Am 21.05.2015 um 23:53 schrieb pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
Tag the building with street address and add an ent/exit node to mark the
entrance.
have a look at these housenumbers, they're 5 and 7 for this side of the
building (one big hotel), but the main address is from the
Hi,
On 05/22/2015 06:12 AM, Blake Girardot wrote:
OSM is about mapping what is important to people
AND on the ground. Important alone doesn't suffice.
and believe me, if the
only bridge for 50km is out that is important to me and others.
Yes, of course. If there is no bridge left at all
Am 22.05.2015 um 09:04 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Yes, of course. If there is no bridge left at all then we'd simply
delete - or refrain from mapping - the bridge (rather than create an
object saying there was a bridge but it's gone now).
Incidentally this means that
On 22/05/2015 8:54 PM, Richard Z. wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:52:06PM -0700, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Note that just because you can collect some data, does not make it a good
idea to put in OSM. Maintenance is harder than collection: and who's going
to go back three years after the HOT
On 23 May 2015 at 00:19, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sitting in the Seattle airport trying to figure out how to tag areas
that offer a power outlet and USB outlets for charging or powering
computers and other devices. There are many of them here at SEA and they
are
On 22 May 2015 at 07:35, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 21.05.2015 um 23:53 schrieb pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
Tag the building with street address and add an ent/exit node to mark
the entrance.
have a look at these housenumbers, they're 5 and 7 for
Duck tagging it's not. One could consider the horrors of tagging:
*amenity=charging_stationvoltage=5socket:usb=4*
From http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
But I think that's just as bad an idea as amenity=fuel;vehicle=no.
On 23/05/2015 9:56 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Duck tagging it's not. One could consider the horrors of tagging:
*amenity=charging_station
voltage=5
socket:usb=4*
From http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
But I think that's just as bad an idea as
I'm sitting in the Seattle airport trying to figure out how to tag areas
that offer a power outlet and USB outlets for charging or powering
computers and other devices. There are many of them here at SEA and they
are important places for travelers to know about. I tagged a few of them
with
Thanks for the great suggestions. I'm typing on an iPhone so will respond
fully after I reach my final destination.
amenity=charging_station with subtags for clarification seems to fill the
bill.
On Friday, May 22, 2015, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/05/2015 9:56 AM, Bryce Nesbitt
On 21/05/15 20:16, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 02:08, Ross i...@4x4falcon.com
mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
On 21/05/15 09:51, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 22 May 2015 at 16:05, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote:
Just found the proposal for shop=supplements.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/supplements
On the talk page already a lot of people suggested using
shop=nutrition_supplements instead.
But looking at
Am 22.05.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
Cascades, by their very nature, are not suitable for reflecting as the
water is agitated.
maybe this is a language issue, I would have thought they would reflect anyway
but you wouldn't see a clear picture (I agree
On 15 May 2015 at 12:25, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote:
'Pond' seems to fit the bill:
No, it does not.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 15 May 2015 at 16:40, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
Wiki suggests natural=water + water=reflecting_pool:
Cascades, by their very nature, are not suitable for reflecting as the
water is agitated. There may also be no horizontal surface to speak
of.
Maybe water=cascade could be the
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:52:06PM -0700, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Note that just because you can collect some data, does not make it a good
idea to put in OSM. Maintenance is harder than collection: and who's going
to go back three years after the HOT event and clean up?
same is even worse with
On 22/05/2015 5:32 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 22.05.2015 um 09:04 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Yes, of course. If there is no bridge left at all then we'd simply
delete - or refrain from mapping - the bridge (rather than create an
object saying there was a bridge but
On 22 May 2015 at 12:03, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
what are the other examples? We cannot propose tags if you don't say what you
want to tag ;-)
man-made, ornamental water features, which are not fountains
These might be cascades, rills, reflecting-pools, rain-chains,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:36:10PM +0200, Andreas Goss wrote:
As you linked to this on the HOT list a few things noticed...
What about the typhoon:, earthquake: or tsunami: tags? Replaced with
damage:event?
What about e.g. damage:building? This could still be used even if you have
Am 22.05.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
These might be cascades, rills, reflecting-pools, rain-chains, moats, etc.
We might, for example, have:
natural=water
water=cascde
etc. - but not:
water=fountain
as we already have
These replies are all very helpful, thank you very much.
On 5/22/2015 9:04 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Whether the bridge was broken by a hurricane or an earthquake or in a
war, will often not be easy to discern on the ground. Therefore I view a
tag that details the event which broke the bridge,
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:26:34AM -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote:
The water feature we are talking about here is an artificial waterfall,
usually pump-driven.
in that case it might be better to either use normal waterfall tagging
node with waterway=waterfall+ way waterway=weir,
possibly
On 22 May 2015 at 15:29, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
I am uncomfortable with cascade - in several languages it
means waterfall so there is considerable potential for
confusion.
I agree. A cascade is a waterfall in American English.
How, then would you describe:
On 22 May 2015 at 15:54, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
How, then would you describe:
Or these:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Site_of_Priory_Mill_-_geograph.org.uk_-_288573.jpg
The water feature we are talking about here is an artificial waterfall,
usually pump-driven.
On May 22, 2015 9:19:44 AM Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:00:30PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 22.05.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Andy Mabbett
I am uncomfortable with cascade - in several languages it
means waterfall so there is considerable potential for
confusion.
I agree. A cascade is a waterfall in American English.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:00:30PM +0200,
Just found the proposal for shop=supplements.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/supplements
On the talk page already a lot of people suggested using
shop=nutrition_supplements instead.
But looking at Wikipedia and google it seems like
shop=dietary_supplements would be
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:00:30PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 22.05.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
These might be cascades, rills, reflecting-pools, rain-chains, moats, etc.
We might, for example, have:
natural=water
How about fountain_cascade or waterfall_artificial?
It's a tricky proposition.
On Friday, May 22, 2015, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 22 May 2015 at 15:54, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
javascript:; wrote:
How, then would you describe:
Or these:
2015-05-22 12:14 GMT+02:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
Much quicker and cheaper to repair/replace sections that are damaged than
place a new road + bridges elsewhere.
yes, also because typically there has been a reason why a certain spot has
been chosen for the bridge (topography, river
30 matches
Mail list logo
