Re: [Tagging] Mismatched tag status

P.S. I'm all for merging the inuse and defacto statuses, but that's a separate discussion. On Tue, Jun 11, 2019, 03:34 Yuri Astrakhan wrote: > Paul, as a programmer, I'm sure you know the difference between a keyword > and the text shown to the user. The issue is not in translation, the issue >

Re: [Tagging] Mismatched tag status

Paul, as a programmer, I'm sure you know the difference between a keyword and the text shown to the user. The issue is not in translation, the issue is that we have two __keywords__: "defacto" or "inuse". It does not matter how English, German, and other wiki pages translate those keywords. Yo

Re: [Tagging] Mismatched tag status

On 11/06/19 09:41, Paul Allen wrote: On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 00:21, Yuri Astrakhan > wrote: There is currently 267 key & tags on OSM wiki with mismatching STATUS field, as seen in http://tinyurl.com/y62j5m5e - e.g. amenity=fast_food has status=defacto i

Re: [Tagging] Mismatched tag status

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 00:21, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: > There is currently 267 key & tags on OSM wiki with mismatching STATUS > field, as seen in http://tinyurl.com/y62j5m5e - e.g. amenity=fast_food > has status=defacto in 10 languages, except German where it is marked as > status=in use. Clearly t

[Tagging] Mismatched tag status

There is currently 267 key & tags on OSM wiki with mismatching STATUS field, as seen in http://tinyurl.com/y62j5m5e - e.g. amenity=fast_food has status=defacto in 10 languages, except German where it is marked as status=in use. Clearly this is not intentional, and should be the same in all language

Re: [Tagging] New description of waterway=pressurised

Le 09.06.19 à 01:12, Richard a écrit : > The water level drops a few inches and > suddenly the "pipe" is no longer water filled intermittent=yes/no some industrial installations (I am thinking of an waterway between retention basins at the Grande-Dixence Dam, part of which is natural) have been

Re: [Tagging] refugee camp

The refugee camps I'm familiar with in Thailand are not social facilities except in an incidental way. They are essentially internment camps surrounded by fences with guarded gates where undocumented aliens are kept. They are landuse=residential because they're isolated areas in the countryside and

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Line attachments

Hi all Following the pretty long discussion occurred in March, the proposal has been updated again with two main improvements : * Moved line_attachment=shackle to pulley since shackle was not used in a proper sense. * Improved examples, especially for complex configurations for which parenthesis a

Re: [Tagging] refugee camp

If you look at it from a temporary residence for the group of people perspective, then I guess tags like place=village/town/neighbourhood could be better choices? 在 2019年6月10日週一 20:18，Joseph Eisenberg 寫道： > I understand why refugee camps have been mapped with > amenity=social_facility - it's the

Re: [Tagging] refugee camp

I understand why refugee camps have been mapped with amenity=social_facility - it's the closest existing tag, since tourism=camp_site is clearly wrong and landuse=residential isn't quite right. However, I don't think that large refugee camps are a perfect fit for amenity=social_facility. Most of

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tag:tourism=camp_pitch

> The OSMwiki says tourism=caravan_site is not for sites that accept tents > at all. I think you are mistaken. The wiki page says "They may also have some space for tents. If a site is primarily for tents, it should be tagged as tourism=camp_site". This has always been a part of the page, since 20

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tag:tourism=camp_pitch

On 10/06/19 13:48, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: How do you handle sites that accept both caravans and tents on different pitches? I believe you may be thinking about how to choose between tourism=camp_site vs tourism=caravan_site for a dual-use campground or campsite. I would use camp_sit

[Tagging] refugee camp

> > On 6/6/2019 5:27 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > >>* I'd suggest something like social_facility=temporary_housing. > *>>>* To me, social_facility doesn't quite cut it for "refugees". Refugees > *>* strike me as people fleeing from war / massive natural disaster - > *>* social_facility comes