[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Approved - Payment denominations

2022-10-24 Thread Michael Brandtner
Hi, the proposal has been approved. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Payment_denominations In the coming days, I will create wiki pages for the keys. I will also try to incorporate some of the comments by users who voted against the proposal or abstained from voting

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Payment denominations

2022-10-23 Thread Michael Brandtner
Hi, just a short reminder that today is the last day of voting for this proposal. Regards, Michael ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Payment denominations

2022-10-19 Thread Michael Brandtner
Hi Tom, Am 10.10.22 um 10:54 schrieb Tom Pfeifer: Accepting a particular coin or banknote is among short-living business policies that can change frequently and is often harder to observe than e.g. opening_hours. Thus they are difficult to maintain and likely to be outdated. In my opinion,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Payment denominations

2022-10-19 Thread Michael Brandtner
Hi Martin, Am 11.10.22 um 09:10 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: in Italy, one and two cent coins have been abolished, they are not accepted any more in shops, and while prices are still ending mostly with 9, the sum gets rounded. I guess this should not be mapped because the default? As for

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Payment denominations

2022-10-10 Thread Michael Brandtner
The proposal includes advice to only use this tag in shops that don't accept all denominations. For vending machines, on the other hand, it is very common to not accept all denominations, so the tag should/can always be added. Kind regards Michael

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Payment denominations

2022-09-24 Thread Michael Brandtner
Hi, I have written a proposal for adding information about the coins and banknotes that are accepted at a feature, especially vending machines, but in some cases also amenities and shops. I decided to make this an addition to the payment:*=* namespace and use the value format of the charge=*

[Tagging] What is a saltbox?

2020-02-12 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
Hi, we have a big inconsistency between different wiki pages and editors how we define the roof shape "saltbox".  1) A saltbox is a roof with a tilted part at left and right side and a flat part on top. This definition can be found at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings It

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Pedestrian lane

2019-11-03 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
The only pedestrian lane that I know, in my German hometown, is separated from the rest of the road by a solid line. So it's not legal for vehicles to drive on it. Michael  Am So., Nov. 3, 2019 at 8:20 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: sent from a phone > Il giorno 2 nov 2019, alle ore

Re: [Tagging] Billboard or something else

2019-10-30 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
Hi, I agree that advertising is not a fitting key. I could only find these:  https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=traffic_information_display  (18 uses)https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/highway=variable_message_sign  (9 uses) Michael Am Mi., Okt. 30, 2019 at 3:37 schrieb

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Approved - Utility markers

2019-10-28 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
Hi, should position=* be kept when retagging pipeline markers to the new scheme? If yes, then this tag should be added to the wiki documentation. Michael  Am So., Okt. 27, 2019 at 18:35 schrieb François Lacombe: Hi all, Voting of Utility markers proposal is now over and it was approved

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - amenity=power_supply

2019-07-03 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
to prevent overlap in case of different tags for them. Am 25.06.2019 um 13:32 schrieb Michael Brandtner via Tagging: I've now rewritten the whole proposal. To prevent overlap, the idea is now to incorporate all devices that provide electrical power under the same main tag. A problem I have

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - amenity=power_supply

2019-06-25 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
=charging_station). Am Samstag, 22. Juni 2019, 17:41:08 MESZ hat Michael Brandtner via Tagging Folgendes geschrieben: Thank you for your comments so far. I've now written a proposal. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/amenity%3Dpower_supply The definition (wording can surely

[Tagging] Tagging sockets

2019-06-25 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
ated_types#International_usage_of_Type_G) is missing. __John On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 2:45 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: On 23/06/19 01:39, Michael Brandtner via Tagging wrote: Thank you for your comments so far. I've now written a proposal. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/P

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - amenity=power_supply

2019-06-22 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
I didn't really want to include device charging into this, but it seems that my tag is too generic to prevent that. Maybe I should stop trying to combine the power supplies at camping grounds and marinas and instead go with amenity=shorepower?  Am So., Juni 23, 2019 at 3:44 schrieb

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - amenity=power_supply

2019-06-22 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
Thank you for your comments so far. I've now written a proposal. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/amenity%3Dpower_supply The definition (wording can surely be improved):" A place where you can get electrical power." I've not taken into account your discussion about different

Re: [Tagging] Idea for a new tag: amenity=power_supply

2019-06-22 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
I've found this Wikipedia page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shorepower There is no shore power tag in OSM yet. But now I'm uncertain if we should also make a difference between shore power and power supply for other uses. Am Fr., Juni 21, 2019 at 14:21 schrieb Michael Brandtner via

Re: [Tagging] Idea for a new tag: amenity=power_supply

2019-06-21 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
The sub-tag does already exist, I've linked to it in my original post (power_supply=). What doesn't exist is a main tag for tagging isolated columns for power supply. This image shows what I'm talking about:

[Tagging] Idea for a new tag: amenity=power_supply

2019-06-21 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
Hi, I'm thinking about (and in fact, have already used about two times) a new tag: amenity=power_supply. It is meant for mapping places where you can get electrical power for a fee. They can be found at camping grounds and harbours. They have sockets you can use to get power and you can pay

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - changing table

2019-05-22 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
I think that this is a language issue and the hallway (German "Flur") is meant, not the floor. Am Dienstag, 21. Mai 2019, 03:11:32 MESZ hat marc marc Folgendes geschrieben: Hello, > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/changing_table questions / minor suggestions

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Baby changing table

2019-04-26 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
I’m against the tag baby_changing_table. As I have already written, changing_table is unambiguous and the most common word for this thing. No need for such a long key. Am Donnerstag, April 25, 2019, 10:52 PM schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer : sent from a phone > On 22. Apr 2019, at 01:49, marc

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Baby changing table

2019-04-22 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
I don' think we should use no, but private. But as others have stated, I can't really think of a changing table that should be mapped in osm but isn't accessible even for customers.  But us this really a point we need to discuss? Can't we just say that changing_table:access should be used with

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Baby changing table

2019-04-21 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
Even if there is an extra room, there will be a changing table in it. and the bench is a substitute for a changing table. So I don't find this tag limiting. Of course there will be also a bin and a washing basin in such a room. But the table is the most important feature, similar to

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Baby changing table

2019-04-21 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
 changing_table seems to be the most common term so we should use it. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/changing%20tablehttps://www.dictionary.com/browse/changing-table   Gesendet von Yahoo Mail für iPad Am Sonntag, April 21, 2019, 9:12 AM schrieb bkil : Here are some

Re: [Tagging] diaper subkey for wheelchair toilets including a changing table

2019-04-19 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
I’m not a native speaker but I don’t think there will be any confusion when using changing_table. I don’t know of any changing tables for adults outside of nursing homes. In case of need we can add changing_table:for=adults. Am Freitag, April 19, 2019, 11:06 PM schrieb marc marc : I

Re: [Tagging] Suggestion: ref:mobile_payment for amenity=parking

2018-12-05 Thread Michael Brandtner
I'm not sure how to proceed now. Should I create a proposal for this? Am Samstag, 1. Dezember 2018, 12:16:42 MEZ hat bkil Folgendes geschrieben: You have the choice to disagree with micromapping and ignore it. Many such decisions are made on a local level, for example when executing

Re: [Tagging] Suggestion: ref:mobile_payment for amenity=parking

2018-11-29 Thread Michael Brandtner
ayment:meal_vouchers=* and payment:electronic_purses=* that are used in-house at many places. << On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 9:29 AM Philip Barnes wrote: On 21 November 2018 12:45:30 GMT, Michael Brandtner wrote: Philip Barnes schrieb am 23:29 Dienstag, 20.November 2018: I am not 100

Re: [Tagging] Suggestion: ref:mobile_payment for amenity=parking

2018-11-21 Thread Michael Brandtner
Philip Barnes schrieb am 23:29 Dienstag, 20.November 2018: > I am not 100% sure that mobile payment is the correct term, that to me > implies using your phone for contactless payment. But wouldn't that be payment:contactless?  > The English term used in these cases is Pay by Phone. So your

Re: [Tagging] Suggestion: ref:mobile_payment for amenity=parking

2018-11-21 Thread Michael Brandtner
Am Dienstag, 20. November 2018, 23:32:40 MEZ hat marc marc Folgendes geschrieben: > it's a ref specific to this parking to be entered in an app ? > or a > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment#Payment_via_phone ? Yes, it's a ref specific to this parking lot to be entered into an

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Tramtrack_on_highway)

2018-11-21 Thread Michael Brandtner
I think I agree with Rainer: You propose to add a  "railway=" tag to a way that already has a "highway=" tag. So then why not just add "railway=tram" and delete the separate way? If this is not wanted (e.g. for rendering reasons) then I think we should use another tag instead of "railway=".

[Tagging] Suggestion: ref:mobile_payment for amenity=parking

2018-11-20 Thread Michael Brandtner
Hi, this is my first message to the mailing list, so bear with me if this is not the correct way for suggesting something like this. I'd like to make a change to the Wiki but wanted to get your opinions first. Many (most?) public parking lots in Germany have the possibility to pay via SMS or