Le 6 octobre 2017 18:34:30 GMT+02:00, marc marc a
écrit :
>Le 04. 10. 17 à 17:44, Yves a écrit :
>> Now if it's bad, you can trust the contributors not to use it.
>> Also, you can take time to explain your argument against in the
>> discussion page, it's a wiki ;-)
>
>if an individualist contr
Le 04. 10. 17 à 17:44, Yves a écrit :
> Now if it's bad, you can trust the contributors not to use it.
> Also, you can take time to explain your argument against in the
> discussion page, it's a wiki ;-)
if an individualist contributor makes both mass changes on the wiki to
mark tags that bother
Hi Yves,
Am 04.10.2017 um 17:44 schrieb Yves:
> Whatever this tag is good or bad, it's not a good idea to delete the page
> from the wiki.
> If I find it in the data, this page will inform me on its meaning.
> Now if it's bad, you can trust the contributors not to use it.
> Also, you can take
Whatever this tag is good or bad, it's not a good idea to delete the page from
the wiki.
If I find it in the data, this page will inform me on its meaning.
Now if it's bad, you can trust the contributors not to use it.
Also, you can take time to explain your argument against in the discussion
On 03.10.2017 11:34, Thilo Haug wrote:
Please describe which 'problems' you fear to appear if it's not deleted.
As you ask so directly - the core problem is your attitude towards the
community.
On 10 January 2017 you propose "motorcycle_friendly", but don't discuss it in
the community.
On 1
2017-10-03 16:02 GMT+02:00 Thilo Haug OSM :
> You're talking about things like this ?
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dinsect_hotel
>
>
I don't see an issue with this, it has 105 instances tagged and
documentation in several languages. I'm not very interested in the topic,
but
2017-10-03 12:32 GMT+02:00 marc marc :
> and more, if you delete the banners that warn the problem, it is clearly
> an intention to mislead people and / or manipulate the result of the
> invalid vote of the proposal, which in my opinion alone justifies a
> radical clarification to make the differe
You're talking about things like this ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dinsect_hotel
Have those all been discussed ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Seamarks/Seamark_Object_Usage
When is it "low usage" ?
And how should usage appear (in a structured way),
if it's not documente
Le 03. 10. 17 à 11:52, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
>
>
> 2017-10-03 11:34 GMT+02:00 Thilo Haug mailto:th...@gmx.de>>:
>
> Please describe which 'problems' you fear to appear if it's not deleted.
>
> If everybody creates feature pages for his personal, low usage features,
> the wiki loose
2017-10-03 11:34 GMT+02:00 Thilo Haug :
> Please describe which 'problems' you fear to appear if it's not deleted.
>
If everybody creates feature pages for his personal, low usage features,
the wiki looses it's function of documenting the generally used and
established features, as they are not
Please describe which 'problems' you fear to appear if it's not deleted.
In case anyone would have improvement suggestions they are certainly
appreciated.
Am Montag, 2. Oktober 2017 23:20:41 CEST schrieb marc marc
:
Hello,
Le 02. 10. 17 à 13:21, Michael Reichert a écrit :
What are your opin
On 02-Oct-17 10:21 PM, Michael Reichert wrote:
Hi,
while I was looking up some tags for camp sites, I just stumbled across
the proposal of motorcycle_friendly=* and the tags motorcycle:*=*. The
proposal was discussed on this mailing list in March 2017.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/t
Hello,
Le 02. 10. 17 à 13:21, Michael Reichert a écrit :
> What are your opinions?
I totally adhere to the many problems you point out.
Regards,
Marc
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2017-10-02 13:21 GMT+02:00 Michael Reichert :
>
>
> What are your opinions?
I agree that features which have been rejected in proposal voting should
not get a feature definition page, at least not if they are disputed and
not used in significant numbers (there will still be the proposal page t
Hi,
while I was looking up some tags for camp sites, I just stumbled across
the proposal of motorcycle_friendly=* and the tags motorcycle:*=*. The
proposal was discussed on this mailing list in March 2017.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-March/031403.html
I hereby propose t
15 matches
Mail list logo
