Re: [Tagging] RFC amenity=student_accommodation

2020-02-28 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 at 15:55, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > Note that landuse=residential is commonly used with a name=* tag to > map named apartment complexes which have several buildings, in > California, Singapore and Indonesia at least. > & Australia as well > > Here we also have many

Re: [Tagging] RFC amenity=student_accommodation

2020-02-28 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
I don't see a clear distinction between student accommodations and other residential areas. In California there are many "mini-dorms" and private student housing buildings which are not located on the University campus or operated by the university. Would theybe tagged

Re: [Tagging] Public refrigerators

2020-02-28 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
> amenity=social_facility Most amenity=social_facility features are large "facilities" like a homeless shelter or nursing home or hospice. I don't think that tag is appropriate for a refrigerator. -- Joseph Eisenberg On 2/29/20, Jmapb wrote: > On 2/26/2020 4:32 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:

Re: [Tagging] Mapping pumps

2020-02-28 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
+1 for man_made=pump, man_made=fuel_pump or man_made=water_pump for an individual pump, depending on what you are looking at. Use man_made=pumping_station for a large facility probably with several pumps: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=pumping_station

Re: [Tagging] Public refrigerators

2020-02-28 Thread Jmapb
On 2/26/2020 4:32 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: On 26. Feb 2020, at 08:56, Markus Peloso wrote: The amenity=give_box tag is specific for sharing and reusing none food items. Please do not use it for food sharing +1, although these are somehow similar features from a certain point of view,

Re: [Tagging] Mapping pumps

2020-02-28 Thread Warin
On 29/2/20 9:51 am, François Lacombe wrote: Hi all, One simple question : according to you, what is the most suitable key to use to map pumps? A device intended to raise pressure level of any fluid. man_made=pump why not amenity=pump not at all pipeline=pump pumps aren't always related to a

Re: [Tagging] Annual Shows

2020-02-28 Thread Warin
The problem ??? A 'show' is an event. Assume that the place is tagged correctly. How would an event be tagged? I think for me the best fit is as a node - that sits within the area where it is held. The some tags such as; event:date=easter/xmass/25 Dec/*

[Tagging] Mapping pumps

2020-02-28 Thread François Lacombe
Hi all, One simple question : according to you, what is the most suitable key to use to map pumps? A device intended to raise pressure level of any fluid. man_made=pump why not amenity=pump not at all pipeline=pump pumps aren't always related to a pipeline (but would be a relevant add beside

Re: [Tagging] Annual Shows

2020-02-28 Thread John Sturdy
I'd call such a place a "fairground" or "showground", but I'm not sure whether it would come under "tourism", "leisure", or "amenity". I'm not so keen on "landuse" for it, as the land may also be used for something else. A particular example is the Cappamore Agricultural Show in Ireland; its

Re: [Tagging] Annual Shows

2020-02-28 Thread John Willis via Tagging
> On Feb 28, 2020, at 12:58 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> this would interfere the least with existing mapping. > I think existing mapping would ignore the tagging completely. If people are tagging for the renderer by naming Landuse features or amenities the name of the

Re: [Tagging] Annual Shows

2020-02-28 Thread John Willis via Tagging
> On Feb 28, 2020, at 12:58 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why limited to outdoor only? Because then we would just be mapping events held inside event halls. They are not worth mapping because they do not alter the OSM data. If a farmland becomes a parking lot, if a road

Re: [Tagging] RFC amenity=student_accommodation

2020-02-28 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Feb 28, 2020, 18:49 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > Am Fr., 28. Feb. 2020 um 18:43 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <> > tagging@openstreetmap.org> >: > >> name and operator may be tagged >> also on landuse >> > > > IMHO it doesn't make a lot of sense > Why? For named residential

Re: [Tagging] RFC amenity=student_accommodation

2020-02-28 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Fr., 28. Feb. 2020 um 18:43 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org>: > name and operator may be tagged > also on landuse > IMHO it doesn't make a lot of sense, and it isn't typically done (have a look at landuse=residential, and get rid of those that

Re: [Tagging] RFC amenity=student_accommodation

2020-02-28 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
name and operator may be tagged also on landuse 28 Feb 2020, 18:40 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > Am Fr., 28. Feb. 2020 um 16:50 Uhr schrieb Захаренков Алексей <> > a-z...@yandex.ru> >: > >> Hi. >>   >> My dictionary places 'student accommodation' into the series of synonyms >> 'student

Re: [Tagging] RFC amenity=student_accommodation

2020-02-28 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Fr., 28. Feb. 2020 um 16:50 Uhr schrieb Захаренков Алексей < a-z...@yandex.ru>: > Hi. > > My dictionary places 'student accommodation' into the series of synonyms > 'student residence, student hostel, student dormitory, student > accommodation'. > > I think the proposal is about a type of

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

2020-02-28 Thread Peter Elderson
+1 for stating more clearly What to map and What NOT to map. The first goal of the proposal, I think, is to separate the main (linear or circular) route from the extras, for display and some data use (e.g. export, length calculation and elevation profile). Then render the extras as dashed route

Re: [Tagging] RFC amenity=student_accommodation

2020-02-28 Thread Захаренков Алексей
Hi. My dictionary places 'student accommodation' into the series of synonyms 'student residence, student hostel, student dormitory, student accommodation'. I think the proposal is about a type of landuse. 'landuse=residential+residential=university' is used somewhat 340 times. What about to

Re: [Tagging] changing tables for adults (restroom accessibility feature)

2020-02-28 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Feb 28, 2020, 10:57 by hol...@sozialhelden.de: > Dear tagging-mailinglist, > > in the German user forum [1] and the talk mailinglist [2] we discussed how > changing tables for adults could be mapped. One suggestion was > changing_table:adult=yes/no. I learnt that for such a sub-category a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

2020-02-28 Thread Andrew Harvey
I agree with Peter, it'll probably be better to start with the basics, get that approved so at least there is some improvement, then move forward with the more complicated parts of the proposal. In terms of the role names proposed I noticed that it is a very similar to a schema I came up with for

Re: [Tagging] Clarify explicit abstention when voting on a proposal

2020-02-28 Thread Markus
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 20:29, Paul Allen wrote: > > Wikipedia is not noted for its consistency. From > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstention > > Abstentions do not count in tallying the vote negatively or positively; when > members abstain, they are in effect attending only to contribute to

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

2020-02-28 Thread Peter Elderson
+1 for the last remark, but -1 for voting in its current state. Too many inconsistencies and unanswered questions, e.g. about directionality: conflicting backward/forward role definition and hierarchy resolution stuff (that is up to the data users; should IMO be kept only on the talk page). I

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

2020-02-28 Thread s8evq
Hello everyone, What is the status of this proposal? Should we go forward and start voting? Lots of people have added valuable information and insight. It would be a pity if this proposal yet again stays in "Draft" status for forever. On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 10:15:31 +, Michael Behrens wrote:

[Tagging] changing tables for adults (restroom accessibility feature)

2020-02-28 Thread Holger Dieterich
Dear tagging-mailinglist, in the German user forum [1] and the talk mailinglist [2] we discussed how changing tables for adults could be mapped. One suggestion was changing_table:adult=yes/no. I learnt that for such a sub-category a formal proposal may be too much, that's why I ask here: Is it

[Tagging] RFC amenity=student_accommodation

2020-02-28 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
I am reproposing the 2014 proposal for amenity=student_accommodation orginally proposed by user Hno and kindly ask for your comments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/amenity%3Dstudent_accommodation Cheers Martin ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - drinking_water:refill_scheme

2020-02-28 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
> What is the difference between a closed way and an area ? A closed way is the most common method of drawing an area. The other common type of area is a multipolygon relation. Shops and cafes and similar features are mapped as areas (or nodes) In the wiki, “can be used in ways” means linear

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Food sharing

2020-02-28 Thread Markus Peloso
Hi Hauke Thank you for your inputs (and warnings ;) ). Free choice is important to me. I added the covered=* tag to the list. And add contact:* as a possible combination. I see the list of combinations more as a suggestion/inspiration, so that useful (or preferred) combinations can always be

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - drinking_water:refill_scheme

2020-02-28 Thread European Water Project
Dear All, The wiki for key:drinking_water:refill has been created and has had already it's first improvements ! Thanks Joseph. Joseph, I noticed you removed "ways" as a preferred database entry to be tagged. What is the difference between a closed way and an area ? The three buildings which are