Me too. restaurant, fast_food, pub, restaurant, ice_cream, beer garden, cafe
and bar for example should be shop= not amenity .. for my thinking.
+1
shop=storage to me means a shop that sells bags, boxes .. stuff to store
things in ... not the space to store stuff in.
In America,
Storage and long term parking are subtly different - and LTP is definitely a
part of parking.
AFAIK, long term storage has the assumption that a: you are a traveller in some
respect, and the amenity is usually near transportation facilities
B: you will come back sometime, once possibly
Maybe we have to be able to specify per type whether it is waste or
recycling and whether you have to pay for it or not.
e.g. for the containerparks (that's how we call them here in Flanders)
amenity=xxx
xxx:glass_bottles=recycling_no_fee
xxx:sand=waste_plus_fee
...
the values are not good,
So how does one differentiate between a common use lot that is private
And a *shop* that offers that? Isn't there some need for the shop=* in some
regard.
Javbw
On Feb 22, 2015, at 3:30 AM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
If the use of the vehicle storage is limited to
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 22, 2015, at 3:30 AM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
If the use of the vehicle storage is limited to certain people, such as
residents of a particular neighborhood, use access tags as well. It then
becomes the responsibility of the renderer to
On 22/02/2015 9:55 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
I see no need to replace the recycling scheme, sorry.
Ok ... do you see a need to have a key waste_collection= at all? Or
should OSM continue to have amenity= values made for each kind of waste
collection point? Thoughts?
There is no way to
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 23:55 +0100, Marc Gemis wrote:
Over here, there is a clear difference between recycling containers
and waste bins.
Don't think it would make mapping easier, as I said I already think of
recycling vs. waste, so looking for recycling under waste is not
natural for
Tagging the relation containing the parts of the route is not the issue.
I am referring to the ways that represent the actual track a canoe would
take to traverse a lake. It is a type of path but it is on water, sort of
like a ferry route. For example, the most direct route across a lake might
Ok, so probably it's due to the translation step that I have to make that
waste is more negative to me than recycling. Sorry.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 1:47 AM, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net
wrote:
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 23:55 +0100, Marc Gemis wrote:
Over here, there is a clear
On 22/02/2015 2:21 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
Tagging the relation containing the parts of the route is not the issue.
I am referring to the ways that represent the actual track a canoe
would take to traverse a lake. It is a type of path but it is on
water, sort of like a ferry route. For
This seems like a good place for highway=path + portage=yes
Because these are definitely still paths (and sometimes coincident with a
land based path).
whitewater=portage_way seems overly specific, as does canoe=portage.
___
Tagging mailing list
On 22/02/2015 1:37 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up. Canoe routes and their connectors is a
topic that needs work.
In the present case and to answer your question, I would prefer portage=*
This would leave open multiple possibilities for values, yes/no,
canoe. kayak,
On 22/02/2015 4:09 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
re; http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/waste_collection
I don't see how this proposal is any better than the current
amenity=recycling tag with all its subtags.
Better.. hmm ..
It is one level up .. so more prominent
It is combined
Over here, there is a clear difference between recycling containers and
waste bins. Although recently they have been introducing waste bins that
are a combination of classical waste bins and recycling containers for
plastic bottles and tin cans. Both holes are clearly marked for their
purpose:
On 22/02/2015 10:27 AM, John Willis wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 22, 2015, at 3:30 AM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com
mailto:j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
If the use of the vehicle storage is limited to certain people, such
as residents of a particular neighborhood, use access
Thanks for bringing this up. Canoe routes and their connectors is a topic
that needs work.
In the present case and to answer your question, I would prefer portage=*
This would leave open multiple possibilities for values, yes/no, canoe.
kayak, etc., that might more fully describe the portage.The
If the use of the vehicle storage is limited to certain people, such as
residents of a particular neighborhood, use access tags as well. It then
becomes the responsibility of the renderer to check these tags.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only
re; http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/waste_collection
I don't see how this proposal is any better than the current
amenity=recycling tag with all its subtags.
I understand that some waste containers are not covered by the recycling
tags, but why would you drop the complete
So let us see:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 05:57:47AM +0100, Andreas Labres wrote:
A Materialseilbahn is a special type of aerialway (Seilbahn) and should have
its own value. See the picture linked in the wiki. This is not a cable car,
this
is not a gondola, it is a Materialseilbahn (if you
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 06:05:40PM +0100, Pieren wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
How is routing software supposed to know that some aerialway=goods are
actually taking passengers?
like roads tagged with access=no or private. Or
Sure, but we need to show that you can't store a boat in a car storage.
On Sat Feb 21 2015 at 7:32:25 PM John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com
wrote:
If the use of the vehicle storage is limited to certain people, such as
residents of a particular neighborhood, use access tags as well. It
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please have a look at this feature proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/parking%3Dcar_storage
.
One question I have is, would this be more for something like this storage
lot I can't
Hi, I'd like to add some tags for canoe portages (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portage) in wilderness areas. These would be
trails tagged highway=path plus some tag to designate that they're used for
portaging between lakes. I have found three different tags that are
currently used to tag
23 matches
Mail list logo
