Hi,
intrigeri wrote (05 Dec 2012 14:03:56 GMT) :
I'm happy to do the Debian part of the work if I know someone will do
the Tails -specific part: audit, SOCKS support, etc. Just tell me :)
Maybe related to:
http://bugs.debian.org/681652
http://bugs.debian.org/679528
Hi,
2013/1/12, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org:
OK, great, thanks for the research!
What version were you looking at?
Version 1.9 (it's the source tarball that you can download from the
official site)
I've added a summary of this information to the ticket, and generally
updated to clarify the
Hi,
2013/1/12, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org:
I'd like to make sure we don't start shipping a piece of software while
suspecting it will be broken once Tails is based on Wheezy. The path
to Wheezy will be hard enough.
This was already clear to me. Thanks for your great work on this issue :-)
Hi,
Alessandro Grassi wrote (11 Jan 2013 18:47:28 GMT) :
2012/12/18, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org:
Did you already send this patch to them, by the way?
(If not, I encourage you to do so :)
I sent a mail to the mantainer but he didn't answer (yet).
OK, good to hear. I suggest pinging them
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (05 Dec 2012 14:03:56 GMT) :
I'd like to make sure we don't start shipping a piece of software
while knowing it will be broken once Tails is based on Wheezy, so
I could see what's happening in Debian on the GStreamer front for this
bug. Apparently, the upstream fix [1] is
Hi,
Alessandro Grassi wrote (15 Dec 2012 15:09:13 GMT) :
Ok, I removed that last part from the patch. The upstream mantainer
will decide what's best :)
Did you already send this patch to them, by the way?
(If not, I encourage you to do so :)
So, the question now becomes: how does the stored
Hi,
2012/12/14, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org:
[..] that should be for another orthogonal patch: no sane
upstream maintainer will accept a patch that supposedly implements
SOCKS5 support, but also silently changes the behaviour for HTTP
proxy users. See what I mean? :)
Ok, I removed that last
Alessandro Grassi wrote (07 Dec 2012 13:07:30 GMT) :
2012/12/6, Alessandro Grassi alessandro@gmail.com:
I want to try adding it myself. It should be a matter of parsing
SOCKS5_SERVER environment variable and passing address, port etc. to
the appropriate class. HTTP proxy is implemented
Hi,
Alessandro Grassi wrote (06 Dec 2012 20:59:28 GMT) :
Also, I found it has an autosuggest feature which sends what you are
typing to Google. Is it bad for us?
It would be much better if this could be disabled.
Sending typed strings to the Internet beforme Enter is pressed
conflicts with
Hi,
2012/12/12, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org:
It seems like the maybeSetSystemProxy() is now called only if neither
a SOCKS5 nor a HTTP proxy is configured, which effectively ignores
system settings for specific URLs. If this change of behaviour is
needed, then it should be documented; and if
Alessandro Grassi:
2012/12/5, adrelanos adrela...@riseup.net:
And while you're on it, could you ask if there are any (flash-)cookies
or other relevant stuff which could be used for tracking?
A quick search in the source tree revealed just two instances of the
word cookie, and both are
Hi,
2012/12/5, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org:
Cool. Do you intend to ask for SOCKS support there?
I want to try adding it myself. It should be a matter of parsing
SOCKS5_SERVER environment variable and passing address, port etc. to
the appropriate class. HTTP proxy is implemented this way,
Hi,
Alessandro Grassi wrote (04 Dec 2012 18:51:22 GMT) :
No, but here's the author's forum:
http://flavio.tordini.org/forums/forum/minitube-forums
Cool. Do you intend to ask for SOCKS support there?
Also, I'd like to be sure we're not affected by Debian bug #666773.
That problem happened to
intrigeri:
Hi,
Alessandro Grassi wrote (04 Dec 2012 18:51:22 GMT) :
No, but here's the author's forum:
http://flavio.tordini.org/forums/forum/minitube-forums
Cool. Do you intend to ask for SOCKS support there?
And while you're on it, could you ask if there are any (flash-)cookies
or
Hi,
2012/12/3, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org:
Looks promising! I've not looked very far, but I have not found any
upstream bug tracker. Did you find one?
No, but here's the author's forum:
http://flavio.tordini.org/forums/forum/minitube-forums
Also, I'd like to be sure we're not affected by
2012/12/1, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org:
Any clean (i.e. non-torsocks) way to make it use SOCKS instead?
There isn't any socks-specific code, but it uses QNetworkProxy class
which supports socks5 too. A patch should be doable.
One should think of potential security issues and anonymity
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (01 Dec 2012 18:56:01 GMT) :
To ease further testing, I've prepared a backport of minitube 1.9-1,
and pushed a feature/minitube branch that installs it + the
GStreamer Phonon backend. I've not tested it yet.
It seems to work fine!
I've created a ticket to track the next
Hi,
Alessandro Grassi wrote (30 Nov 2012 17:22:12 GMT) :
I tested minitube on Tails 0.15. It's a standalone Youtube client which
does not need flash player (and can download videos, too).
Awesome!
To ease further testing, I've prepared a backport of minitube 1.9-1,
and pushed a
18 matches
Mail list logo
