... I've refrained so far from getting into this burgeoning discussion thread
... just 2 humble pleas though:
1. It is different in different countries. In England there are cycleways ...
typically part of long-distance non-urban routes that have been created either
primarily for cyclists or
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Steve Bennett wrote:
The asymmetry arises from the requirements of the modes of transport:
anything that a bike can ride on, a pedestrian can walk on - but not vice
versa.
except for the poor germans, who must not walk on a cycleway
2010/1/6, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
highway=path precisely fits your definition (in my mind) of narrowway.
So, use highway=path + access tags.
+1
highway=path is the long-existing and equally long misunderstood
solution to this osm problem. I don't get why some people hate it so
much
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
except for the poor germans, who must not walk on a cycleway
and the poor Austrians, Swiss, Turkish
and the poor Belarus, Belgians, Brazilians, French, Dutch if it is not
also designated for pedestrians or an alternative for
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
therefore, highway=footway, bicycle=designated means highway=cycleway,
foot=designated, which means highway=path, foot=designated,
bicycle=designated.
No, a highway=footway, bicycle=designated is not the same as
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Steve Bennett
Is it old as in, obsolete? Should we make an Australian entry, or is it no
longer relevant?
It is an old page because designation and default access is an old
topic and there is no black and white answer. In some countries,
when you tag a
2010/1/6 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
It is an old page because designation and default access is an old
topic and there is no black and white answer. In some countries,
when you tag a cycleway, it is obviously not allowed
Hi!
Am 06.01.2010 13:00, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com
Ok, so having created an entry for Australia
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Australia),
now does the above rule apply? That is, in Australia,
Hi!
Am 06.01.2010 07:15, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
The asymmetry arises from the requirements of the modes of transport:
anything that a bike can ride on, a pedestrian can walk on - but not
vice versa.
Anyway, with the
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
therefore, highway=footway, bicycle=designated means highway=cycleway,
foot=designated, which means highway=path, foot=designated,
bicycle=designated.
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com writes:
As for the shields this is deviating from the topic at hand but for it
the shield can be derived from the lookup table on the wiki and then
extra preprossesing in osm2pgsql to assign a shield based on admin
polygons + info from the lookup table
On 01/06/2010 07:10 AM, Nop wrote:
No it does not. This equality was originally intended in the path
proposal, but there is also a large fraction of mappers who use it
differently. Their argumentation is like this:
- designated means there is a sign
- in my country, when there is a sign,
As for the shields this is deviating from the topic at hand but for it
the shield can be derived from the lookup table on the wiki and then
extra preprossesing in osm2pgsql to assign a shield based on admin
polygons + info from the lookup table
What is the advantage in separating the
Mike N. nice...@att.net writes:
As for the shields this is deviating from the topic at hand but for it
the shield can be derived from the lookup table on the wiki and then
extra preprossesing in osm2pgsql to assign a shield based on admin
polygons + info from the lookup table
What is the
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
therefore, highway=footway, bicycle=designated means highway=cycleway,
foot=designated, which means highway=path, foot=designated,
bicycle=designated.
Yeah,
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
The biggest problem I can see at the moment is I really don't want to tag
anything bicycle=designated unless I'm certain it really *is* designated
that way (which I can't do from aerial photography), but I *do* want to
2010/1/7 Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net:
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com writes:
As for the shields this is deviating from the topic at hand but for it
the shield can be derived from the lookup table on the wiki and then
extra preprossesing in osm2pgsql to assign a shield based on
Hi there,
5 months ago I started scratching a new tag amenity=love_hotel [1].
Since there was no recent activity, I think it's time to call your
attention one more time to it and start voting. What do you think of
it? The page explains itself (I think), but a love_hotel (motel in
Brazil,
2010/1/7 Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net:
You want to parse the wiki page from within osm2pgsql? I am not so sure
that's a good idea. I think it should read that information from a
local file (which can be updated from the wiki by an independent tool).
For all it matters, the raw wiki
2010/1/7 Arlindo Pereira openstreet...@arlindopereira.com
1: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Love_Hotel
I like your request and I think this is useful in Brazil. Did you mean you
wanted to start voting?
cheers,
Martin
___
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is useful in Brazil.
I have heard of such in Tokyo as well.
Niagara Falls NY USA has motels that specialize in 'honeymoon
specials' which are rather similar but cater to longer stays and
actually
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
Tag highway = cycleway for official cycleways and bicycle=yes if it's
allowed to have bicycles on footpaths somewhere. End of story. Yes, in
Heh, that makes about three people with very simple takes on the matter -
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Nop ekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
With cycleway it is mainly for bike with foot tolerated, so cycleway is
the equivalent of bike=designated, foot=yes.
Ok. To be absolutely clear: in Australia mainly for bike with foot
tolerated does not exist. Also, exclusively for
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com writes:
Well relations aren't ways, the ways go through/under/ buildings.
Do they? Did I miss something? Last I know is that they are rendered
on top of buildings even if they are on a lower layer.
Matthias
___
24 matches
Mail list logo
