[Tagging] highway=crossing/crossing=traffic_signals

2015-07-14 Thread Dave F.
Hi The predefined options for a pedestrian road crossing that shares it's location with a set of traffic lights in P2, ID & JOSM is highway=crossing & crossing=traffic_signals: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1353800523 And yet it doesn't render in mapnik. Is this intentional or an oversi

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread moltonel
On 14 July 2015 19:57:30 GMT+01:00, jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me wrote: >Linguistically I would say proposed comes before planned. Planning >your wedding is not the same as proposing marriage! +1 >Personally I don't think we should routinely display proposed routes, >because they may never come

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread John Willis
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 15, 2015, at 3:05 AM, Andy Townsend wrote: > > Some of the "proposed" highways* are clearly just flights of fancy with no > timescale or money behind them. Yea, thats true - There are some freeways in California that have been proposed for 50 years! California h

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 14.07.2015 um 20:57 schrieb > : > > but planned routes are ones that have passed the usual planning discussions > and are awaiting construction, which can sometimes be many months or years, > but will happen, short of a political change of heart. typically these pla

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread jonathan
Linguistically I would say proposed comes before planned. Planning your wedding is not the same as proposing marriage! Personally I don't think we should routinely display proposed routes, because they may never come to reality, but planned routes are ones that have passed the usual plann

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread Andy Townsend
On 14/07/2015 18:23, Daniel Koć wrote: Hi, We're about to abandon rendering highway=proposed in the osm-carto (default OSM map style), but we think it's still good to show those which are closer to be really constructed: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1654 Is hig

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread Daniel Koć
W dniu 14.07.2015 19:38, Volker Schmidt napisał(a): As a map user I always like maps that look ahead and show planned roadways, not only those where you can already see the construction work going on. This has the added value when you plan a trip, that you would be alerted to possible problems (

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread Volker Schmidt
This is a question of language. The OSM life cycle discussion http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix lists "planned" as duplicate of "proposed". I would agree with that. As a map user I always like maps that look ahead and show planned roadways, not only those where you can already se

[Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread Daniel Koć
Hi, We're about to abandon rendering highway=proposed in the osm-carto (default OSM map style), but we think it's still good to show those which are closer to be really constructed: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1654 Is highway=planned a good choice to be rendere