Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] destination:street

]. Would that then be destination:street=1300 So.;2100 So. and destination:ref=201 and destination:West Valley? The advantage of having a separate tag partly vanishes when you still need the semicolon separator? Martijn van Exel [1] http://taginfo.osm.org/keys/destination%3Astreet#map <h

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] destination:street

In the US the prefix would typically be in the network tag, like network=US:US ref=89 for US highway 89, etc. We have seen some of this in Canada as well. (CA:ON for Ontario highways etc.) Martijn van Exel > On Jan 20, 2017, at 12:57 AM, Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> wrote: > >

[Tagging] destination:street

want to go. Happy mapping, Martijn van Exel ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] cardinal directions

Martijn van Exel > On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:35 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org > <mailto:m...@rtijn.org>> wrote: > I am trying to be consistent with the outcome of the discussion t

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] cardinal directions

of info to ways makes it impossible to validate / maintain. This also does not have to preclude having separate e/w or n/s relations + a super relation — I think that is actually good practice for big relations to keep them manageable. Martijn van Exel > On Jan 13, 2017, at 11:40 PM, P

[Tagging] cardinal directions

Hi all, Some of you may remember the discussion we had on tagging cardinal directions in the US, which led to the wiki page[1] describing the current practice. Basically the convention we arrived on is to tag relation members with role=north/east/south/west to indicate cardinal direction. This

[Tagging] 'ongoing' U-turn restriction

van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] fixme -- by a specific date

that also goes beyond 'seasonality'. What do you think? [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:seasonal Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Bill Ricker <bill.n1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Martijn van Exel

Re: [Tagging] fixme -- by a specific date

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44013342 for a tagging example. Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > Hi, > > When mapping seasonal closures here in Utah[1] I realized I am still > m

[Tagging] fixme -- by a specific date

of proposed or under-construction features for which you may know a projected start / finish date. Or semi-permanent features that you know will disappear at some point. I know HOT has interest in this kind of 'lifecycle' tagging as well. Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ [1] A lot of fairly major

Re: [Tagging] Proposal for standardization of sidewalk schema (+ import)

Frederik, On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/01/2016 11:35 PM, Meg Drouhard wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Our team is proposing a standardization of sidewalk tagging conventions > > in OSM to simplify pedestrian network annotations and better

[Tagging] time-conditioned turn restriction

Looking at the pages for turn restrictions and conditional restrictions, I gather that you would map a left turn restriction that is only valid between 6am and 9am and again between 4pm and 7pm as: type=restriction;restriction=no_left_turn; no_left_turn:conditional=no @ (Mo-Fr

[Tagging] Tagging National Forests

not tag National Forests as landuse=forest? Martijn van Exel skype: mvexel ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Follow up on destination= and destination:ref=

deprecating exit_to. As much as I would love to, that would require more discussion around what we will do with the existing exit_to tags, support in editors, etc. I would like to start talking about these things, but not before I am comfortable that we want this as a community. -- Martijn van Exel http

[Tagging] Usage of exit_to

I explained it in a diary entry - feel free to comment there or here. http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/22419 -- Martijn van Exel http://oegeo.wordpress.com/ http://openstreetmap.us/ ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Automated edit of company name change

to action. Martijn -- martijn van exel http://oegeo.wordpress.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] round and round about:how to map this?

://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- martijn van exel http://oegeo.wordpress.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Two lane expressways

the fuck are you talking about? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- martijn van exel http://oegeo.wordpress.com ___ Tagging mailing list

[Tagging] Two lane expressways

flag is potential missing bridge or tunnel tags, my current query relies on two intersections between motorway and other way, and thus wouldn't catch instances where the motorway is just one line feature. -- martijn van exel http://oegeo.wordpress.com

Re: [Tagging] Openstreetview or similar and JOSM integration

van exel http://oegeo.wordpress.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Two lane expressways

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote: On 5/11/2012 4:23 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: Hi, Two-lane expressways. I came across one of these when running an analysis on OSM data in Vermont, USA. I didn't even know they existed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki

[Tagging] day_on / day_off question

be on the road at any time. [..] (Source: http://www.slcclassic.com/utilities/ud_citycreek_reservations.htm#anchor4) -- martijn van exel http://oegeo.wordpress.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http

Re: [Tagging] day_on / day_off question

Hi, Thanks for providing your insights, Jørgen. On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jørgen Elgaard Larsen j...@elgaard.net wrote: Martijn van Exel wrote: See my current try at this here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/33973144 First of all, you should not use motor_vehicle=private

Re: [Tagging] sidewalks and tagging for the renderer

on interstate highways, there are locations where alternate routes are not available'[1]. [1] http://www.dot.state.wy.us/files/content/sites/wydot/files/shared/Planning/Wyoming%20Bicycle%20%20Pedestrian%20Transportation%20Plan.pdf, page 5 -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore 1109 1st ave #2

Re: [Tagging] sidewalks and tagging for the renderer

on an incline, the sidewalk follows the road but has steps in some places. You would want to capture the steps for accessibility reasons, and you can't by just adding a sidewalk tag to the main way feature. -- Martijn van Exel ___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] sidewalks and tagging for the renderer

On 4/10/2012 2:15 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote: Martijn van Exel wrote: Consider this situation: a road on an incline, the sidewalk follows the road but has steps in some places. You would want to capture the steps for accessibility reasons, and you can't by just adding a sidewalk tag to the main way

Re: [Tagging] sidewalks and tagging for the renderer

On 4/10/2012 4:38 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote: Martijn van Exel wrote: A sidewalk is not a lane and it should not be tagged as such. Doing so would be utterly confusing. Does the lanes proposal (which I think is horribly overwrought to begin with) not exclude sidewalks? Not explicitly. And while

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - TMC - New tagging scheme for TMC

On 4/9/2012 9:33 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: On 3/29/2012 7:01 AM, Heinrich Knauf wrote: Hello, infoware GmbH, Bonn, Germany, and Geofabrik GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany, have developed an improved tagging scheme for TMC data which we would like to propopose to the OSM community. Currently

Re: [Tagging] man_made

___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore 1109 1st ave #2 salt lake city, ut 84103 801-550-5815 http://oegeo.wordpress.com ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Why are railway=crossing and level_crossing separate tags?

with gates)? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore 1109 1st ave #2 salt lake city, ut 84103 801-550-5815 http://oegeo.wordpress.com

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Mapping guidelines

. -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore 1109 1st ave #2 salt lake city, ut 84103 801-550-5815 http://oegeo.wordpress.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Turn Lanes

a good example. I am inclined to tag this as centerlane=yes - or is there an established standard - or is it included in your proposal and did I manage to overlook it? -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore 1109 1st ave #2 salt lake city, ut 84103 801-550-5815 http://oegeo.wordpress.com

Re: [Tagging] Rd -- Road

no reference to this fixbot on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_fixup or http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER. -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore 1109 1st ave #2 salt lake city, ut 84103 801-550-5815 http://oegeo.wordpress.com ___ Tagging

[Tagging] highway=stop as relation

the intersection that have a stop sign. This would require you to split the way at the intersection, as with turn restrictions. A similar proposal was made on the discussion page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dstop#Why_not_use_Relation:restriction.3F Best, -- martijn van exel

Re: [Tagging] Rd -- Road

On 12/29/2011 10:35 AM, Richard Welty wrote: On 12/29/11 11:30 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: Hi, I just came across an area with some abbreviated road names. JOSM issued a warning about this, suggesting I expand these 'Something Rd' names to their full equivalents. Is this indeed common practice

[Tagging] Rd -- Road

Hi, I just came across an area with some abbreviated road names. JOSM issued a warning about this, suggesting I expand these 'Something Rd' names to their full equivalents. Is this indeed common practice? If so, this could be scripted, couldn't it? -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore

[Tagging] Variable max speed corridors

Variable max speed corridors are nothing new for Europe, but they apparently are a novelty for the US. Is there an established tagging convention for this? http://www.katu.com/news/local/Variable-speed-limit-signs-are-coming-to-Portland-136326623.html -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Variable max speed corridors

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 22:12 -0600, Martijn van Exel wrote: Variable max speed corridors are nothing new for Europe, but they apparently are a novelty for the US. Is there an established tagging convention

Re: [Tagging] Wheelchair ramp

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/11/30 Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org: Hi all, Is there a specific tag for a wheelchair ramp that is not part of a steps feature? I generally use a dedicated way and tag it highway=footway IMHO they do

[Tagging] Wheelchair ramp

Hi all, Is there a specific tag for a wheelchair ramp that is not part of a steps feature? I see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Steps_features#Ramps but that's a tag to be used in conjunction with steps and this is a separate feature. -- martijn van exel geospatial

Re: [Tagging] Wheelchair ramp

, November 30, 2011, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: Hi all, Is there a specific tag for a wheelchair ramp that is not part of a steps feature? I see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Steps_features#Ramps but that's a tag to be used in conjunction with steps

Re: [Tagging] Tagging a club's meeting location

mark every class on a university campus, you don't mark your monthly LUG meeting's location. - Serge ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore

Re: [Tagging] Tagging a club's meeting location

- although keys must be unique so if there are more users you'd have to add them all to one tag with a separator). On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/8/2011 3:08 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: You could of course use the website tag (formerly url

Re: [Tagging] Tagging a club's meeting location

http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore 1109 1st ave #2 salt lake city, ut 84103 801-550-5815 http://oegeo.wordpress.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Light rail station

reservation to include. On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote: On 8/18/2011 11:18 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: John, Trams and light rail are two disparate things, in planning and construction, service, and embedding into the existing infrastructure

Re: [Tagging] Light rail station

tool could figure out that the stops are light rail stops anyway. Martijn On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: Richard, Why 'should' they be a tram stop? Is that a convention I don't know about? I can't derive it from the descriptions in the wiki

Re: [Tagging] Light rail station

and use detail tags where necessary to clarify. Martijn On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote: On 8/18/2011 1:49 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: Where I come from[1], light rail is characterized by longer stop intervals and right of way and dedicated

Re: [Tagging] fire alarms

restricted to switches. -- martijn van exel schaaltreinen.nl ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] fire alarms

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 9:10 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 4 June 2011 17:02, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: I don't know of any, but I would go with emergency=phone, and specify maybe in another tag phone=fire_alarm or some such thing. The description of emergency

[Tagging] steps as access to water, and waterfront

Hi, How would you tag steps that provide access to water? See here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rhodes/5793021284 -- martijn van exel schaaltreinen.nl ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] steps as access to water, and waterfront

links photo to OSM object. I wonder if there's an easier way to do that (for example through a JOSM plugin)..? This may be off-topic here, I'll cross-post to talk. -- martijn van exel schaaltreinen.nl ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

[Tagging] types of surveillance cameras

and static cameras make sense or are there more major categories? * Would this be a relevant attribute to tag? I think it is. [1] streetview link http://goo.gl/maps/xGcz [2] streetview link http://goo.gl/maps/qkWo -- Martijn van Exel http://about.me/mvexel

Re: [Tagging] types of surveillance cameras

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Georg Feddern o...@bavarianmallet.dewrote: Hi, Martijn van Exel schrieb: I am noticing a two major types. There's what I call the dome cameras [1] that live in a dome-shaped enclosure and can probably tilt and swivel to cover a larger area, and there's

Re: [Tagging] types of surveillance cameras

(again numeric for -180 ... 180 or just 'up', 'straight', 'down' or something. On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:14 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/4/11 Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org: Maybe it could also be interesting to describe where the camera is mounted (pole