Hi Peterkrauss,
I second the need you mention of a relation in a whole.
Wikidata references should be unique as possible in the db.
Using route or site relations when appropriate is a good solution.
All the best
François
2018-08-06 23:10 GMT+02:00 peterkrauss :
> Hi,
>
> Seems a commom qualit
Hi,
Seems a commom quality problem of part/whole confusion in the Wikidata
attribution or OSM's POI reference... And where there are a need for
"enveloping parts into a whole".
Example:
* The railway-whole concept, Anhalt Railway
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q319837
* The railway-parts
On 05/08/18 19:10, Nick Bolten wrote:
I've run into this issue as well, many times, and it's like I said:
the 'name' tag is meant to answer the question 'what is the name of
this thing?', sidewalks themselves usually don't have names, and the
street name isn't the name of the sidewalk.
When t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On August 6, 2018 2:02 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/08/18 15:27, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > On Au
In my area there are signed routes for tsunami evacuation. Very unlikely that
they will change for an individual event. And the are ground verifiable as they
are signed. I think these can and should be mapped in OSM.
There are also wildfire prone areas near by. Evacuations from those are ad hoc.
On 06.08.2018 05:59, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> I like the idea of adding the sidewalk to the associatedStreet relation,
> perhaps role=sidewalk?
Streets can branch into an arbitrarily complex network where all the
branches still share the same name. A single relation containing all
streets and sidewa
OpenEmergencyMap?
06-08-2018 09:19 tarihinde Warin yazdı:
>
> I think it is 'plan a' that some committee comes up with.
> Some times they work.
> But what happens in a 'real emergency' may not reflect the plan (a, b,
> c or etc)
>
> Best if the people on the ground don't panic and think.
> If yo
> Generally properties on the main highway are often a more useful
> representation than dedicated ways, but if you go into details it can be
> better to have a dedicated way (or you will have to split the main highway
> into lots of tiny fragments just because of properties of the sidewalks
> chan
sent from a phone
> On 5. Aug 2018, at 20:58, SelfishSeahorse wrote:
>
> Because a sidewalk is a part of a road (like a separate carriageway),
> i think that it should also be tagged with the name of the road.
I agree that the name of the street also applies to its sidewalk and cycleways.
A
El sáb., 4 ago. 2018 a las 7:29, Martin Koppenhoefer (<
dieterdre...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 4. Aug 2018, at 01:43, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > As this is not a 'landuse' but a landcover I think moving it to
> landcover=clearing would be a good first
10 matches
Mail list logo
