On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
To me, the straightforward solution would be:
addr:housenumber = 6345
addr:street = W. Euclid Avenue (maybe without the abbreviation)
To add to that, I would posit that the name including the direction and
suffix is
I noticed the majority of the trackage of the San Francisco Muni lines are
tagged as layer=1, while the streets along which they run have no layer tag
(an implied layer=0).
If the Muni lines are layer=1, it is my understanding that the Muni lines
should be physically above the street.
Since this
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Clay Smalley claysmal...@gmail.comwrote:
I noticed the majority of the trackage of the San Francisco Muni lines are
tagged as layer=1, while the streets along which they run have no layer tag
(an implied layer=0).
If the Muni lines are layer=1, it is my
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:40 AM, A.Pirard.Papou
a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
A level is an altitude. A layer is a drawing opacity. Although OSM does
not tag for the renderer, it uses the tag *layer=**. It defines *layer*as the
relative position (is that altitude?). In fact, the only
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
The layer tag is only a hint to renderers. If you remove the tag the road
way may render over the rail way and hide it.
Yes, that's been my understanding. It's also been my understanding that we
have a separate renderer for
I do some mapping in SF too. The Muni Metro lines weirded me out when I
first saw it, and I looked up the proper practice on the wiki as well as
looking for a few examples in Europe, and it seems that the best practice
is to just add railway tags and the proper relations to the street whenever
it
Sounds about right, but add layer=* tags where appropriate. Clouds go above
the land, so we have to make sure they render above everything (except
certain bridges and buildings). Might as well add layer=5 to all of them
for good measure.
On Apr 1, 2014 12:16 PM, Matthijs Melissen
Coming from the US where any form of roundabout is rare, I would consider
any circular intersection a roundabout. Some have signals, some don't have
signals. I know that some people in the US distinguish between the two,
where a 'roundabout' has no signals and a 'traffic circle' does have
signals.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020, 10:31 AM Hartmut Holzgraefe <
hartmut.holzgra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2020-10-12 15:51, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote:
> > DWG and the foundation, are not in the verification and editing
> > business, so who is ?, under penalty of banning.
>
>
> context?
>
He got
If you
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 12:51 PM Colin Smale wrote:
> On 2020-08-18 20:55, Clay Smalley wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:26 AM Colin Smale
> wrote:
>
>> There are two use cases here: one is "what is the address of this
>> building (or whateve
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:26 AM Colin Smale wrote:
> There are two use cases here: one is "what is the address of this building
> (or whatever)" and the other is the reverse situation: "where can I find
> number XXX". As long as we have tagging that is potentially ambiguous we
> won't be able
For those who aren't following, the DWG recently decided on a two-day ban
for the person who posted this, for the exact behavior they're exhibiting
right now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3850
jdd 3, please take a break. You have better things to do.
I look forward to when you
Everyone knows who you're talking about at this point, and nobody cares.
Use the remaining day or so of your temporary ban to work on some hobbies
outside of OpenStreetMap.
And be careful about who you say isn't local. I'm moving to Northern
Indiana next week and I'll certainly get the chance to
Chiming in as another settler. I really wish we had more Natives active on
OSM contributing their cultural knowledge. What could we be doing different
in the future to welcome and engage them in our community?
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 12:28 PM Kevin Kenny wrote:
> Both the US and Canada consider
What exactly is your point here? If nobody is responding to your
complaints, perhaps they aren't worth responding to. Repeating the same
complaints to the same group of people won't change that.
Are you worried that incorrectly-mapped stop positions endanger people's
safety?
We've pointed out
> and yes i can fix the system that till has the signs.
> but even then the guy driving does not see it that way.
> the stops are fake because that is not the way the it works here thus a
> fake map.
>
>
> Tuesday, August 11, 2020 12:53 PM -05:00 from Clay Smalley <
> claysmal
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 9:06 AM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> in the chicago area we have 3 railway company’s operating the system, and
> one had signs left up from the old days
>
> which in watching the train come into the stations platform did not stop
> at
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 4:27 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> one of the points that i talked about, that no one has answered yet is
> what about someone not local
>
> who just puts 400 + unverified stops on platforms and there all wrong.
>
Again, is there a
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 3:08 PM Peter Elderson wrote:
> I still don't understand why you tag "US" while it's obviously a bunch of
> roads in the US. or Interstate when the road clearly crosses state lines. I
> think that"s more redundant than tagging "we classify this route as a
> regional
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020, 5:00 PM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> The wiki page text says that a railway=funicular is "A funicular, also
> known as an inclined plane or cliff railway, is a cable railway in which a
> cable attached to a pair of tram-like vehicles on rails moves them up and
> down a steep
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020, 6:30 PM Guillaume Chauvat wrote:
> Sorry for spamming.
>
> I also think it's fine if the Montmarte funicular is tagged as a
> funicular. But I'm asking because of things that are clearly elevators,
> like this one:
>
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:12 AM Dave F via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> On 22/11/2020 11:24, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
>
> I sincerely hope "I'm in favor of fixing" translates as "I'm planning to
> fix", though I fear I may be disappointed.
>
> More broadly, we need to nip this
Voting has started for the solar tracker tagging scheme.
Please cast your vote here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Solar_Panel_Trackers
-Clay
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Cross-posted from the forum [1]:
This proposal consists of a tag on railway crossing nodes to denote that
> train-horn (whistle) operation at said crossing is different from national
> law/standard (US quiet zones/Canadian whistle bans, wayside horn
> operations, or places on a rail network where
Following discussion on the forum [1], I’ve developed a tagging proposal to
indicate the existence and type of solar tracker on solar panels and
thermal collectors.
Since I started last month at Global Energy Monitor, I’ve single-handedly
added thousands of instances of solar:tracking=* and have
Voting has started on the proposal to introduce the key crossing:whistle=*.
Please vote on the wiki page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Level_crossing_train_horn_usage
(posted here by request of UrbanUnPlanner in
26 matches
Mail list logo
