Same happens to me. It works and looks great until I show my boss or client.
Alvaro
tedd wrote:
At 10:44 AM -0500 3/6/07, csnyder wrote:
On 3/5/07, Paul Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It always seems that it's the gatekeepers of life who run
funky web browsers. It will be the people at your
tedd wrote:
And don't forget that the first time you show anyone anything you've
programmed, it's going to fail regardless of how many times you have
tested it. Or, at least that's been my experience -- but perhaps I'm the
only SOB that this happens to. :-)
I wish you were...
--
Allen Shaw
P
At 10:44 AM -0500 3/6/07, csnyder wrote:
On 3/5/07, Paul Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It always seems that it's the gatekeepers of life who run
funky web browsers. It will be the people at your next job interview,
the venture capitalists, the thesis advisor, the people on the grant
committee
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:44:34 -0500, csnyder wrote
> On 3/5/07, Paul Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It always seems that it's the gatekeepers of life who run
> > funky web browsers. It will be the people at your next job interview,
> > the venture capitalists, the thesis advisor, the people on
On 3/5/07, Paul Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It always seems that it's the gatekeepers of life who run
funky web browsers. It will be the people at your next job interview,
the venture capitalists, the thesis advisor, the people on the grant
committee, who have cookies or Javascript turned of
Cliff Hirsch wrote:
Whatever happened to building a robust PHP application and only then
layering on the client-side enhancements? To me this lack of
progressive fall-back is just laziness, arrogance, or the victim of
the usual time pressures. This isn’t an opinionated group — right?! So
I c
On 2/26/07, Chris Shiflett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's the best-of-breed solution for changing a regular form submission
button to initiate an Ajax call instead of submitting the form? I've got
a hacky solution that involves rewriting the button, adding an
onsubmit() action, and trying to
Chris Snyder wrote:
> I'm a big fan of the "unobtrusive" approach, where you build
> interfaces in Plain Old HTML + CSS and then use wicked DOM
> mojo to convert them into rich applications on the client. If
> Javascript isn't available, everything still works but with a
> lot more clicking.
This
Cliff Hirsch cliff-at-pinestream.com |nyphp dev/internal group use| wrote:
On 2/26/07 6:28 PM, "csnyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/26/07, Cliff Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm seeing more and more applications that simply do not work if JavaScript
is turned off. In fact, I
On 2/26/07 6:28 PM, "csnyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/26/07, Cliff Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I'm seeing more and more applications that simply do not work if JavaScript
>> is turned off. In fact, I'm looking at purchasing a slick shopping cart that
>> seems great, but I t
On 2/26/07, Cliff Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm seeing more and more applications that simply do not work if JavaScript
is turned off. In fact, I'm looking at purchasing a slick shopping cart that
seems great, but I think the lack of progressive fallback is a show stopper.
I'm a big f
Cliff Hirsch cliff-at-pinestream.com |nyphp dev/internal group use| wrote:
I’m seeing more and more applications that simply do not work if
JavaScript is turned off. In fact, I’m looking at purchasing a slick
shopping cart that seems great, but I think the lack of progressive
fallback is a sho
At 9:26 AM -0500 2/26/07, Cliff Hirsch wrote:
I'm seeing more and more applications that simply do not work if
JavaScript is turned off. In fact, I'm looking at purchasing a slick
shopping cart that seems great, but I think the lack of progressive
fallback is a show stopper.
Whatever happened
Hi
If we are writing howtos and documentations, we can avoid javascript, but
when doing coding for an earning, we need buyers, where the real money is..
Just tell me now a days how many of you will create a webpage which will
look like a standard howto documentation? With just Hx, b, p, dl, ul
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:08:19 -0500
"Mark Withington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree. With absolutely no data to back this up, I bet any "serious"
> web user has JavaScript on and probably [relatively] up-to-date on
> their browser version.
On the contrary.. "serious" web users have it tur
I usually use http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
as a rough guide. It shows 94% JavaScript on, 6% off for January 2007.
Be a little careful generalizing this number as applied to
shopping cards.
In many cases, JaveScript is off for people coming from behind corpora
/browsers_stats.asp as a rough
> guide. It shows 94% JavaScript on, 6% off for January 2007.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mark Withington
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 10:08 AM
> To: NYPHP Talk
> Subjec
Talk
Subject: Re: [nyphp-talk] Thoughts on using JavaScript with no progressive
fall-back
I agree. With absolutely no data to back this up, I bet any "serious"
web user has JavaScript on and probably [relatively] up-to-date on their
browser version. So, like the proverbial Willy Su
I have a split opinion on this.
I've set up a lot of applications where javascript really was required
for some things that I wanted to do. Sometimes it really just isn't an
option. However, I think it's good practice to at least *warn* the user
that javascript is required. This is really true
I agree. With absolutely no data to back this up, I bet any "serious"
web user has JavaScript on and probably [relatively] up-to-date on
their browser version. So, like the proverbial Willy Sutton reply,
[Why do you rob banks, Willy?] "Cause that's where the money is"
Why do we write code with
Cliff Hirsch wrote:
I'm seeing more and more applications that simply do not work if
JavaScript is turned off. In fact, I'm looking at purchasing a slick
shopping cart that seems great, but I think the lack of progressive
fallback is a show stopper.
Whatever happened to building a robust PHP
21 matches
Mail list logo
