> is the approximative way to place a label and is rendered by mapnik
> is IMHO the "correct" way to do it, but is not recognized by Mapnik.
> This is an result of Mapnik rendering the node as a label and
> rendering the name of _any_ area at high zoom levels. It doesn't
> recognize the boundary re
I was basing this off what Germany OSMers apparently do [1]. I'm not too set
on it though.
-Josh
[1]:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#11_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries
On Feb 25, 2011 5:15 PM, "Nathan Edgars II" wrote:
> On 2/25/2011 7:54 AM, Josh Doe
On 2/25/2011 7:54 AM, Josh Doe wrote:
The reason I use boundary=administrative is because Burke Centre and
the "Neighborhoods" and "Clusters" do have administrative roles. Burke
Centre is a homeowners association (HOA) that has what some would
consider governmental powers, collecting "assessments
I agree that the boundary relation is the "correct" way to do this.
From the wiki, it appears that the 'label' role is accepted.
Is it just that Mapnik hasn't gotten around to rendering this yet, or
is there some other reason? I really should try and learn about
Mapnik...
Regards,
-Josh
On Fri,
2011/2/25 Tyler Gunn :
> Example One:
> - "place=suburb" node central to neighborhood:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1168219909
is the approximative way to place a label and is rendered by mapnik
> - Boundary relation with the the "place" node marked as a label:
> http://www.ope
The reason I use boundary=administrative is because Burke Centre and
the "Neighborhoods" and "Clusters" do have administrative roles. Burke
Centre is a homeowners association (HOA) that has what some would
consider governmental powers, collecting "assessments" (aka taxes),
enforcing standards with
> I don't think boundary=administrative is appropriate. I'd use
> landuse=residential name=* with no other tags for a simple subdivision. This
> ends up rendering reasonably:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.4285&lon=-81.4944&zoom=14&layers=M
These are civic recognized sub-areas and neig
On 2/25/2011 12:10 AM, Josh Doe wrote:
I am interest in knowing the best way to do this as well. I'm working
on mapping my area, which is called Burke Centre, which is further
divided into five "neighborhoods", and those are broken down into a
further 65 "clusters". The one cluster I've labeled i
I am interest in knowing the best way to do this as well. I'm working
on mapping my area, which is called Burke Centre, which is further
divided into five "neighborhoods", and those are broken down into a
further 65 "clusters". The one cluster I've labeled is just a way:
http://www.openstreetmap.or
What is the "proper" way to tag a boundary for a suburb? I'm trying to avoid
using "place=suburb" nodes as they don't accurately capture the boundaries of
the neighbourhoods I'm attempting to map.
I've been playing around with this in my area and came up with two examples:
Example One:
- "plac
10 matches
Mail list logo
