office=government ?
i was just looking at something similar with immigration offices, oft
frequented by travelers. embassies, yes. in-country immigration offices,
no.
--
Alex
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
To move this forward I've put this in
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Alex Rollin alex.rol...@gmail.com wrote:
office=government ?
i was just looking at something similar with immigration offices, oft
frequented by travelers. embassies, yes. in-country immigration offices,
no.
That's broader, and works for some ranger
I meant any like in any tag you want, not all :)
For mountains, users might find reasonable to group peaks and ridges, but the
rental holiday may feel it belongs too, and not necessarily the baker.
Anyway the question is, does this belong to osm ? I already found some polygons
in valleys with a
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:19 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 06.08.2013 16:27, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
Fortunately, the boundaries of the area are not important in themselves.
Nobody renders valley or mountain group borders. But we *do* use such
boundaries for name placement.
I
Il giorno 07/ago/2013, alle ore 08:17, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com ha
scritto:
office=government ?
i was just looking at something similar with immigration offices, oft
frequented by travelers. embassies, yes. in-country immigration offices,
no.
That's broader, and works for
Il giorno 07/ago/2013, alle ore 10:00, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
This solution can also apply to bodies of water that are not whole lakes or
rivers. We currently (I think) do not tag the extent (even if fuzzy) of seas,
bays, inlets, coves, fjords, and the like.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno 07/ago/2013, alle ore 10:00, Eugene Alvin Villar
sea...@gmail.com ha scritto:
We currently (I think) do not tag the ***extent*** (even if fuzzy) of
seas, bays, inlets, coves, fjords, and the like.
The best way I can think of for drawing oceans, is to put a tag on all
natural=coastline ways that are bordering it. Something like
ocean:name:en=Atlantic ocean.
Janko
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
2013/8/7 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com
The best way I can think of for drawing oceans, is to put a tag on all
natural=coastline ways that are bordering it. Something like
ocean:name:en=Atlantic ocean.
If you look closely onto this you'll see that there are not only the oceans
but a whole
2013/8/7 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
If you look closely onto this you'll see that there are not only the
oceans but a whole hierarchy of names seas and oceans and parts of them,
so there is not only one name per coastline but a lot of them. Dependent on
the scale of your
After reading the discussion and incorporating what I could, I am moving
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:amenity%3Dranger_station
to the next step. Please comment per voting procedures, here or on the
talk page.
___
Tagging
Note there is overlap between amentiy=ranger_station
and tourism=information. A ranger station generally provides information
in addition to other services. In the USA ranger stations have well
established symbols, distinct from those used for tourist information only
sites.
On 06.08.2013 15:51, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/45.2466/6.0866
which has been tagged with a multipoligon relation.
Unfortunately, the relation has some problems:
- not rendered anywhere?
This is a super-relation, with other relations as members. This is not
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
After reading the discussion and incorporating what I could, I am moving
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:amenity%3Dranger_station
to the next step. Please comment per voting procedures, here
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at wrote:
It should rather be a type=collection relation.
I really hate type=collection. One of the worst idea in OSM. All
relations are collections.
Pieren
___
Tagging mailing list
I don't see how those tags are mutually exclusive. As for a dam being a
waterway, makes about as much sense as highway=traffic_signals to me.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:13 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
The waterway=dam http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dam definition
Am Thu, 08 Aug 2013 02:13:38 +0200
schrieb André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi,
The waterway=dam http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dam definition
is all well but it doesn't give a damn about what runs on top ;-)
Can I have
waterway=dam
highway=*
?
You could map the dam as area
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:13 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
The waterway=dam http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dam definition is
all well but it doesn't give a damn about what runs on top ;-)
...
And, once again, I'm baffled by a dam being a waterway, like a crossing
being a
18 matches
Mail list logo
