Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 19:21:07 -0800, Minh Nguyen wrote: > Vào lúc 17:39 2022-11-18, Matija Nalis đã viết: >> 1 on twitter and 2 on OSM Diary of proposer. Do you spot the problem here? >> Because I do. > > No one has seriously proposed to make a Twitter announcement part of the > standard

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 15:38, Minh Nguyen wrote: > > There are some ways to draw attention to a wiki talk page comment in > general. For example, if I add {{ping|Fizzie41}} to my comment, you'll > get a notification, including by e-mail if you've set that up. If your > comment concerns the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

Vào lúc 22:07 2022-11-19, Graeme Fitzpatrick đã viết: On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 15:38, Minh Nguyen > wrote: There are some ways to draw attention to a wiki talk page comment in general. For example, if I add {{ping|Fizzie41}} to my comment, you'll

Re: [Tagging] care services

On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 12:36, Matija Nalis < mnalis-openstreetmapl...@voyager.hr> wrote: > > > My question is for a unique company providing different services for > > assistance at home, but the goal is not healthcare. Probably > > office=home_aide could be good, I am questionning english native

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power utility office

On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 08:52:45 +0200, Dimitar wrote: > > What evidence do you have that is the case?  What is being provided is > > energy, not power. > > From Cambridge dictionary: > energy - the power from something such as electricity or oil that can do > work, such as providing light and

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

Vào lúc 18:17 2022-11-19, Graeme Fitzpatrick đã viết: I do have some concerns about the talk pages though. Over time, I've asked quite a few questions on various talk pages, seeking clarification of tag details, or whether this tag would apply in these circumstances etc. I doubt as many as

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

My experience is that proposals are already announced on several channels other then the current required mailing list. I always had good discussion on several platforms for my proposal. Each community or person has another view which I collect this way. This proposal makes sure there are 2

Re: [Tagging] care services

I don't think that this liste is good. These tags are primary tags. When a restaurant offers different "cuisines" you won't map different POI's with restaurant=chinese and restaurant=japanese, ... You will have only one amenity=restaurant with a subtag cuisine. My question is for a unique

Re: [Tagging] care services

The problem with using the various craft= tags, is that a lot of these sort of home-assistance organisations, don't provide services to the general public, only to those people who qualify for home-care assistance. I was meaning a company selling services to anybody. It's for people who

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

If it is indeed better (which I personally am not convinced), then why not change the proposal to ask that, in addition to the tagging mailing list, proposal might (or should?) be announced at *as many contact channels as possible* of those listed

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

It is perfectly OK we use many channels to communicate, as they each have their specific uses. And our new forum [1] is becoming a vital resource of a community project like OSM. Emphasis on community. One person's opinion: in less than a year, our new forum has grown to a place of

Re: [Tagging] care services

Once again, we bump up against the reality of a worldwide project, with many different cultures, attempting to squeeze particular meaning into a single tag. Look at Minh's "around here" clarification (true, I'm near him). And once again, we find that English can distinctly lack in its ability

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power utility office

sent from a phone > On 18 Nov 2022, at 22:35, Mike Thompson wrote: > > In a nearby city to where I live, the city owned utility provides > electricity, water, sewer, and internet. yes, it is also common in areas I know to have a single provider for water, sewer, waste disposal and even

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power utility office

sent from a phone > On 18 Nov 2022, at 22:56, Mike Thompson wrote: > >> Energy and power are used quite interchangeably and power is the better word >> for it. >> > > What evidence do you have that is the case? What is being provided is > energy, not power. maybe we can agree they

Re: [Tagging] care services

Vào lúc 04:12 2022-11-19, Georges Dutreix via Tagging đã viết: My question is for a unique company providing different services for assistance at home, but the goal is not healthcare. Probably office=home_aide could be good, I am questionning english native speakers for the right word. In

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power utility office

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:45:58PM +0200, Dimitar wrote: > Energy and power are used quite interchangeably and power is the better word > for it. That is just plain wrong. They have different dimensions. ael ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:12:22 +0100 (CET), Cartographer10 via Tagging wrote: > I always had good discussion on several platforms for my proposal. Each > community or person has another view > which I collect this way. Nobody (at least I hope) questions that extra communities (or extra persons

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

Vào lúc 17:24 2022-11-19, Matija Nalis đã viết: On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:12:22 +0100 (CET), Cartographer10 via Tagging wrote: This proposal makes sure there are 2 required platforms where people have to announce it. That way people have the choice to follow one of the two channels of their

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 11:58, Minh Nguyen wrote: > direct interested mappers to the wiki talk page, where hopefully others > can engage as necessary. > I do have some concerns about the talk pages though. Over time, I've asked quite a few questions on various talk pages, seeking clarification

Re: [Tagging] care services

On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:12:09 +0100, Georges Dutreix via Tagging wrote: > I don't think that this liste is good. These tags are primary tags. When > a restaurant offers different "cuisines" you won't map different POI's > with restaurant=chinese and restaurant=japanese, ... You will have only