Am Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:33:55 +0100
schrieb Stephan Knauss
:
> On 13.01.2016 23:46, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> > We currently use British English for almost all OSM tags. Jewellery
> > shops however are typically tagged with the American English variant
> > shop=jewelry
Am Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:32:56 +1100
schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
> I note the tag was
> never 'approved'.
> has had some discussion on the spelling aspect
Just a side note:
I'd assume that most of the major tags like highway=* never got
proposed nor voted on.
And seeing that maybe 30
I know it is about consistency, but for a data consumer that does not
matter, they still have to cope with the change in exactly the same
way as for power=sub_station -> power=substation. (which is also a
matter of consistency).
No gain and a lot of pain :-)
IMHO instead of discussing this
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Stephan Knauss wrote:
> On 13.01.2016 23:46, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
>>
>> We currently use British English for almost all OSM tags. Jewellery
>> shops however are typically tagged with the American English variant
>> shop=jewelry (20083
2016-01-14 9:24 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis :
> +1 to accept the current tagging. Please do not bother our data
> consumers with a change. No need to repeat the sub_station/substation
> story again.
>
please note that this is not similar to the power=sub_station / substation
Hi all,
We currently use British English for almost all OSM tags. Jewellery
shops however are typically tagged with the American English variant
shop=jewelry (20083 occurrences), and hardly ever with the British
English variant shop=jewellery (187 occurrences). Editors and data
consumers only
On 13.01.2016 23:46, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
We currently use British English for almost all OSM tags. Jewellery
shops however are typically tagged with the American English variant
shop=jewelry (20083 occurrences), and hardly ever with the British
English variant shop=jewellery (187
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 23:46:48 +0100
Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> All in all, it is a fairly large operation for a relatively small
> improvement, and I'm not sure if it's worth it. I wonder though what
> other mappers think. Would it make sense to switch the recommended
sent from a phone
> Am 13.01.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Matthijs Melissen :
>
> All in all, it is a fairly large operation for a relatively small
> improvement, and I'm not sure if it's worth it.
I support the idea of changing it and think the transition plan you propose