Am 02.11.2013 20:43, schrieb Fernando Trebien:
I know that in Germany and in Argentina roads are being classified
based primarily on administration level (national, regional, city,
etc.). Classifying like this probably works well when the entire road
system is well maintained.
In Brazil,
Hello fly,
Thank you for your concern. I'm glad we agree that classification is a
hard topic sometimes. First, the graph is intended for mapping within
Brazil and not overseas. I don't wanna delve too deeply in the details
of our discussion (it would probably be long, boring and maybe only
Hi Fernando
Still think you should not change the meaning of a key but use an
new/own key or even only a subkey for the other existing values
considering living_street. Actually, I am in favour of deprecating
living_street as it is already used for too many different cases and
wrong in concept
If we use a new key, no apps would support it, until the Brazilian
community grows enough to start building its own apps.
Indeed, as discussions progressed, we began associating importance
primarily with traffic intensity and less with city connectivity. But
again, we would have to measure
+1 (similar to our discussion here in Brazil)
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Jonathan bigfatfro...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry if I've not seen the old posts on this, the wiki pages are
contradictory which is why I asked the question.
In the UK we are defining Trunk or Primary based on some
This question is really aimed at UK roads but the same may apply to
other countries.
I'm not clear with the distinction of a Trunk road in the UK. The wiki
suggests a trunk road is high performance roads that don't meet the
requirement for highway
On 02/11/13 18:47, Jonathan wrote:
This question is really aimed at UK roads but the same may apply to
other countries.
I'm not clear with the distinction of a Trunk road in the UK. The wiki
suggests a trunk road is high performance roads that don't meet the
requirement for highway
I know that in Germany and in Argentina roads are being classified
based primarily on administration level (national, regional, city,
etc.). Classifying like this probably works well when the entire road
system is well maintained.
In Brazil, however, we had tons of discussions on how to do it and
Am 02/nov/2013 um 20:43 schrieb Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com:
I know that in Germany and in Argentina roads are being classified
based primarily on administration level (national, regional, city,
etc.).
in Germany they are not, don't know about Argentinia. The basic
Hm I may have misread about Germany then.
The mais problem we discussed here in Brazil is getting everyone to
agree with some vague subjective sense of importance, specially when
deciding between two somewhat similar classifications (such as between
secondary and tertiary).
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013
2013/11/2 Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com
Hm I may have misread about Germany then.
The mais problem we discussed here in Brazil is getting everyone to
agree with some vague subjective sense of importance, specially when
deciding between two somewhat similar classifications (such
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
btw, IMHO secondary are more similar to primaries than they are to
tertiaries, as both are long range connections, while tertiaries aren't
generally long range connections.
Brazilians could also decide that
2013/11/2 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
btw, IMHO secondary are more similar to primaries than they are to
tertiaries, as both are long range connections, while tertiaries aren't
generally long range connections.
Brazilians could also decide that they don't need trunk because they
don't have
13 matches
Mail list logo
