Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - traffic_signals (Lukas Schaus)

I know that I’m a little late with this comment – I missed this while reading the proposal. Sorry. Maybe that’s something that can be changed in the prososal – if current voters agree? 2015-02-09 17:29 GMT, Lukas Sommer : > I would strongly recommend to not use type=traffic_signals because we __

Re: [Tagging] Tram tracks running in a road

As I said before, it's simply a model. We have always drawn 1 way for each stretch of asphalt. We also draw 1 way per track. They sometimes overlap, but it turns out that this doesn't happen all that often. Maybe this is the reason why they decided to draw rails instead of tracks in the UrbIS data

Re: [Tagging] Tram tracks running in a road

On 9 February 2015 at 12:58, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2015-02-09 8:29 GMT+01:00 Markus Lindholm : >> The road isn't between the tracks. > you could understand this by looking at the width of the road. Doesn't seem to be an ideal solution to draw the objects in a way that differs from ground t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - traffic_signals (Lukas Schaus)

I would strongly recommend to not use type=traffic_signals because we have already a tag highway=traffic_signals. This would cause confusion. Furthermore, type=traffic_signals does not describe well what your prososal wants to do. With your relation, you don’t want to represent traffic signals but

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - traffic_signals (Lukas Schaus)

Am 09.02.2015 um 15:35 schrieb Lukas Schaus: > Hi, > > My proposal concerning the modelling of traffic signals is now open > for voting. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Traffic_Signals#Voting You did not comment on my question about micromapping a junction and adding a h

Re: [Tagging] courtyards

On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:14:17PM +0100, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > Courtyards use to be mapped as "inner" members of building multipolygons. We > can also use the multipolygon relation to assign a name to the bullding. If > we want to assign a name to the courtyard, we must assign it to the way.

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - traffic_signals (Lukas Schaus)

Hi, My proposal concerning the modelling of traffic signals is now open for voting. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Traffic_Signals#Voting Thank you ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetma

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - traffic_signals (Lukas Schaus)

Hi, My proposal concerning the modelling of traffic signals is now open for voting. Thank you ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] courtyards

Here's another variation: the courtyard of Limerick's Milk Market: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115572313 It was originally open at the top, but now has a canopy that covers most of it; and it's not a leisure facility. __John On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > On

Re: [Tagging] Tram tracks running in a road

W dniu 2015-02-09 o 12:50, Martin Koppenhoefer pisze: 2015-02-07 1:12 GMT+01:00 Jo >: Keep in mind it's only a model to represent reality. A model which uses lines for what in reality are areas, so whatever we do, it will never be a perfect fit. +1, wh

Re: [Tagging] Tram tracks running in a road

Am 08.02.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Janko Mihelić: > 2015-02-08 17:48 GMT+01:00 fly : >> Am 07.02.2015 um 11:19 schrieb Martin Vonwald: >>> 2015-02-07 0:31 GMT+01:00 Janko Mihelić : 2015-02-06 17:29 GMT+01:00 Luca Sigfrido Percich : > > We could also user a lanes modifier: > lanes=3 >>>

Re: [Tagging] Access restrictions for shoulder lanes?

Wikipedia seems to be incomplete on this; I'm presently unaware of any state that has a statewide prohibition. On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:22 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote: > On February 9, 2015 4:32:36 AM CST, Paul Johnson > wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Bryce Nesbitt >> wrote: >> >>>

Re: [Tagging] Access restrictions for shoulder lanes?

On February 9, 2015 4:32:36 AM CST, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Bryce Nesbitt > wrote: > > > In the USA occasional sections of even Interstate highways are open > to > > bicycles, > > where no equivalent route exists. There's some argument to tag these > as > > bike pat

Re: [Tagging] Tram tracks running in a road

2015-02-09 13:30 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald : > Just one quick question: are there any tags describing the track bed and > ties? > Here is a huge list of railway tags: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging There is embedded=yes/no/pavement/wood/metal/plastic which tells if the

Re: [Tagging] Tram tracks running in a road

Just one quick question: are there any tags describing the track bed and ties? 2015-02-07 11:19 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald : > 2015-02-07 0:31 GMT+01:00 Janko Mihelić : > >> I think this is the best way to tag this. There's a great map paint style >> for seeing roads in towns in JOSM, and it helps

Re: [Tagging] Tram tracks running in a road

2015-02-09 8:29 GMT+01:00 Markus Lindholm : > The road isn't between the tracks. > you could understand this by looking at the width of the road. > In my opinion it's better > to have two ways, one in each direction with highway and railway tags > on both. > -1 if the highway isn't a dual c

Re: [Tagging] Tram tracks running in a road

2015-02-08 22:32 GMT+01:00 Jo : > is it one asphalt way with one track? Then I agree. Or is it one asphalt > way with two tracks, one for each direction of the tram lines? Then I'd > draw 3 ways, 2 for the tracks, and 1 for the highway. > +1 ___ Taggin

Re: [Tagging] Tram tracks running in a road

2015-02-07 1:12 GMT+01:00 Jo : > Keep in mind it's only a model to represent reality. A model which uses > lines for what in reality are areas, so whatever we do, it will never be a > perfect fit. > +1, why not draw area:highway=* for the road areas to model that the trams run on the road and no

Re: [Tagging] Access restrictions for shoulder lanes?

2015-02-02 18:06 GMT+01:00 Paul Johnson : > parking:lane=emergency seems like a good value. emergency stops are typically not considered "parking". I don't think its a good idea to use something with "parking" for emergency lanes tagging. cheers, Martin ___

Re: [Tagging] Access restrictions for shoulder lanes?

2015-02-02 16:03 GMT+01:00 AYTOUN RALPH : > The highway=motorway already implies that there is two or more lanes plus > an emergency hard shoulder no, highway=motorway implies that it is a motorway. These can also have just one lane (exceptional case) and do not need to have a hard shoulder (al

Re: [Tagging] Access restrictions for shoulder lanes?

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:21 AM, fly wrote: > Am 06.02.2015 um 14:00 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt: > > In the USA occasional sections of even Interstate highways are open to > > bicycles, > > where no equivalent route exists. There's some argument to tag these as > > bike paths to avoid the tag soup of l

Re: [Tagging] Access restrictions for shoulder lanes?

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > In the USA occasional sections of even Interstate highways are open to > bicycles, > where no equivalent route exists. There's some argument to tag these as > bike paths to avoid the tag soup of lanes, > and ensure the (unusual) situation is

Re: [Tagging] Tram tracks running in a road

I like to have those tram tracks as long as possible. So I tend to only split them for the switches, where the route relations need it, or where the combination with highway tags 'needs' it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40283768/history 2015-02-09 9:13 GMT+01:00 Jo : > Hi Luca, > > Thank yo

Re: [Tagging] Tram tracks running in a road

Hi Luca, Thank you for letting me know. That was indeed an oversight. I fixed it by removing the tags from the little highway part, then combining that way with the railway=tram. There are no bus lines that are passing that part, so it's enough to have it as railway tram. It took many hours to inc