On 29 May 2015 at 14:16, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
This falls flat in areas where the postal service ignores the ground truth
and invents their own addresses (similarly: postal ZIPs versus census
ZIPs). Rural routes are just one example of this. I'd be more willing to
say
Depending on the country, state, area the address does not necessarily refer
to the building.
In Australia the address refers to the property ie the plot of ground that is
defined by the cadastral plan.
So those plots of ground may be 600 sq m or 1,000,000 hectares and may have
That's a circular definition. What is the actual difference between the
two types of address, in your model?
On 2015-05-29 02:27, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 28 May 2015 at 08:24, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Mike, what's a node address and what's an area address (without
Postcodes don't have addresses, but addresses can have postcodes. I say
can have and not have as addresses can exist without postcodes, for
example when the local authority has named the roads in a new estate but
the postcodes have not been allocated yet. You need to be able to talk
about
On 29 May 2015 at 11:43, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 2015-05-29 11:58, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 29 May 2015 at 07:34, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Only Royal Mail think Chepstow is in Gloucestershire, England. Normal
people think it is in Monmouthshire,
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:33 AM, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Did you ever look at the example that I've send you ? (probably not
because it doesn't fit in your idea of addresses)
Probably !
The house numbers are used to identity flats, not the building.
Now you're
On 29 May 2015 at 07:18, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
That's a circular definition. What is the actual difference between the
two types of address, in your model?
Only 1 type of address, just attached to a different type object.
--
Mike.
@millomweb
On 29 May 2015 at 10:56, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:33 AM, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Did you ever look at the example that I've send you ? (probably not
because it doesn't fit in your idea of addresses)
Probably !
The house
On 29 May 2015 at 07:34, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Postcodes don't have addresses, but addresses can have postcodes. I say
can have and not have as addresses can exist without postcodes, for
example when the local authority has named the roads in a new estate but
the
On 29 May 2015 at 06:14, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:39 AM, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Addresses are used to identify buildings. Not all buildings need to be
identified.
Did you ever look at the example that I've send you ? (probably
On 2015-05-29 11:58, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 29 May 2015 at 07:34, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Only Royal Mail think Chepstow is in Gloucestershire, England. Normal people
think it is in Monmouthshire, Wales. This is the correct postal address:
1 Bigstone Meadow
Tutshill
Zip codes, in the USA, are the same way. They are intended for the post
office's routing, and don't necessarily correspond to administrative
divisions of the land. A given plot of land may be in one administrative
division for tax purposes, yet be lumped into a neighboring division for
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 12:57 +0100, pmailkeey . wrote:
For some strange reason, RM chose settlements rather than counties to
determine postcodes.
They chose where the sorting offices were and from that where the lines
of communication went, that is why Market Bosworth (a long way inside
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:39 AM, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Addresses are used to identify buildings. Not all buildings need to be
identified.
Did you ever look at the example that I've send you ? (probably not because
it doesn't fit in your idea of addresses) The house
On 28 May 2015 at 08:24, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Mike, what's a node address and what's an area address (without
resorting to circular definitions)? I have never seen a flag for this in
any of the many address databases I have worked with.
Address on a node and address on
On 28 May 2015 at 09:49, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Addresses are just labels, with (in the general case) an N:M relation with
areas. Addresses are not used to identify buildings, as that would imply
that all buildings (even sheds and garages) would need their own address.
On 5/28/15 8:44 PM, pmailkeey . wrote:
Do explain
first problem - where google points
do you have any idea how many things are wrong with that statement?
the two big ones:
1) we must not depend on anything google does
2) google doesn't even reliably get it right
so handwaving where google
Do explain
On 29 May 2015 at 01:39, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 5/28/15 8:26 PM, pmailkeey . wrote:
Postcodes don't have addresses!
Where Google points, given that postcode, for a geographic address
Bigstone Meadow
Tutshill
Nr Chepstow
Gloucestershire
England
On 29 May 2015 at 01:50, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 5/28/15 8:44 PM, pmailkeey . wrote:
Do explain
first problem - where google points
do you have any idea how many things are wrong with that statement?
the two big ones:
1) we must not depend on anything google
On 28 May 2015 at 07:32, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
In the UK we have postal addresses which are for Royal Mail's convenience,
not yours. Often your (correct) postal address suggests you are in a
different town, and sometimes even a different country.
What would you call the
On 5/28/15 8:26 PM, pmailkeey . wrote:
Postcodes don't have addresses!
Where Google points, given that postcode, for a geographic address
Bigstone Meadow
Tutshill
Nr Chepstow
Gloucestershire
England
ummm, i think you have quite a bit to learn about geocoding.
richard
--
Hi Mike,
Here's the entrance
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-15.91204/135.52593
There's nothing mapped there but if you look at bing imagery you can see
where the access is.
Here's the approximate centroid
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-15.5677/135.7972
Cheers
Ross
On
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:39 AM, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Mike.
54.212404,-3.270514
In the UK we have postal addresses which are for Royal Mail's convenience,
not yours. Often your (correct) postal address suggests you are in a
different town, and sometimes even a different country.
What would you call the geographic address for NP16 7JU? The postal
address is Chepstow. It's not
Mike, what's a node address and what's an area address (without
resorting to circular definitions)? I have never seen a flag for this in
any of the many address databases I have worked with.
On 2015-05-28 02:04, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 28 May 2015 at 00:39, Eugene Alvin Villar
Am 28.05.2015 um 09:24 schrieb Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
Mike, what's a node address and what's an area address (without resorting
to circular definitions)? I have never seen a flag for this in any of the
many address databases I have worked with.
have you dealt with
Addresses are just labels, with (in the general case) an N:M relation
with areas. Addresses are not used to identify buildings, as that
would imply that all buildings (even sheds and garages) would need their
own address. In multi-occupancy buildings (apartments, shared offices
etc) each
On 2015-05-28 12:24, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-05-28 12:12 GMT+02:00 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
If you have a block of flats with 2000 people apparently living at the same
address, I can't imagine that a single, shared letter box will be enough.
Each apartment will have
2015-05-28 12:12 GMT+02:00 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
If you have a block of flats with 2000 people apparently living at the
same address, I can't imagine that a single, shared letter box will be
enough. Each apartment will have its own address.
Or are you talking about where each
On 2015-05-28 11:13, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-05-28 10:49 GMT+02:00 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
Addresses are just labels, with (in the general case) an N:M relation with
areas. Addresses are not used to identify buildings, as that would imply
that all buildings (even
2015-05-28 10:49 GMT+02:00 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
Addresses are just labels, with (in the general case) an N:M relation with
areas. Addresses are not used to identify buildings, as that would imply
that all buildings (even sheds and garages) would need their own address.
Also, large industrial facilities may have all mail delivered to a central
office, yet have separate street addresses for individual buildings for
delivering goods.
On May 28, 2015 9:21:44 AM Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
In the UK we have postal addresses which are for Royal
2015-05-27 11:03 GMT+02:00 Ross i...@4x4falcon.com:
But if you tagged it on the 1,000,000 hectare property and it was then
displayed at the centroid you'd never find the access to the property as
it's centroid is not even close to the road where the address is.
Yes, but more intelligent
On 27 May 2015 at 09:48, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 27.05.2015 um 09:38 schrieb Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
Also, the address must be unique
why?
Otherwise they make bad routing targets
/Markus
___
Tagging mailing
On 27/05/2015 7:33 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-05-27 11:03 GMT+02:00 Ross i...@4x4falcon.com
mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com:
But if you tagged it on the 1,000,000 hectare property and it was
then displayed at the centroid you'd never find the access to the
property as it's
Am 27.05.2015 um 11:59 schrieb Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
Using that logic the address should be on a node at the main visitor entry
... only visitors will need that level of detail .. regulars will make their
own way once in close proximity.
no, because there are other usecases
A block of flats will also have many addresses. Each individual
apartment will have its own. If there is a garage down the street which
is part of the property of the flat, you could say that the garage is
also part of the address. Things can get very messy...
Depending on the definition you
But if you tagged it on the 1,000,000 hectare property and it was then
displayed at the centroid you'd never find the access to the property as
it's centroid is not even close to the road where the address is.
The entrance is here:
http://binged.it/1Rn0nOY
but the centroid is about here:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Markus Lindholm
markus.lindh...@gmail.com wrote:
Otherwise they make bad routing targets
Complete addresses may indeed be unique, but the housenumber part
can be and is in may countries the same for, for example all
apartments in an apartment building. In other
Don't know if this can happen in the Australian model, but there may be
multiple visitor entrances which are true alternatives (i.e. not one
main plus one side entrance). I would hope the routing would pick the
most appropriate entrance, given an ultimate destination in the middle
somewhere and
On 27/05/2015 09:47, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 27.05.2015 um 09:38 schrieb Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
Absent any information, tagging the plot is better than nothing. A building is
better - and even better is the main entrance or an even finer scheme to
separate entrance and
On 27/05/2015 09:57, Daniel Koć wrote:
W dniu 27.05.2015 9:38, Jean-Marc Liotier napisał(a):
Also, the address must be unique - it must not be present on more than
one object, even if more than one POI exists at that address.
So there are exceptions to this rule: I know at least one example
2015-05-27 10:38 GMT+02:00 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com:
On 27 May 2015 at 09:48, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Am 27.05.2015 um 09:38 schrieb Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
Also, the address must be unique
why?
Otherwise they make bad routing
On 27 May 2015 at 10:48, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-05-27 10:38 GMT+02:00 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com:
On 27 May 2015 at 09:48, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Am 27.05.2015 um 09:38 schrieb Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
Am 27.05.2015 um 02:00 schrieb Ross i...@4x4falcon.com:
In Australia the address refers to the property ie the plot of ground that is
defined by the cadastral plan.
So those plots of ground may be 600 sq m or 1,000,000 hectares and may have
zero, one or many buildings.
generally
Martin et al.,
It might help to have some kind of paradigm here as I think our frames
of reference may be divergent. If we don't have consensus about the
question we will never agree about the answer except by coincidence,
and that would be the worst situation of all.
What are the use cases
On 27 May 2015 at 08:07, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Martin et al.,
It might help to have some kind of paradigm here as I think our frames of
reference may be divergent. If we don't have consensus about the question
we will never agree about the answer except by coincidence,
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:22 AM, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote:
In the US where there are mailboxes with the little flags on them it seems
correct to put the address on the node for that box. Common sense really.
Mike, you keep on insisting that addresses should always be put on
On 28 May 2015 at 00:39, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:22 AM, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com
wrote:
In the US where there are mailboxes with the little flags on them it
seems correct to put the address on the node for that box. Common sense
On 27 May 2015 at 08:48, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 27.05.2015 um 09:38 schrieb Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
Also, the address must be unique
why?
Otherwise high risk of computer crashing
Mike.
@millomweb
On 27 May 2015 at 01:00, Ross i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Your still missing the point.
Depending on the country, state, area the address does not necessarily
refer to the building.
In Australia the address refers to the property ie the plot of ground that
is defined by the cadastral plan.
Am 27.05.2015 um 09:07 schrieb Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
What are the use cases for an address? Is it as a routing target? A label
or annotation for a building? or a property in a looser sense? Is it for
the benefit of the postman? Or what?
it is a property of some other
On 27/05/2015 09:07, Colin Smale wrote:
What are the use cases for an address? Is it as a routing target? A
label or annotation for a building? or a property in a looser
sense? Is it for the benefit of the postman? Or what?
As Christian Quest explained on talk-fr just minutes ago, an address
Am 27.05.2015 um 09:38 schrieb Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
Absent any information, tagging the plot is better than nothing. A building
is better - and even better is the main entrance or an even finer scheme to
separate entrance and postbox.
if you add an address that belongs
Am 27.05.2015 um 09:38 schrieb Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
Also, the address must be unique
why?
Cheers
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
W dniu 27.05.2015 9:38, Jean-Marc Liotier napisał(a):
Also, the address must be unique - it must not be present on more than
one object, even if more than one POI exists at that address.
So there are exceptions to this rule: I know at least one example where
the same address is given for two
If a building is all one address, I see no reason not to tag the building
outline.
If there are multiple addresses, then nodes are a good way to go.
Both schemes are in use.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Your still missing the point.
Depending on the country, state, area the address does not necessarily
refer to the building.
In Australia the address refers to the property ie the plot of ground
that is defined by the cadastral plan.
So those plots of ground may be 600 sq m or 1,000,000
On 26/05/2015 6:11 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 25.05.2015 um 17:53 schrieb pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
CONGRATULATIONS ! You win the award for the best puzzle of the year! It appears
to be a loose numbering system for identifying entrances rather than properties.
that's
Mike, you are missing the point... A building and an address are two
different things. A building may have 0 to N addresses. An address may
or may not refer to a building. The business rules to link the two
concepts vary by country. An address is not usually a unique identifier
of a building -
On 5/26/15 6:56 PM, pmailkeey . wrote:
Building addresses shouldn't be on nodes. Named entrances can be - on
ent/exit nodes.
if building addresses shouldn't be on nodes, what are we to make of
the address interpolation feature?
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking -
On 26 May 2015 at 09:11, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 25.05.2015 um 17:53 schrieb pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
CONGRATULATIONS ! You win the award for the best puzzle of the year! It
appears to be a loose numbering system for identifying entrances
On 27 May 2015 at 00:06, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Mike, you are missing the point... A building and an address are two
different things. A building may have 0 to N addresses. An address may or
may not refer to a building. The business rules to link the two concepts
vary by
2015-05-23 1:56 GMT+02:00 pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
have a look at these housenumbers, they're 5 and 7 for this side of the
building (one big hotel), but the main address is from the main street
(front of the buikding) and is different.
On 25 May 2015 at 09:14, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-05-23 1:56 GMT+02:00 pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
have a look at these housenumbers, they're 5 and 7 for this side of the
building (one big hotel), but the main address is from the main street
(front of
Am 21.05.2015 um 23:53 schrieb pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
Tag the building with street address and add an ent/exit node to mark the
entrance.
have a look at these housenumbers, they're 5 and 7 for this side of the
building (one big hotel), but the main address is from the
On 22 May 2015 at 07:35, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 21.05.2015 um 23:53 schrieb pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
Tag the building with street address and add an ent/exit node to mark
the entrance.
have a look at these housenumbers, they're 5 and 7 for
On 21/05/15 20:16, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 02:08, Ross i...@4x4falcon.com
mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
On 21/05/15 09:51, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 2015-05-21 01:51, pmailkeey . wrote :
On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We know that addr:housenumber
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr=* can be tagged on
nodes
On 2015-05-20 19:26, Andreas Goss wrote :
That is the same number both on a node (once) and on the way/relation
*that this node belongs to* (once)?
Do you mean area when you say way? I think if a building has the
address then you should not have a node for just the address. If it's
a
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:13 AM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Info is routinely in two places, e.g. building and associatedStreet, to
cope with software or people that do not support one of the places.
that depends, some people use associatedStreet only to associate a
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:30 AM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
The wiki states that the address of an area can be tagged on one of its
nodes.
typically the entrance node.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
If I followed it correctly, also in the Netherlands all addresses are
mapped on nodes, which they lined up diagonally inside the building
contours, for buildings with more than 1 address.
Since they have all the data out in the open, they could import it, of
course, which means they now have a
On 21 May 2015 at 14:23, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 21.05.2015 um 01:51 schrieb pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
We know that addr:housenumber
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr=* can be tagged on nodes
On 21 May 2015 at 15:28, Ross i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
On 21/05/15 20:16, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 02:08, Ross i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
On 21/05/15 09:51, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We know that
On 21 May 2015 at 02:08, Ross i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
On 21/05/15 09:51, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We know that addr:housenumber
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr=* can be tagged on nodes
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:24 PM, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Another major OSM bug ! Buildings should have no more data than
name/number with regard to addressing as all the rest of the address should
be available elsewhere.
Easy to explain: editors ask the complete address
On 2015-05-21 11:33, Marc Gemis wrote :
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:13 AM, André Pirard
a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Info is routinely in two places, e.g. building and
associatedStreet, to cope with software or people that do not
support one of
In general, there is a many-to-many relationship between buildings and
addresses. Within one building, amenities/enterprises may each have
their own address. An address may also refer to multiple buildings.
//colin
On 2015-05-21 11:30, André Pirard wrote:
On 2015-05-20 19:26, Andreas
Info is routinely in two places, e.g. building and associatedStreet, to
cope with software or people that do not support one of the places.
But that should not happen. If you have the realtion there should not be
a addr:street tag on the building.
Which is why some time ago we also had a lot
On 2015-05-21 12:24, pmailkeey . wrote
:
On 21 May 2015 at 10:13, André Pirard
a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2015-05-21 01:51, pmailkeey . wrote :
On 21 May 2015 at 11:22, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
Be careful in which country you do this, never do this in Denmark e.g. [1]
How do you deal with buildings with multiple addresses ? Or does not not
exist in your part of the world (honest question) ?
regards
[1]
W dniu 21.05.2015 11:30, André Pirard napisał(a):
An amenity is not an object, it's an attribute of an object like a
building.
That would be more true for building=school probably (building with the
attribute of being suitable for school use) - things are very
complicated under the
Be careful in which country you do this, never do this in Denmark e.g. [1]
How do you deal with buildings with multiple addresses ? Or does not not
exist in your part of the world (honest question) ?
regards
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Denmark
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at
There are apartment buildings where each apartment has a different house
number, (and no, they are not unit or apartment numbers and yes 2 floors
with different apartments). [1]
Many discussions on the different OSM lists and fora have showed that in
different countries 1 building can have
On 21 May 2015 at 10:13, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2015-05-21 01:51, pmailkeey . wrote :
Info shouldn't be duplicated or triplicated either.
Please be clear and justify.
Info is routinely in two places, e.g. building and associatedStreet, to
cope with software or
On 21/05/15 20:16, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 02:08, Ross i...@4x4falcon.com
mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
On 21/05/15 09:51, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Am 21.05.2015 um 01:51 schrieb pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
We know that addr:housenumber=* can be tagged on nodes and that it's very
convenient.
But wrong.
what/where do you refer to? Is it wrong where you are? Typically inferring from
your own experience to every other
On 2015-05-21 12:16, pmailkeey . wrote
:
On 21 May 2015 at 02:08, Ross i...@4x4falcon.com
wrote:
On 21/05/15 09:51, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 18:40, Chris Fleming m...@chrisfleming.org wrote:
Fundamentally, there isn't a single answer to this problem. The answer we
have developed in Edinburgh is to place a node on the building where the
entrance is, this is largely because a single building will Costa n many
door
On 21/05/2015 7:30 PM, André Pirard wrote:
An amenity is not an object, it's an attribute of an object like a
building.
Objects? (note pun)
amenity=bbq
amenity=atm
amenity=fountain
amenity=bench
amenity=clock
amenity=photo_booth
amenity=post_box
etc...
Fundamentally, there isn't a single answer to this problem. The answer we
have developed in Edinburgh is to place a node on the building where the
entrance is, this is largely because a single building will Costa n many
door as well as shops etc. Shops are added as nodes set back I not the
Hi,
We know that addr:housenumber
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr=* can be tagged on nodes
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#How_to_map_addresses and
that it's very convenient.
A problem in tagging the number on a node *instead* of on an area is
that someone making a nice
That is the same number both on a node (once) and on the way/relation
*that this node belongs to* (once)?
Do you mean area when you say way? I think if a building has the address
then you should not have a node for just the address. If it's a amenity,
craft etc. then it's fine to put the
On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We know that addr:housenumber
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr=* can be tagged on nodes
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#How_to_map_addresses and
that it's very convenient.
But wrong.
A
On 21/05/15 09:51, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We know that addr:housenumber
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr=* can be tagged on
nodes
96 matches
Mail list logo
