28 Jul 2020, 09:15 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 28. Jul 2020, at 07:13, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
>> wrote:
>>
>> As result, in initial stages something
>> used solely as a driveway to a single
>> house will be already named with
>> it's own street name.
>>
Am Di., 28. Juli 2020 um 11:35 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
>
> I treat these like this: the public part (if any) up to the property as
> residential (eventually as service) and the part on private grounds as
> service+driveway. Never use the driveway
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:52 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> Am Di., 28. Juli 2020 um 11:35 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
> tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
>
>>
>> I treat these like this: the public part (if any) up to the property as
>> residential (eventually as service) and the
So let me just repeat to see whether I understand you correctly. You
would like to see protection measures getting implemented in
OpenStreetMap editors (like JOSM, iD and Vespucci)?
Such protection would warn if any node or way is moved that has
accuracy < 1? And/or it would warn if the
Could be a groundy path go over in a bridge=boardwalk, change material, change
fixation to a pier, a pier could also be floating.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3Dboardwalk
From: Paul Allen
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 10:09 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
& for one that IMHO is quite correctly tagged as a pier over it's full
length:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18776776#map=17/-27.93856/153.43009
https://www.abc.net.au/news/image/10370420-3x2-700x467.jpg
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 16:10, Paul Allen wrote:
> There is no part of a pier on land. Not according to the wiki: "A pier is a
> raised
> walkway over water..." and "Lastly, connect the pier with other ways on land,
> otherwise it will result in a "island" that can't be used for routing." The
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 21:57, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
>
> This is not in line with current usage in OSM, e.g.
>
In which case the wiki page is unclear and misleading.
--
Paul
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Jul 28, 2020, 22:09 by pla16...@gmail.com:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 20:44, Matthew Woehlke <> mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com> >
> wrote:
>
>> Please see >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651244930>> . This is a pier
>> with a platform on land that extends into the water. Carto cuts off the
>>
On Tuesday 28 July 2020, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651244930. This is a
> pier with a platform on land that extends into the water. Carto cuts
> off the part that is on land.
>
> Is this a carto bug or should the part that is on land be tagged
>
I am beginning to thing you are correct that they intend to make the additional
information available via RapiD and then assume various mappers will use to add
data to OSM. I think he RapiD data can be accessed via the “MapWithAI: Download
Data” mechanism within JOSM. In my part of southern
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 20:44, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
> Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651244930. This is a pier
> with a platform on land that extends into the water. Carto cuts off the
> part that is on land.
>
There is no part of a pier on land. Not according to the wiki: "A
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 22:51, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> Jul 28, 2020, 22:09 by pla16...@gmail.com:
>
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 20:44, Matthew Woehlke
> wrote:
>
> Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651244930. This is a pier
> with a platform
On 28/07/2020 03.15, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Never use the driveway tag on public ways
Uh... IIUC, "public" driveways are just fine. A driveway is a minor
service road leading to a residential *or business* property. I've
tagged plenty of things that aren't really "roads" (entrances to
sent from a phone
> On 28. Jul 2020, at 19:26, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>
> Uh... IIUC, "public" driveways are just fine. A driveway is a minor service
> road leading to a residential *or business* property. I've tagged plenty of
> things that aren't really "roads" (entrances to parking lots,
sent from a phone
> On 28. Jul 2020, at 19:54, Kevin Broderick wrote:
>
> The homeowner now maintains the driveway (or sometimes more than one
> homeowner maintains a shared driveway), but the right-of-way remains open to
> the public, even beyond the regularly maintained driveway.
if you
Re: the discussion of driveways that are public ways, there *are* a fair
number of such things in New England, particularly Vermont. I suspect there
may be other places with similar situations, but I'm not sure; Vermont has
a particular set of laws around town right-of-ways that have preserved
I became aware that Orange County, California has released building outline and
address data to public domain [1] and started prep work for import to OSM. In
reading through the import guidelines [2] it seemed the process was:
1. Create a workflow (but don’t do any actual importing at this
Oops. Sent to wrong email list. Should have been imports. Please disregard.
—Tod
> On Jul 28, 2020, at 7:52 AM, Tod Fitch wrote:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
I thought the thing ESRI recently announced was basically additional layers
within RapiD, but I may be conflating two separate things.
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 15:53, Tod Fitch wrote:
> I became aware that Orange County, California has released building
> outline and address data to public domain
Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651244930. This is a pier
with a platform on land that extends into the water. Carto cuts off the
part that is on land.
Is this a carto bug or should the part that is on land be tagged
differently? (I wonder about the current behavior, because pier
sent from a phone
> On 28. Jul 2020, at 07:13, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> As result, in initial stages something
> used solely as a driveway to a single
> house will be already named with
> it's own street name.
I treat these like this: the public part (if any) up to the
22 matches
Mail list logo
