Hi! Am 06.01.2010 13:00, schrieb Steve Bennett: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Pieren <[email protected] > Ok, so having created an entry for Australia > (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Australia), > now does the above rule apply? That is, in Australia, according to the > rules I've written, is "highway=path, bicycle=designated, > foot=designated" equivalent to "highway=cycleway"?
No, with 2xdesignated the way is equally dedicated to foot+bike. With cycleway it is mainly for bike with foot tolerated, so cycleway is the equivalent of bike=designated, foot=yes. But anyhow, it seems the monthly foot/bike/path discussion is on. So I'd invite you to check the point of views and discussions of previous instances and maybe contribute some to the summary page. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Consolidation_footway_cycleway_path bye Nop _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
