How about amenity=embassy, amenity=consulate, plus amenity=representation to capture those facilities that are neither pudding nor frozen, er, sorry, neither embassies nor consulates? Any heartburn there? Then we use diplomatic=* as an additional tag (i.e., continue current practice) to specify different flavors, er, types of diplomatic/consular mission? Should I modify the proposed feature to that?
apm-wa On 11/1/2018 2:00 PM, Johnparis wrote: > OK, I take back what I said. And if Allan, Markus and Martin all think > that's the way to go, I'm fine with that. > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 9:46 AM SelfishSeahorse > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 09:41, Martin Koppenhoefer > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > I haven't seen anyone (recently) who supports your original > proposal of keeping amenity=embassy and adding amenity=consulate. > So I believe your first summary is inaccurate. > > > > I do. For me this is most consistent with the rest of the > system, requires the least modifications and I don’t see why it > shouldn’t work. > > +1 > > Regards > Markus > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
