Re: [Tagging] Water collection points (in french "Borne de puisage")

Hi Vincent, Please, what do you thing as a good way to tag it : - emergency=fire_hydrant and usage=* - amenity=hydrant and hydrant:type=* - amenity=water_point I would not go for anything like emergency=fire_hydrant or amenity=hydrant. This would make people confuse these bornes with real

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

I haven't seen anyone (recently) who supports your original proposal of keeping amenity=embassy and adding amenity=consulate. So I believe your first summary is inaccurate. Instead what I have seen is suggesting that amenity=diplomatic is possibly a better fit than office=diplomatic. So I would

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

OK, I take back what I said. And if Allan, Markus and Martin all think that's the way to go, I'm fine with that. On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 9:46 AM SelfishSeahorse wrote: > On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 09:41, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > > > > I haven't seen anyone (recently) who supports your

Re: [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables Proposal RFC

I incidentally ran across Moovit.com, who describe themselves as the wikipedia of transit and are using OSM as basemap: https://moovit.com and https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moovit#Product. Is it what you have in mind to achieve ?___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

sent from a phone > On 1. Nov 2018, at 07:20, Johnparis wrote: > > I haven't seen anyone (recently) who supports your original proposal of > keeping amenity=embassy and adding amenity=consulate. So I believe your first > summary is inaccurate. I do. For me this is most consistent with the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

On 01/11/18 17:20, Johnparis wrote: I haven't seen anyone (recently) who supports your original proposal of keeping amenity=embassy and adding amenity=consulate. So I believe your first summary is inaccurate. Instead what I have seen is suggesting that amenity=diplomatic is possibly a better

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 09:41, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > I haven't seen anyone (recently) who supports your original proposal of > > keeping amenity=embassy and adding amenity=consulate. So I believe your > > first summary is inaccurate. > > I do. For me this is most consistent with the

[Tagging] Water collection points (in french "Borne de puisage")

Hi, in France (i don't know for the others country and it's one of the reasons of this email) we have water collection points allowing professionals to obtain water. It's sometime similar to a fire hydrant (but green) and not used to fight fire. Few examples : -

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

W dniu 01.11.2018 o 09:12, Warin pisze: > A problem will be the lack of rendering for some time. Speaking of rendering - it might be useful to know that there is a map service called OpenDiplomaticMap, which is also a quality assurance tool: https://anders.hamburg/osm/diplomatic -- "Excuse

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tramtrack on highway

Hello everybody! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tramtrack_on_highway Definition: Cycling allowed on highway=*, but a tramway track (railway=tram) runs on it, though the tramway is mapped as a separate way. Although I've been a mapper for over a decade, this is my first

Re: [Tagging] Water collection points (in french "Borne de puisage")

1. Nov 2018 11:40 by vinc...@bergeot.org : > in France (i don't know for the others country and it's one of the reasons of > this email) we have water collection points allowing professionals to obtain > water. It's sometime similar to a fire hydrant (but green) and

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tramtrack on highway

1. Nov 2018 12:53 by jukka.nikulai...@helsinki.fi : > Although I've been a mapper for over a decade, this is my first feature > proposal. > Hopefully I have included everything needed for a complete RFC! > copy of my replies on the talk page (1)

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

How about amenity=embassy, amenity=consulate, plus amenity=representation to capture those facilities that are neither pudding nor frozen, er, sorry, neither embassies nor consulates?  Any heartburn there?  Then we use diplomatic=* as an additional tag (i.e., continue current practice) to specify

Re: [Tagging] Water collection points (in french "Borne de puisage")

sent from a phone > On 1. Nov 2018, at 15:47, Kevin Kenny wrote: > > (Dry standpipes would need both the inlets and outlets marked; I'll leave it > to someone else to work out the details, since I don't have any I plan to > map.) there’s already something documented:

Re: [Tagging] Water collection points (in french "Borne de puisage")

Le 01/11/2018 à 14:06, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : 1. Nov 2018 11:40 by vinc...@bergeot.org : in France (i don't know for the others country and it's one of the reasons of this email) we have water collection points allowing professionals to obtain water.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

Daniel, many thanks for this tip.  I had not seen this before!  It will be useful. Responses to the e-mail have been posted (with some consolidation to avoid unnecessary duplication) to the discussion page .  

Re: [Tagging] Water collection points (in french "Borne de puisage")

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:25 AM Moritz wrote: > I would use > > man_made=standpipe > colour=green > water_source=main > If you use that tag, make sure that you wikify it and discuss disambiguation, since 'standpipe' has many different meanings: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standpipe I don't

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

Yes, I agree that this sounds reasonable. On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:23 AM Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > If it’s 40 storeys of apartments above a 3 storey mall, use landuse=retail > for the whole mall area, and building=apartment for the residential towers. > The whole, larger mall building could

Re: [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables Proposal RFC

The timetable proposal would not affect existing OSM data. It would simply add new relations having existing features as members of those relations. If timetables are out of date for a certain route, a contributor could simply delete all of the timetable relations that are parents of that route.

Re: [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables Proposal RFC

Hi, Hint: you may get more qualified feedback if you use the talk-transit@ mailing list. This tagging@ list is a generalist mailing list intended to gather people with a passion to write mails. One thing we could investigate is some sort of indication whether a bus or train route tagged in

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:14 AM Allan Mustard wrote: > * shift to office=diplomatic and use the existing diplomatic=* additional > (secondary) tag to specify whether embassy, consulate, or other, then use > embassy, consulate and other as additional (tertiary) tags to specify > further the type

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 3:12 AM Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:14 AM Allan Mustard wrote: > >> * shift to office=diplomatic and use the existing diplomatic=* additional >> (secondary) tag to specify whether embassy, consulate, or other, then use >> embassy, consulate and

Re: [Tagging] How to tag named group of named water areas?

I don't see a problem with duplicating a tag in both the relation and sections of the object.  In my case I have been mapping the national highway network of Turkmenistan the last few months.  I have created relations so that all segments belong to one or more highways (P-1 from Ashgabat to

Re: [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables Proposal RFC

on bus routes so far, and I am not sure what people think of > the ferry route system that I have come up with. It would simply just be a > couple of new tags added to ferry route ways. > > Thanks, > Leif Rasmussen > -- next part ---

Re: [Tagging] How to tag named group of named water areas?

Allan, I'm not about to remove any tags from the highways in Turkmenistan. This isn't about an edit war. It's about trying to do things in the most efficient way possible. Using your highway as an example, let's say it has dozens of segments, each tagged with ref and other items as you indicated.

Re: [Tagging] How to tag named group of named water areas?

Putting aside the discussion about type for a moment, this topic relates to a discussion I'm having with a user about tags and multipolygons, specifically where the tags go, so I believe it fits into this discussion. I removed the tags from the ways for a section of the Trans Alaska Pipeline (TAP)

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

sent from a phone > On 1. Nov 2018, at 17:57, Allan Mustard wrote: > > How about amenity=embassy, amenity=consulate, plus amenity=representation to > capture those facilities that are neither pudding nor frozen, er, sorry, > neither embassies nor consulates? Any heartburn there? Then we

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

sent from a phone > On 1. Nov 2018, at 15:47, bkil wrote: > > I initially disliked the idea of only tagging retail landuse for mixed-use > urban centers, but it makes sense based on the need to tag one feature on one > area, and the limited options for rendering maps with overlapping

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

I would envision it including the state-level representations plus the various non-diplomatic "liaison offices" and "institutes" (e.g., American Institute in Taiwan) that are pseudo-embassies and in many cases lack both diplomatic status and immunities.  So diplomatic_representation would probably