Thread Bruce Glikin
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jon Entine Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 8:48 AM To: malmo; Track and Field List Subject: Re: t-and-f: Re: empirical evidence I must know something about running, having run five marathons. -- Jon Entine

RE: t-and-f: Re: empirical evidence

2001-04-30 Thread Mcewen, Brian T
. if 800m is a distance event ... why isn't Wilson Kipketer running decent 1500's and 3k's? -Original Message- From: Jon Entine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 9:48 AM To: malmo; Track and Field List Subject: Re: t-and-f: Re: empirical evidence I must know

t-and-f: Re: empirical evidence

2001-04-29 Thread Jon Entine
, would dispute. On 4/29/01 12:59 PM, t-and-f-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:18:03 -0700 From: Richard McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: t-and-f: Empirical evidence Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:38:37 -0700 From: Jon Entine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: t-and-f

RE: t-and-f: Re: empirical evidence

2001-04-29 Thread malmo
the word serendipity while your at it. It's driving me (and Mr. Safire) nuts. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jon Entine Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 11:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: t-and-f: Re: empirical evidence Richard