On 07.07.2013 18:33, fly wrote:
Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for
broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice
task for a bot.
It was originally broad_leafed in the Wiki, but it was considered a spelling
error and therefore it was
There are species that are both broad-leaved and evergreen. One example would
be magnolia trees. They drop old leaves in the spring, as new leaves grow. At
no time is the tree leafless.
John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:47 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com
Am 07.07.2013 19:32, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
On 07.07.2013 18:59, John Sturdy wrote:
On further thought, I'd go for type=deciduous, rather than
broad-lea[fv]ed. Not quite the same thing (I think larches are
deciduous but not broad-leaved) but I think it's the normal technical
term (the others
Hi,
I'm new to this proposed tagging process etc, but I wanted to know what
happened with this childcare tag proposal?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare2.0
Thanks,
Alyssa.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Am 09.07.2013 17:35, schrieb alyssa wright:
Hey Alyssa
I'm new to this proposed tagging process etc, but I wanted to know what
happened with this childcare tag proposal?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare2.0
I really do not see any major changes to the rejected
Sorry, I don't really follow. So some questions inline:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:35 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 09.07.2013 17:35, schrieb alyssa wright:
Hey Alyssa
I'm new to this proposed tagging process etc, but I wanted to know what
happened with this childcare tag
There are no approved tags in OSM. You can use any tag you want, so if the
childcare tags suit you, use them.
I agree that discussion and documentation are very helpful, but a few negative
votes (even thousands of negative votes) cannot stop the tag being used. There
are no tag police, no
Yes, people keep saying that. But as a new editor, my inclination is to use
approved tags and not ones that are in the proposal stage. This is
consistent in what I've seen anecdotally with new members. This tag has yet
to go up for a vote. How can it go up for a vote? But then why even have a
Hi,
On 09.07.2013 19:13, alyssa wright wrote:
Yes, people keep saying that. But as a new editor, my inclination is to
use approved tags and not ones that are in the proposal stage.
Most new editors (in the human being sense) tend to use the tags
offered by their editors (in the software
Thanks. I'm beginning to get a better sense of how things operate.
Appreciate the patience. That said -- how does one move a proposed tag to a
vote? Like can I call one right now?
Best,
Alyssa.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 09.07.2013
It would probably be good to re-open discussion (and add your voice to
it, particularly as you have an interest in using such a tag); after
that, I think this one could be ready to vote on.
__John
On 7/9/13, alyssa wright alyssapwri...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. I'm beginning to get a better
It's actually not a feature proposal, but a clarification and cleanup proposal.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Drock_cleanup
--
Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:13 PM, alyssa wright alyssapwri...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, people keep saying that. But as a new editor, my inclination is to use
approved tags and not ones that are in the proposal stage. This is
consistent in what I've seen anecdotally with new members. This tag has yet
Thanks Serge for the clarification. Super helpful.
So as John suggested, I'll add my feedback to the existing thread and ask for a
vote as I too enjoy voting.
Best,
Alyssa.
On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:13 PM, alyssa
14 matches
Mail list logo
