Just a quick reminder, this hasn't had all that many votes so could you have
a look and vote to approve/reject the proposal?
Thank you,
Tom
On 12 April 2011 09:36, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
Hello,
I've moved this proposal to the vote, it has been open for discussion for a
few
Hello,
I've moved this proposal to the vote, it has been open for discussion for a
few months and has now been used in the wild for a similar period of time to
see how well it works in practice.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Vegetarian
On 21 February 2011 11:08, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At 2010-08-26 05:08, Tom Chance wrote:
On 26 August 2010 13:43, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote: ...
The source of energy used (generator:source) Combined with
'generator:method=fission' you have to add
On 15 February 2011 20:31, Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.comwrote:
Aren't attributes like that more suitable to describe a person than a
restaurant. I mean a person can follow a ovo-lacto diet, but find hard
to think there would be a restaurant where every meal on the menu
would be an
Hello,
Thank you for the feedback and suggestions so far, I have now moved this
from a draft to a proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Vegetarian
Please add any comments to the Discussion page.
Regards,
Tom
--
http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance
On 15 February 2011 00:39, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 18:53 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/2/14 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net:
AFAIK there is quite a lot of differentiation in the vegetarian
community (e.g. Ovo, lacto, ovo-lacto, veganism, raw
Hello,
Please read and comment on my draft proposal to improve our tagging of
vegetarian and vegan food:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Vegetarian
I want to use something more sophisticated than cuisine=vegetarian for
restaurants, cafes and shops.
Regards,
Tom
--
Hello,
Some time ago a proposal to change the way we specify types of power
generators was passed. Unfortunately, the German, Russian, French and
Japanese translations haven't been updated. I left requests on their
respective discussion pages but nothing has happened.
The original English page
On 22 November 2010 09:36, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 22.11.2010 10:26, schrieb Tom Chance:
Some time ago a proposal to change the way we specify types of power
generators was passed. Unfortunately, the German, Russian, French and
Japanese translations haven't been
On 22 November 2010 12:49, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Tom Chance wrote:
When that happens, the only logical course of action is to update the
wiki documentation showing the new tags and removing the
deprecated tags. It makes no sense to continue telling people about
Hello,
I have proposed a new landuse value - for land used for communal food
growing (different to farms and allotments):
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Community_food_growing
Please read the rationale in full and leave any comments. As usual, I
suspect there will be a
Further to the culture proposal discussions...
Can anyone tell me where the various theatre:genre tags were discussed, put
through the proposal process and voted on? I can only find evidence on the
wiki of the original proposal in 2006 for amenity=theatre (which I voted
for).
It looks like they
On 8 November 2010 08:24, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
Well, what is your definition of museum? I don't have to follow
slavishly wikipedia but I took this as a first indication.
This reminds me of turning to the dictionary for a definition of democracy
when debating
On 8 November 2010 08:35, Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.orgwrote:
Art galleries are not museums, they are shops. If an institution SELLS art
works, it has to expose them in order for potential buyers to see, so it is
shop=something. If it does NOT SELL, it is culture=museum (even if
On 8 November 2010 10:25, Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.orgwrote:
On Lunes 08 Noviembre 2010 10:09:03 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer escribió:
yes, we already have a shop value for art galleries that generally
sell the exposed works, but Tom was saying that we should distinguish
between
On 8 November 2010 10:53, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
I agree that places whose primary purpose is to sell prints, paintings by
local artists and framing services should be marked as shop=art.
Thin ice IMHO. You are saying that original art by local artists is
on the
On 8 November 2010 11:41, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/11/8 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net:
culture=art_gallery: a place where the primary purpose is the temporary
exhibition of art works for artistic appreciation
_and_ who nevertheless sell art? saatchi
On 8 November 2010 13:14, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
a gallery doesn't have to be a building by it self, it doesn't have
to be focused on selling (a false distinction in my book), it can
be 2 or 3 walls in a library
For the moment Martin's proposal doesn't offer anything for
On 7 November 2010 17:09, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/11/7 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net:
In general I like this proposal, but given that this changes a
substantial
number of very well used tags that go back to almost the beginning of the
project it is essential
Hello,
After bringing the tourism=gallery proposal to a long-overdue vote, I'd like
to see what people think about the other tags for arts (in the broadest
sense) venues. Looking around London, where there are thousands of arts
venues, we have some fairly confused tagging and a huge number of
On 6 November 2010 11:29, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/11/6 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net:
Should I tidy up the music_venue proposal and bring it to a vote under
the
tourism key
Is the current split between amenity / tourism about right?
no, it is completly
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dart
- This is not for museums that happen to have some art as part of their
collections
Regards,
Tom Chance
--
http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http
these new tags without breaking any existing
data. In the next few weeks I will try to contact others who have added a
lot of data, and advertise this new schema on my blog and the British
mailing list. Perhaps somebody could do the same if they are subscribed to
talk, talk-de, etc?
Best wishes,
Tom
Throwing my hat in like a true masochist...
I have added perhaps 100 trees - urban/rural, in 'clusters' and on streets
where I would not say there is a cluster but where they are closer than 50m.
I am also interested in an import from my local council.
The wiki is clearly ambiguous and not
On 8 September 2010 09:34, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/6 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net:
If you can do so without requiring that mappers happy with
generator:method=gasification be forced to instead enter a more
complicated
mixture of tags to describe those precise
On 8 September 2010 11:33, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote:
But your proposal is not a small change of the whole power=generator
system. A change of tagging for example a tidal power plant shoud not
be done every month. So it would be great if you can stop your
fighting to push the
Andre,
On 4 September 2010 15:11, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote:
There are still some mismatches between source and method.
e.g. generator:source=nuclear, generator:methode=fission
A nuclear fission do not creates electricity it only creates a steam
to power a turbine.
This is
On 6 September 2010 13:46, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/6 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net:
Nobody needs the tag to be
generator:method=fission-creating-steam-to-power-a-turbine-that-induces-an-electric-current,
or
generator:method=gasifiying-the-waste-municipal-wood
On 3 September 2010 23:16, Pierre-Alain Dorange pdora...@mac.com wrote:
Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
If voted through, I will look at updating existing data in OpenStreetMap.
I do not follow this discussion, but automatic data update is generally
not welcome on OSM.
It can/would
will look at updating existing data in OpenStreetMap. I
am currently working on a groundbreaking map of this for London:
http://tom.acrewoods.net/2010/08/28/low-carbon-power-in-openstreetmap
Regards,
Tom Chance
--
http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance
Hi there,
I want a way of creating an object for an energy generator and then saying
this is on top of / inside this building object. Here is an example of one
such object:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/35802300
I checked on the wiki page and couldn't see any established or proposed
On 28 August 2010 04:30, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.netalan_mintz%2b...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Is there a plan to convert the existing data?
I thought about that, but I'm not sure how to proceed. Any advice is
welcome!
I could, of course, just download all data tagged with the old
Martin,
Thank you for the feedback. One quick question for the list...
On 26 August 2010 18:22, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
the suggested semicolon for combinations is never evaluated by any
application (AFAIK).
I have been told two different things, now. Do we use
On 27 August 2010 10:49, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I would not recommend to design a proposal where it is predictable
that multiple values to one key will occur in this way. I was told
that it is unlikely that multiple values will be taken into account
because this is
. Hopefully it shouldn't
need too much extra tweaking following existing discussions.
Regards,
Tom Chance
--
http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
Thank you for these comments, André, I have updated the wiki page with some
amendments:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/generator_rationalisation
On 26 August 2010 13:43, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote:
The word 'generator:' is better than 'power:', but it is
On 17 August 2010 22:13, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.netalan_mintz%2b...@earthlink.net
wrote:
At 2010-08-17 12:08, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
I know that there are some bike lanes on the left side, but is there
any real benefit to tagging cycleway:right=lane rather than
cycleway=lane
On 16 August 2010 21:08, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/8/16 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net:
Basically I have deprecated power_type=photovoltaic and
power_type=solar-thermal, which combine two bits of information (source
of
energy, and type of energy generated). This also
enthusiasts want to change the name of the first proposal to
Proposed_features/power_output and do something with the deprecated
proposal currently occupying that URL, be my guest!
Regards,
Tom Chance
On 17 August 2010 08:44, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
On 16 August 2010 21:08, André
On 17 August 2010 12:56, Vincent Pottier vpott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/08/2010 12:59, Tom Chance wrote:
Just to help summarise, with these proposals we end up with:
power=generator (the starting point)
power_rating (to specify the watts generated)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
40 matches
Mail list logo
