On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 05:53:10PM +1000, Warin wrote:
> On 05/08/19 16:32, Peter Elderson wrote:
> > At the moment, 'unclassified' has so many different opinions that it
> > means nothing at all. Could we at least agree on the basics:
> >
> > A. "unclassified" means you don't know the class;
>
Hi,
Jmapb wrote
> I don't know if there's a distinct style of traditional bullring
> architecture, but if there is, then building=bullring makes sense for
> those.
Not much difference. For example, in Spain, tennis matches are played in
bullrings. They are suitable for other types of sports.
On 05/08/19 16:32, Peter Elderson wrote:
At the moment, 'unclassified' has so many different opinions that it
means nothing at all. Could we at least agree on the basics:
A. "unclassified" means you don't know the class;
No. The tag highway=road says that the class is unknown.
At the moment, 'unclassified' has so many different opinions that it means
nothing at all. Could we at least agree on the basics:
A. "unclassified" means you don't know the class;
or
B. "unclassified" is a class in itself.
If A the UK needs an alternative for roads officially classified as
I would recommend that the wiki reference the UK road classification scheme so
those who want to can delve into the classification scheme OSM uses.
Example:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/315783/road-classification-guidance.pdf
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 04:09, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> And if you read the wiki you can add another 3 opinions to that.
>
I just edited the wiki. Make that four.
--
Paul
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 06:26, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:30:48AM +0100, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> > I just reverted it. And added some clarification (some may disagree and
> > think I've murkified it)
> > based on why I think those words were removed back in February. Feel
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 1:32 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> All looks OK at first glance, Kev, except for one minor typo - you've got two
> Class 25's - I assume Historic should actually be 26?
Typo corrected, and further notes about class 26 added. (I can't
*quite* count all the instances of
Thanks, I've got it now.
The problem with the wikibase data item "labels": if you go to add the
description in another language for a recently created wiki page, the
top left of the page has a very large, gray text heading like "No
Label Defined" (but in Indonesian, or Spanish, etc), which
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 05:24, Kevin Kenny wrote:
>
> I had earnestly hoped to avoid the pain of coming up with a tagging
> proposal
I'm sorry to have been amongst those who caused you that pain.
> Suggestions are, of course, welcome, bearing in mind the above caveats.
>
Class 26 appears to
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:58 AM Paul Allen wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 05:24, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> Class 26 appears to encompass two things. Colonial-era entities, if purely
> historic, shouldn't concern us. OTOH, if they are a protected area by virtue
> of once being colonial-era entities
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 13:41, Kevin Kenny wrote:
[Class 26]
> I have no good examples to offer.
Me neither. But I can't say no such objects exist. It could happen that
some place
becomes a protected area because it was once occupied by colonialists, but
even
then I'd expect it to fall into
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 1:07 AM Florian Lohoff wrote:
> Correct - But from my experience its either a service or it has
> a name. At least in the part of Germany where i map.
>
> There are of course the 1% of exceptions where Bayer or BASF names roads
> on their facility property. But the typical
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 00:51 +0200, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> And nothing renders anyway. So why don't we just start using other
> public_transport values, like pole, waiting_area, and whatever we
> want. We just start using them, and give them the "platform" role in
> the relations. Rendering will
>Different places, different practices. In the rural areas near here, a
great many private service ways have names, so that the houses on them will
have street >addresses for emergency services to find. Often the name is
something like 'Smith Road' because it goes into the Smith family farm.
It's
R - unclassified
A - unclassified
B - track
C - residential
On 8/4/19 3:46 AM, Tomas Straupis wrote:
All right, let's make it more detailed and more extended.
R
R
RAAA
R A
R
R
R
R
Now A and C are ways leading into the inner territory of residential
building(s). But A has
On 06/08/19 09:19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 6. Aug 2019, at 00:20, dcapillae wrote:
Um, I don't think anyone in Spain would try to adapt a generic stadium as a
bullring.
what I meant was that there will probably be a dedicated area for the bulls and
their
and what if I do not agree with the English text. I saw the example
for addr:street in your movie.
The description now says you have to add addr:postal_code. This is not
true for countries whare postal code boundaries are mapped. I do agree
that this is needed in countries that use ZIP codes
Hi, Martin.
dieterdreist wrote
> the question is also how suitable a generic stadium would be for
> bullfighting.
Um, I don't think anyone in Spain would try to adapt a generic stadium as a
bullring. But not because it's difficult, but because bullfights are not as
popular as football, for
sent from a phone
> On 6. Aug 2019, at 00:20, dcapillae wrote:
>
> Um, I don't think anyone in Spain would try to adapt a generic stadium as a
> bullring.
what I meant was that there will probably be a dedicated area for the bulls and
their preparation (behind the curtain) and entry into
Requiring postal codes on addresses makes no sense even in countries that use
ZIP codes. When I walk down a street collecting house numbers I have no
indication of the ZIP code of each building. If you require ZIP codes then I am
forced into an import situation rather than a field survey.
21 matches
Mail list logo
