Re: [Tagging] subway_entrance

Hi Marc, yes, wheelchair=yes is part of the official spec for railway=subway_entrance. I was just wondering whether other features could be indicated as well, like presence of steps (at that entrance), etc. Bjoern On 7 July 2016 at 14:36, Marc Gemis wrote: > what about

Re: [Tagging] subway_entrance

what about wheelmap.org [1] ? it shows whether an entrance is accessible for wheelchair users. Not everything is visible on osm.org, but sometimes you can use alternate OSM-based maps. m [1] http://wheelmap.org/en/map#/popup/1274040743?lat=51.50811726643938=-0.1252618432044983=london=19 On

Re: [Tagging] subway_entrance

On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 17:34 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > sent from a phone > > > > > Il giorno 06 lug 2016, alle ore 16:33, Philip Barnes > t.me.uk> ha scritto: > > > > A subway entrance normally leads into a ticket hall where there are > > machines to buy tickets,

Re: [Tagging] subway_entrance

sent from a phone > Il giorno 06 lug 2016, alle ore 16:33, Philip Barnes > ha scritto: > > A subway entrance normally leads into a ticket hall where there are > machines to buy tickets, the barriers and then the lift and/or stairs > are beyond those. what is normal

Re: [Tagging] subway_entrance

Certainly wheelchair=yes/no in conjunction with railway=subway_entrance is used a lot in central London: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/hap Bjoern On 6 July 2016 at 15:33, Philip Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 16:23 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > > > > sent

Re: [Tagging] subway_entrance

> However, how would you look for subway_entrances that are accessible? If > the lift is mapped separately, it won't be mapped as a subway_entrance (as > there should only be one subway_entrance per physical entrance)? > > > > I don't follow you here. If the lift leads to the subway, why couldn't

Re: [Tagging] subway_entrance

On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 16:23 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > Il giorno 06 lug 2016, alle ore 16:05, Bjoern Hassler l.com> ha scritto: > > > > > > However, how would you look for subway_entrances that are > > accessible? If the lift is mapped

Re: [Tagging] subway_entrance

sent from a phone > Il giorno 06 lug 2016, alle ore 16:05, Bjoern Hassler > ha scritto: > > > However, how would you look for subway_entrances that are accessible? If the > lift is mapped separately, it won't be mapped as a subway_entrance (as there > should only be

Re: [Tagging] subway_entrance

Hi Martin, thanks for the response. Sure, the features can be mapped separately. However, how would you look for subway_entrances that are accessible? If the lift is mapped separately, it won't be mapped as a subway_entrance (as there should only be one subway_entrance per physical entrance)?

Re: [Tagging] subway_entrance

sent from a phone > Il giorno 06 lug 2016, alle ore 14:23, Bjoern Hassler > ha scritto: > > In my view, it would make sense the label subway_entrances e.g. as follows: > > wheelchair=yes > steps=yes > conveying=yes > > indicating that the entrance ("conceptually"

[Tagging] subway_entrance

Hi all, I'm wondering about tagging for subway_entrances. I've seen "steps=yes" on some. In my view, it would make sense the label subway_entrances e.g. as follows: wheelchair=yes steps=yes conveying=yes indicating that the entrance ("conceptually" offers these features). Do you agree? Also