[Tagging] turn:lanes vs. turnlanes:turn

2013-10-17 Thread Ronnie Soak
Hi, I'm in the process of adding more detail to the major junctions in terms of lane counts, turn lanes, width, etc. There seem to be two tagging schemes in parallel: - the turn:lanes[1] scheme which adds lane descriptions as tags to way segments. - the turnlanes:turn[2] scheme which adds lane

Re: [Tagging] turn:lanes vs. turnlanes:turn

2013-10-17 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 09:28:09AM +0200, Ronnie Soak wrote: Hi, I'm in the process of adding more detail to the major junctions in terms of lane counts, turn lanes, width, etc. There seem to be two tagging schemes in parallel: - the turn:lanes[1] scheme which adds lane descriptions as

Re: [Tagging] turn:lanes vs. turnlanes:turn

2013-10-17 Thread Martin Vonwald
Hi! 2013/10/17 Ronnie Soak chaoschaos0...@googlemail.com So my questions: - Are these schemes both still actively used? Are there data consumers who use these already? I don't know about turnlanes, but all the :lanes-keys I watch are continuously growing in usage numbers. - What are the

[Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-17 Thread Pieren
Could someone explain the difference between tourism=guest_house and tourism=bed_and_breakfast ? Both are suggested here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house but only guest_house is really documented in the wiki. In taginfo, we find 527 tourism=bed_and_breakfast and 32382

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-17 Thread Martin Vonwald
Hi! 2013/10/17 Pieren pier...@gmail.com So, I'm looking if we could reuse the two existing tags or if I should create a sub-tag like tourism=guest_house + guest_house=bed_and_breakfast or guest_house=whatever_in_an_independent_building +1 for the sub-tags. br, Martin

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-17 Thread sabas88
2013/10/17 Pieren pier...@gmail.com Could someone explain the difference between tourism=guest_house and tourism=bed_and_breakfast ? Both are suggested here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house but only guest_house is really documented in the wiki. In taginfo, we

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-17 Thread Dan S
2013/10/17 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com: Hi! 2013/10/17 Pieren pier...@gmail.com So, I'm looking if we could reuse the two existing tags or if I should create a sub-tag like tourism=guest_house + guest_house=bed_and_breakfast or guest_house=whatever_in_an_independent_building +1

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-17 Thread Janko Mihelić
I have come across tourism=apartments, there are 125 of them right now. Are those actually badly tagged tourism=guest_house? I think there's no real difference between them and guest houses. I like the sub-tags. ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-17 Thread Craig Wallace
On 2013-10-17 09:52, Pieren wrote: Could someone explain the difference between tourism=guest_house and tourism=bed_and_breakfast ? Both are suggested here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house but only guest_house is really documented in the wiki. In taginfo, we find

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-17 Thread Dudley Ibbett
From a tourists perspective it is quite important to know whether it is self catering accommodation or not. It is also important to know whether it is a single building unit (i.e. house,cottage,chalet) as opposed to a number of units in a building (i.e. apartments). I would be inclined to use