Re: [Tagging] Roadside maps

2010-05-17 Thread Steve Bennett
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:54 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: cautious than we need to be. Why do we consider what's written on a street sign to be a fact, but the same words written on a map to be copyrightable? And many similar examples. A map is a collection of facts, which

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-17 Thread antony.king
I've used 'smell' on the proposal; I think more people will know that word! As an aside, there's a playground viewer app here: http://ant.homelinux.net/maps/index.html which shows (as blue icons) any playgrounds created with the new schema. It's experimental at the moment, working with a

Re: [Tagging] Roadside maps

2010-05-17 Thread Andre Engels
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:54 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: cautious than we need to be. Why do we consider what's written on a street sign to be a fact, but the same words written on a map to be copyrightable? And many similar examples. A map is a collection of facts, which

Re: [Tagging] Roadside maps

2010-05-17 Thread Richard Welty
On 5/17/10 5:38 AM, Andre Engels wrote: On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:54 AM, John Smithdeltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: cautious than we need to be. Why do we consider what's written on a street sign to be a fact, but the same words written on a map to be copyrightable? And many similar

Re: [Tagging] Landuse border alignment

2010-05-17 Thread Seventy 7
Personally I'm starting to use multipolygons more and more - define a boundary once and reuse is as many times as needed by the landuses either side. Steve - Original Message - From: Pieren To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Landuse border

Re: [Tagging] Landuse border alignment

2010-05-17 Thread Jonas Minnberg
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Jonas Minnberg sas...@gmail.com wrote: I'm kind of considering if this is right or not - if a road is the divider between two landuses, is it still best to unglue it from the landuse(s) and

Re: [Tagging] Updated cross-renderer/editor support table

2010-05-17 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/5/17 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com: it doesn't seem to work for e.g. amenity=drinking_water (you list just Osmarender, but it is also displayed in Mapnik, the cyclemap and JOSM and probably others as well). cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing

[Tagging] Parking for businesses..

2010-05-17 Thread Tyler Gunn
I was using the OSM maps for my city on my Garmin recently and when I listed the parking POIs I noticed a whole slew of parking showing up in there; mainly unnamed.. It got me thinking why those are in there but then it dawned on me that in my area I've started adding in the parking lots and

Re: [Tagging] Landuse border alignment

2010-05-17 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/5/16 Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com: On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:29 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: IMHO yes, as natural is mainly about landcover (what you physically encounter on the spot) while landuse is about usage. If you want do some extremely detailed

Re: [Tagging] Landuse border alignment

2010-05-17 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/5/17 Pieren pier...@gmail.com: On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Jonas Minnberg sas...@gmail.com wrote: I'm kind of considering if this is right or not - if a road is the divider between two landuses, is it still best to unglue it from the landuse(s) and move it into one or the other?

Re: [Tagging] Roadside maps

2010-05-17 Thread John Smith
On 17 May 2010 21:00, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: the other issue, of course, is when the map contains mistakes, which may be intentional on the part of the map maker. in this latter case, they are likely there to create the copyright claim. Again, it depends on the

Re: [Tagging] Roadside maps

2010-05-17 Thread Anthony
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote: the other issue, of course, is when the map contains mistakes, which may be intentional on the part of the map maker. And then what about when the map mistakes become the commonly accepted name of the road, and then

[Tagging] Tagging communication transponders

2010-05-17 Thread John Smith
The ACMA (Australian Communications and Media Authority) just released a data set of communication transponder locations for TV and radio station, a lot of these share the same mast/tower however this proposed feature suggests using multiple nodes to indicate multiple transponders but this doesn't

Re: [Tagging] Tagging communication transponders

2010-05-17 Thread John Smith
On 18 May 2010 13:05, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote: Separate entities should be represented by separate OSM elements. Relations are groups of objects in which each object may take on a specific role, so I don't think this is appropriate here. You are grouping

Re: [Tagging] Parking for businesses..

2010-05-17 Thread Roy Wallace
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Tyler Gunn ty...@egunn.com wrote: From http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parking: The distinction between public parking lots, customer parking lots (such as at cinemas etc.), and private parking lots (such as for staff in a business park) is handled with