On 9/27/10 1:08 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
because not everyone to whom you give money to get something can be
considered a retailer. Wikipedia states:"In commerce, a "retailer"
buys goods or products in large quantities from manufacturers or
importers, either directly or through a wholesale
2010/9/27 Nathan Edgars II :
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 6:05 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> 2010/9/27 David Paleino :
>>> I'd say +1 to retail=food and food=cafe|restaurant|... though.
>>
>> -1, I wouldn't tag restaurants, cafes and others as retail.
> Why not? They're places where you buy thi
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 05:19:58PM +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2010/9/27 Elena of Valhalla :
> > this would give a space for regional variants such as
> > food+drink=biergarten|gelateria|whatever_else, preventing the creation
> > of additional amenities whose usage makes little sense out of
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:19:58 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2010/9/27 Elena of Valhalla
> :
> > of course, we still have the problem with the tag name, since
> > "food+drink" doesn't look quite right
>
> if is probably not "good English", but I think it's quite appealing:
> it is easily unde
2010/9/27 Elena of Valhalla :
> There was indeed some discussion on the italian mailing list, where
> they felt the need to distinguish between italian style "gelateria"
> and other kinds of ice cream sellers
and not only...
> this would give a space for regional variants such as
> food+drink=b
Why changing an old and widely used "amenity=restaurant"+"cuisine" ?
+1
Although I agree that the current amenity=restaurant, fast_food...etc.
is a bit awkward, it is nearly unthinkable that it should be changed because
of the number of people who are already using and rendering the data.
On 9/27/10, Pieren wrote:
> Why changing an old and widely used "amenity=restaurant"+"cuisine" ? [...]
> This can be accepted only if it's to clear ambiguities or add
> a real value but that's not the case here.
mostly because the current system does not scale, with food+drinks
places being an ar
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:23 PM, David Paleino wrote:
Why changing an old and widely used "amenity=restaurant"+"cuisine" ? As it
was mentionned many times in the past, discussing new keys is easy when it's
about new features (e.g. craft). But changing old and well established tags
is generating
On 9/27/10, David Paleino wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:14:19 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
[...]
>> Almost every one of those approves is by someone living in Italy,
>> which suggests discussion on the Italian mailing list or other
>> discussion among a small group in an echo chamber.
There w
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:15:50 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 6:05 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> > In German I would use "Gastronomie" as main tag for those, but I'm not
> > sure if "gastronomy" would be the exact translation in English for
> > this. My dictionary suggests "cat
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 6:05 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2010/9/27 David Paleino :
>> I'd say +1 to retail=food and food=cafe|restaurant|... though.
>
> -1, I wouldn't tag restaurants, cafes and others as retail.
Why not? They're places where you buy things.
> In German I would use "Gastrono
2010/9/27 David Paleino :
> I'd say +1 to retail=food and food=cafe|restaurant|... though.
-1, I wouldn't tag restaurants, cafes and others as retail. I am not
opposing food=cafe / restaurant, etc., this would also be compatible
with the current amenity-tag, but I don't see a big benefit (we
alre
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:11:08 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:49 AM, David Paleino
> wrote:
> > On a related note: me and some other people on #osm-it were thinking about
> > re-organizing the "food" tagging (take "food" as an example in the
> > following). Something lik
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:49 AM, David Paleino wrote:
> How would you call then shop=ice_cream, sneaked in the wiki without any
> discussion or voting or anything else?
Another bad tag.
> On a related note: me and some other people on #osm-it were thinking about
> re-organizing the "food" taggin
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:14:19 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:48 AM, David Paleino
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:26:27 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> >
> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features%2FIce_cream&action=historysubmit&diff=53
15 matches
Mail list logo
