2012/4/15 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com
Somebody should start an OpenServicesDatabase-project, that would
host information about hotels, restaurants, cafes, museums and parks
with detailed description of amenities provided along with user
reviews.
/Markus
This would be
On 15/05/12 22:25, Colin Smale wrote:
It would be nice if these rond-points would be explicitly tagged (e.g.
junction=rond_point???) so mkgmap can still easily be taught to
recognise it and treat it as a roundabout even if it doesn't comply with
the OSM semantics for one. Otherwise your satnav
First of all many thanks for your detailed and constructive feedback.
2012/5/15 Andrew Chadwick (lists) a.t.chadwick+li...@gmail.com:
Still open, so please provide feedback:
* Decision if traffic_calming=chicane or traffic_calming=island should
be used in two of the examples
Chicanes look
2012/5/16 Andrew Chadwick (lists) a.t.chadwick+li...@gmail.com:
According to Wikipedia at least, the ones without priority for
circulating traffic are called traffic circles in the US, and they use
the BE roundabout as we do in GB:
In the U.S., traffic engineers use the term roundabout for
On 15/05/12 14:46, Anthony wrote:
I'd prefer highway=turning_loop. I think it'll be more noticeable.
But either solution is fine. Purists can easily go through and
convert them, if they care.
+1
Sorting turning loops from turning circles can be time-consuming. So
it's nice to have a way
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/15/2012 10:30 AM, Anthony wrote:
Okay, so, for OSM terminology, a roundabout means 1) traffic goes in
one direction; 2) entering traffic must yield; and 3) entering traffic
need not stop (no stop signs).
Nope.
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
It would be nice if these rond-points would be explicitly tagged (e.g.
junction=rond_point???) so mkgmap can still easily be taught to recognise it
and treat it as a roundabout even if it doesn't comply with the OSM
On 16/05/12 12:03, Martin Vonwald wrote:
Thanks for your work.
8. Editor support for circles seems too prominent where it is, and
nobody's really bothered about the neatening tools at first. I suggest
demoting this to a later section, and maybe retitling it as Drawing
neater circles.
2012/5/16 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
In the JOSM section a link to the JOSM-wiki describtions of the tools [1][2]
is
useful.
[1] https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/AlignInCircle
[2] https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/CreateCircle
Links added - thanks.
On 5/16/2012 8:51 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Unless you want to invent a new tag
for the New Jersey circles that give right-of-way to some approaches.
I wouldn't mind. There's something fundamentally different between a
Does anyone have an actual use case where it's so important to know
whether entering traffic yields that the user expects a completely
different tag when one or more approaches has right-of-way?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Am 16.05.2012 um 19:44 schrieb Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
Does anyone have an actual use case where it's so important to know whether
entering traffic yields that the user expects a completely different tag when
one or more approaches has right-of-way?
Penalties for routing?
On 5/16/2012 1:52 PM, Martin Vonwald (Imagic) wrote:
Am 16.05.2012 um 19:44 schrieb Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com:
Does anyone have an actual use case where it's so important to know whether
entering traffic yields that the user expects a completely different tag when
one or more
On 16/05/2012 19:01, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 5/16/2012 1:52 PM, Martin Vonwald (Imagic) wrote:
Am 16.05.2012 um 19:44 schrieb Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com:
Does anyone have an actual use case where it's so important to know
whether entering traffic yields that the user expects a
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/05/2012 19:01, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 5/16/2012 1:52 PM, Martin Vonwald (Imagic) wrote:
Am 16.05.2012 um 19:44 schrieb Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com:
Does anyone have an actual use case where it's so
On 16/05/12 21:34, Toby Murray wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/05/2012 19:01, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 5/16/2012 1:52 PM, Martin Vonwald (Imagic) wrote:
Am 16.05.2012 um 19:44 schrieb Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com:
Does anyone
On 5/16/2012 1:06 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
I guess that depends on what you're trying to do... If you are trying
to tag the largest possible vessel that can navigate a waterway (under
normal conditions at least) you could probably come up with a
reasonable set of tags. Inland waterways are
On May 16, 2012 12:35 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
There is highway=stop and highway=give_way but their use is kind of
awkward. The wiki says to put it on a node before the intersection
which makes some sense but then anyone who actually wants to use it
has to do some
On 5/16/2012 6:48 PM, Dale Puch wrote:
I found this at http://www.ndc.iwr.usace.army.mil/data/dictionary/ddnwn.htm
Data is here http://www.ndc.iwr.usace.army.mil//db/waternet/data/ but
not in shp format so someone would need to do some format translation.
There are lots of other sets of data and
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have an actual use case where it's so important to know whether
entering traffic yields that the user expects a completely different tag
when one or more approaches has right-of-way?
I think the issue is
On 5/16/2012 7:41 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have an actual use case where it's so important to know whether
entering traffic yields that the user expects a completely different tag
when one or more approaches has
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/16/2012 7:41 PM, Anthony wrote:
Does anyone have an example of a traffic circle
where entering traffic does not yield, but it makes sense for a satnav
to say make a left at the roundabout?
I'd expect to be told
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have an actual use case where it's so important to know whether
entering traffic yields that the user expects a completely different tag
when one or more approaches has right-of-way?
Also, I'd prefer for my
On 5/16/2012 8:13 PM, Anthony wrote:
Also, I'd prefer for my satnav to save the word roundabout for
actual roundabouts. If it starts talking to me about roundabouts when
I'm just merging onto a road which is part of an interchange which is
kind of circular in shape, I'm just going to get
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/16/2012 8:13 PM, Anthony wrote:
Also, I'd prefer for my satnav to save the word roundabout for
actual roundabouts. If it starts talking to me about roundabouts when
I'm just merging onto a road which is part of
On 5/16/2012 8:34 PM, Anthony wrote:
Anyway, while looking for an example of a roundabout, I came across
this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/83428962/history
Why did you remove the roundabout tag?
Because it's not a complete circle...
___
On May 16, 2012 4:47 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd expect to be told take the nth exit from the roundabout/circle. How
is the satnav to know if an angle of 135 degrees is straight or left?
Same here, especially given situations like Ladd's Circle in Portland,
which is a
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/16/2012 8:34 PM, Anthony wrote:
Anyway, while looking for an example of a roundabout, I came across
this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/83428962/history
Why did you remove the roundabout tag?
Because
On 5/16/2012 10:42 PM, Dale Puch wrote:
You might check with the OpenSeaMap guys
Surely at one of them is paying attention to tagging@?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
29 matches
Mail list logo
