Why not record the URL of the store in website=*? That way people can
visit the store's website and see for themselves what they sell.
The benefit of this is that if the shop alters their range of goods
you don't need to alter the tags. The store will update their
website. So, all you need is
2013/6/7 Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com
Why not record the URL of the store in website=*? That way people can
visit the store's website and see for themselves what they sell.
of course you do this IF they have a website (traditional smaller ones
usually won't have a website I guess,
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 17:42:32 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/6/7 Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com
Why not record the URL of the store in website=*? That way people can
visit the store's website and see for themselves what they sell.
of course you do this IF they have a website
2013/6/6 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com
Last but not least my question still remains. Why was it just set to
abandoned without any prior discussion on this list ?
Interestingly this seems to be a case of fiddling by admin, as the user
setting this to abandoned is a wiki admin according to
2013/6/7 Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com
While I am on this flight of fancy, how about Update POI by email?
some time ago there was a proposal to update POI by twitter IIRR, maybe
that service is still active?
cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Koppenhoefer (Dipl-Ing. Arch.)
Via del Santuario
2013/6/7 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
2013/6/6 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com
Last but not least my question still remains. Why was it just set to
abandoned without any prior discussion on this list ?
Interestingly this seems to be a case of fiddling by admin, as the user
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2013/6/6 Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com
We have gotten several notes reported from craigslist users saying this
lake is missing from the map but I think it turns out that craigslist is
not rendering landuse=reservoir so unless lakes have
I want to call a few facts in mind:
- We have an old attribute landuse = reservoir. This is very much in use.
- We have a proposal Water detail. This was approved in voting by a large
majority.
This proposal includes:
waterway=riverbank (replaced by natural=water + water=river)
On 06.06.2013 23:55, fly wrote:
We should use both landuse and water. The first for the whole area and
the later for the water area.
[...]
Better use boolean (e.g. intermittent=yes/no).
Maybe editors should warn or silently change these tags.
Last but not least my question still remains.
If you look at my entire message, I did point out that vertical clearance was
an attribute of the ways, not the bridge. How should the vertical clearance
from the bridge to the water be tagged, and how do you tag what height of water
was the reference point? If the water level is high, there
Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de writes:
Because the Water details proposal¹ included the deprecation. It was
even mentioned on this list that the proposal included deprecation -
although learning which tags exactly were proposed for deprecation
required clicking the wiki link iirc. Still,
Am 07.06.2013 16:20, schrieb René Kirchhoff:
I want to call a few facts in mind:
- We have an old attribute landuse = reservoir. This is very much in use.
- We have a proposal Water detail. This was approved in voting by a
large majority.
16:3 is a poor result for voting activity
This
Am 07.06.2013 15:11, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2013/6/7 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com
2013/6/6 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com
mailto:lowfligh...@googlemail.com
Last but not least my question still remains. Why was it just set
I remember you that the voting of this proposal is under way and will end on
2013-06-15:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Animal_breeding
Please express your opinion, so we can finally end the procedure and create
a definitive wiki page.
Thank you
Alberto
Am 07.06.2013 19:24, schrieb Alberto:
I remember you that the voting of this proposal is under way and will
end on 2013-06-15:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Animal_breeding
Please express your opinion, so we can finally end the procedure and
create a definitive wiki
Note: I'm using on-line translation dictionaries. Please correct or
clarify any non-English word misuse. I have tried to learn other languages,
but find I am not adept at language skills. I know dictionaries can be
misleading or wrong from experience. Years ago I ate in a Munich restaurant
where
* Murry McEntire murry.mcent...@gmail.com [130607 20:15]:
[..]
A summary as I understand it:
We currently have English labels and definitions used for tags for bakery
and confectionery that have language translation mismatches, especially
based on common usage of the words.
English
This sounds like a reasonable compromise. Incidentally, I am an American and
would not classify pastries and confections as the same thing, although one
shop will sometimes sell both. I would tend to think of a bread shop as a
shop that sells bread, and perhaps other baked goods, but does not
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:42 AM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.comwrote:
I am also a programmer, and agree that it would make sense to have a
movable tag with a value of yes or no, in addition to the finer-grained
bridge=type tag. If we were dealing with a database with all bridge types
Wolfgang Zenker wolfgang@... writes:
* Murry McEntire murry.mcentire@... [130607 20:15]:
[..]
A summary as I understand it:
We currently have English labels and definitions used for
tags for bakery
and confectionery that have language translation mismatches, especially
based on
A look at the English language business directory for Cairo Egypt shows two
categories related to the discussion: Bakery Pastry Shops and Candy
and Confectionery. They do not do sub categories, but allow the businesses
to select keywords. Listings are few, so should not be considered a good
21 matches
Mail list logo
