On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
On 11/27/2013 09:33 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
I think we need solutions to high density office mapping, though - and
OSM as it is today is not a great fit.
Does OSM want to be a directory ?
No.
A shop is a
Hi Robin,
Thank you for your efforts.
Could you give some more information on this proposal? In particular,
what kind of POI would use this? How would you expect software for
example (OsmAND) to use it? Have you discussed this with entities that
currently support opening_hours? Is the scheme
Hi,
I had to tag the simplest thing there is: a parking lot closed a few
hours on Fridays (during market time).
On wiki.osm.org/wiki/Opening_hours,
I found explanations by, rather than a simple diagram, a lot of
examples and explanations sometimes nearing slang
Dear André,
Also being new to OSM and new to the tagging mailing list, I completely
understand your frustration. And I also believe that a lot of people left OSM
because even if they try hard, the don't get it right.
On the other hand, I also understand the people being involved for a long
+1
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 28/11/2013 15:32, nounours wrote:
Dear André,
Also being new to OSM and new to the tagging mailing list, I
completely understand your frustration. And I also believe that a lot
of people left OSM because even if they try hard, the don't get it right.
On the
2013/11/28 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
And now, probably in thanks for my contribution, my diagram was adorned
with this:
[image: Warning] http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/File:Ambox_warning_pn.svg
The syntax diagram below had no proper discussion and vote, and
conflicts with
On 11/28/13 11:05 AM, Martin Vonwald wrote:
Removed the inappropriate warning and added a hopefully neutral
statement. If something is wrong with the diagram everyone is invited
to a) either fix it or b) add a short note that some special/complex
case isn't covered by the simplified diagram
I have to my surprise not been able to find any established practice for
tagging webcams on internet. I am thinking of cameras that display a
place, so you can click in to see the weather, snow conditions and such.
As a service to the public, not to Big Brother. So I feel
man_made=surveillance
2013/11/28 Egil Hjelmeland pri...@egil-hjelmeland.no:
I have to my surprise not been able to find any established practice for
tagging webcams on internet. I am thinking of cameras that display a place,
so you can click in to see the weather, snow conditions and such. As a
service to the
Hi André,
Am Donnerstag, 28. November 2013, 16:15:39 schrieb André Pirard:
So, I thought that this fuzzy matter had to be be solved by writing a
simple syntax diagram. Should anything be wrong in it, someone would put
it right and it would be a good job jobbed and a big step forward.
If you
Hi Egil,
So I feel man_made=surveillance is wrong. Also I suspect most surveillance
cameras are not public on internet.
I think amenity=webcam is a good tag. Applies to node.
amenity is definitvely a bad choice. First, we should be careful to tag
everything with amenity. Second, an
On 28. nov. 2013 20:07, Dan S wrote:
2013/11/28 Egil Hjelmeland pri...@egil-hjelmeland.no:
I have to my surprise not been able to find any established practice for
tagging webcams on internet. I am thinking of cameras that display a place,
so you can click in to see the weather, snow conditions
12 matches
Mail list logo
