Re: [Tagging] shop=fuel

The main difference between the shop and highway example is that you are stil listing a fixed number of properties of the road, unlike the number of products. There are a unlimited number of products sold via store. Furthermore the brand, the price and packaging of those products might be

Re: [Tagging] shop=fuel

2017-01-19 13:30 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis : > But what with the additional parameters: How detailed did I specify > the products (do I want a TV or model XYZ from brand ABC) ? I'm a > willing to buy a different brand of something to save x kms of travel > or euros. Do I need

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] cardinal directions

Martijn van Exel > On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:35 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Martijn van Exel > wrote: > I am trying to be consistent with the outcome of the discussion that we had > on talk-us a couple

[Tagging] Exit list signs?

What's the best way to map signs like this on freeways/motorways that list exits serving a particular area, including destinations, distances to the exits, and exit numbers? Perhaps one destination_sign relation for each exit listed, or is there a better way, if

Re: [Tagging] shop=fuel

On 20-Jan-17 12:28 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2017-01-19 13:30 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis >: But what with the additional parameters: How detailed did I specify the products (do I want a TV or model XYZ from brand ABC) ? I'm a

Re: [Tagging] destination:street

Hey Martijn, It looks correct to me - using the destination:street allows users to know if the ramp is branching onto the specified street name vs. heading toward a street name - examples are located here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Exit_Info#Road_name_Example Mappers have been using in

[Tagging] destination:street

Hi all, The Telenav mapping team noticed quite a few destination:street tags on (mostly) motorway_link off-ramps in Canada. This is an undocumented sub-tag of the destination tag so I am curious how it is being used and if there is some sort of consensus that is documented somewhere else than

Re: [Tagging] shop=fuel

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > At what points along the way will you be able to buy; > milk > bread > vegetables > fruit > meat In Western Europe you go to a supermarket :-) And most likely you will find a fuel station on the premises as well. But I

Re: [Tagging] shop=fuel

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Which are the osm features that tell you in a reliable way if ice cream is > available? There are some (e.g. amenity=ice_cream), but if you rely only on > them you'll miss a lot of other places that might be

Re: [Tagging] shop=fuel

On 20-Jan-17 03:47 PM, Marc Gemis wrote: But your shopping list is pretty vague. As you already indicate by your sentence about fuel brand, No, not a brand but a rating of knocking. Some vehicles require a 'high' performance fuel to avoid engine pinging or knocking. Running such engines on

Re: [Tagging] shop=fuel

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20-Jan-17 03:47 PM, Marc Gemis wrote: >> >> >> But your shopping list is pretty vague. As you already indicate by >> your sentence about fuel brand, > > > No, not a brand but a rating of knocking. Some people will demand a

Re: [Tagging] zero waste

While this all makes sense, I wonder why something like fair_trade doesn't follows that logic too. So, for example, certification:oxfam=yes for shops selling fair trade products certified by Oxfam. Which leads me to think that we need a double subtag (oh dear):

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] cardinal directions

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > Martijn van Exel > > On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:35 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > >> I am trying to be consistent with the