On 08.08.2013 11:10, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Can I have
waterway=dam
highway=*
you could, but I'd suggest to use distinct objects and add layer tags to one in
order to define stacking.
I think that one single object should suffice as long as the dam and the
road don't have different
2013/8/10 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at
I think that one single object should suffice as long as the dam and the
road don't have different names or something. We don't make separate
objects for highway=* and embankment=* either. However, I am afraid that
some renderers are too dumb to
Il giorno 08/ago/2013, alle ore 02:13, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
Can I have
waterway=dam
highway=*
you could, but I'd suggest to use distinct objects and add layer tags to one in
order to define stacking.
Cheers,
Martin
Hi,
Thanks to all who responded.
On 2013-08-08 06:40, malenki wrote :
You could map the dam as area with the highway crossing it.
Yes, I finally did that. Even if the dam is a mere 6.5 m wide, it makes
sense.
On 2013-08-08 02:49, Paul Johnson wrote :
I don't see how those tags are mutually
I don't see how those tags are mutually exclusive. As for a dam being a
waterway, makes about as much sense as highway=traffic_signals to me.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:13 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
The waterway=dam http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dam definition
Am Thu, 08 Aug 2013 02:13:38 +0200
schrieb André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi,
The waterway=dam http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dam definition
is all well but it doesn't give a damn about what runs on top ;-)
Can I have
waterway=dam
highway=*
?
You could map the dam as area
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:13 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
The waterway=dam http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dam definition is
all well but it doesn't give a damn about what runs on top ;-)
...
And, once again, I'm baffled by a dam being a waterway, like a crossing
being a
