Re: [Tagging] We should stop using hyphens to denote address ranges

> Data consumers see these hyphenated house numbers as one address, as well. Is that a problem? An address range can be considered a single address. > Create an address node for each housenumber and place each node somewhere on the building outline (or inside the building) I don't think that's

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Green alley

> > Then it would be good idea to clearly > communicate this requirement in tags. > > official_green_alley? > > [...] > > Because if you introduce green_alley > tag with intention to use it only for > some green alleys then it will be confusing, > and tag will likely change meaning anyway. >

[Tagging] We should stop using hyphens to denote address ranges

Hello, I wanted to raise a concern about tagging house numbers on a building using a hyphen to denote the address range (e.g 33-55 Main Street). This is a bad idea because some areas in the United States and possibly elsewhere use hyphenated street numbers for individual dwellings.[1] Data

Re: [Tagging] new page for tree_lined=*

> On 15. Aug 2020, at 12:43, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > On 15. Aug 2020, at 07:32, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > > > I do see these issues with adding sidewalks and cycle paths, where we have > > a similar choice between mapping as separate objects or as road property. > > it is often perceived

Re: [Tagging] tourism=caravan_site versus tourism=camp_site: camping with a tent

On 15/8/20 10:54 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: But what do you do for a place, called a Camping Ground, that is a big area of grass, mostly without defined "pitches" & where you can camp anyway you like: sleep in your car; on the ground; in a tent / camper trailer / caravan / motorhome?

Re: [Tagging] oneway=yes on motorways

On 14/08/2020 17.57, António Madeira via Tagging wrote: In this section, I suggest changing the text: "These ways should all point direction of travel and be tagged with oneway=yes." to "These ways should all point

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Green alley

17 Aug 2020, 07:36 by 162...@gmail.com: > ***Ops: this feature is not currently subject to a vote. Wrong subject, sorry > all. Current status is RFC.*** > Thank you for your welcome. > > > >> Is it just about signposted and officially recognized places? >> Or is it supposed to be similar to

Re: [Tagging] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

sent from a phone > On 17. Aug 2020, at 05:51, Yves wrote: > > station:type is still available then. sure, I wrote: “ (I am not an expert for aerialway station types, but sooner or later someone will come along who is, and even if they decide to use “station” for these potential