Margie Roswell wrote:
I admit to being disappointed in viewership on this one.
Can anyone help to get the word out about this video?
Those who know about the video are probably using JOSM. Potlach's target
audience who would benefit from the video probably does not read the
mailing lists...
http://bit.ly/dceDqc
Apologies to those who get their New Scientist closer to publication date
The team working on Haiti mapping get a good write up here
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Roy Wallace wrote:
I suspect you will have opponents, though, because having physical
characteristics that can accommodate a bike is not verifiable.
Actually I think it is verifiable as cycleways have design characteristics
which provide inspiration for this ability to
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
this is valid for England and maybe Scotland and Wales (and
probably some other countries), but it is not working on a
worldwide basis. Your definition would in most of central Europe
not be functioning: routers would lead pedestrians in areas
where they are
In your letter dated Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:18:09 +0100 you wrote:
Am 03.02.2010 00:38, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hi,
NopMap wrote:
In contrast, I believe that there actually are people who try to listen to
the sorrows of (potential) newcomers and want to lower the learning curve.
Way too few,
Margie Roswell wrote:
I admit to being disappointed in viewership on this one.
Can anyone help to get the word out about this video?
Video's great!
A couple of good places to promote it would be:
- newbies@ mailing list
- http://forum.openstreetmap.org/ (log on with your usual
- Potlatch
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
And your
argument that people won't tag highway=cycleway; foot=no but will tag
highway=path; bicycle=designated; foot=no is batshit insane.
IMHO, the argument is perfectly valid. The problem with highway=cycleway
and pedestrians isn't that adding a foot=no would be too
Any way, back to the original post Nokia is saying Nav4All's is wrong...
http://www.tietokone.fi/uutiset/nokia_kiistaa_kilpailijan_navigoinnin_tappamisen
Tobias Knerr wrote:
IMHO, the argument is perfectly valid. The problem with highway=
cycleway and pedestrians isn't that adding a foot=no would be
too much effort. The problem is that some people, while they
wouldn't mind adding it, don't know that they need to add it in the
first place.
Generally, the more implicit assumptions you associate with a
tag, the
more probable it is that someone's implicit assumptions are
different
from yours. That's why a largely meaningless object like path
has a
certain appeal.
I've always felt (whatever the wiki says) that path is a vague
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
...routers would lead pedestrians in areas where they are not allowed to
walk (cycleways).
Nonsense. There'll be a footway alongside that they can use (99.999%
of the time).
If you want to micro-map a footway as
Hi,
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
That is 300 times more open to misinterpretation than the cycleway example.
Yet we cope.
That's because the English have been trained to cope with stuff that
nobody else understands for approximately the last 500 years, by way of
ball games.
--- start quote
Richard Mann wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
...routers would lead pedestrians in areas where they are not allowed to
walk (cycleways).
Nonsense. There'll be a footway alongside that they can use (99.999%
of the time).
If you want
Thanks Andy, after all these years I finally understand cricket.
My life is complete.
Adrian.
--- On Wed, 3/2/10, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@googlemail.com
wrote:
From: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Nav4All navigation
Thanks Richard, David, and Jean-Marc. All good ideas.
(I didn't even know about the forum until just now.)
I'll probably tackle the page of video tutorials later tonight.
(Anyone have any favorites out there?)
Best Regards,
Margie
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Richard Fairhurst
2010/2/3 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
Um, yes, I do know the rules vary between countries.
Firstly, like I say, you can accept that highway=cycleway implies foot=yes
and bicycle=yes. Which it does for exactly the same reason that the tags are
in English, the server code is in Ruby
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I don't think that the line is between hobby and professional.
OSM with their volunteers does one kind of mapping, and TeleAtlas with
their vans does another kind of mapping. Each has its own distinctive
advantages. There are professional users wo spend money on OSM
John Smith wrote:
No but it's a carrot, most people most of the time are only going to
map what they can see turn up on mapnik.
This point is correct, to bring the thread back to on topic, OSM is
best promoted, not by word of mouth as some have said, but by
visualization mouth.
People
Hi,
Dave F. wrote:
The commercial maps have fixed tagging schemes, minimum quality
standards and only accept trained personnel as mappers. They have long
turnaround times and cost a lot of money to maintain. At OSM we have no
fixed tagging schema, *no minimum quality standards*
you see
Hi,
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
well, the chap that first used cycleway might have been an Englishman,
and might have had in mind that pedestrians are allowed, when tagging
highway=cycleway, but there is absolutely no logic or natural
meaning for cycleways to deduct access rights for
2010/2/3 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Maybe whoever used it first did not think about access rights.
Yes, I'm sure he didn't. We notice these things as the project evolves.
OSM always
has been a very pragmatic project, and more about what is possible than what
is allowed. And there is
On 3 February 2010 15:32, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Whether the map use is to make money or not , if these ventures aren't
taking the data because it's unusable then OSM has to be considered to
be failing. Again, disillusioning.
I think the single most important reason why
On 3 February 2010 15:38, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
John Smith wrote:
No but it's a carrot, most people most of the time are only going to
map what they can see turn up on mapnik.
This point is correct, to bring the thread back to on topic, OSM is
best promoted, not by word
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
well, the chap that first used cycleway might have been an Englishman,
and might have had in mind that pedestrians are allowed, when tagging
highway=cycleway, but there is absolutely no logic or natural
meaning for cycleways to deduct access rights for pedestrians.
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Dave F. wrote:
The commercial maps have fixed tagging schemes, minimum quality
standards and only accept trained personnel as mappers. They have
long turnaround times and cost a lot of money to maintain. At OSM we
have no fixed tagging schema, *no minimum quality
Hi,
Dave F. wrote:
Please take that in context with its following sentence. Can you show me
a router that can get me door to door no matter where I live?
Or a search utility that returns no false-positives?
Not with OSM, nor with any other dataset available for any amount of money.
OSM
2010/2/3 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
What matters is the context in which that key/value has been used in
OSM. And in that case, it's historically been used to imply pedestrian
rights too.
OK. And where can I find this information? If it is not findable,
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
OK. And where can I find this information? If it is not findable,
it will not be used.
Well, there's the rub. As a project, we are crap at documentation. Beyond
crap. How anyone ever manages to get started with OSM amazes me.
(And if you'll excuse me a hobby-horse,
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Dave F. wrote:
Please take that in context with its following sentence. Can you show
me a router that can get me door to door no matter where I live?
Or a search utility that returns no false-positives?
Not with OSM, nor with any other dataset available for any
Emilie Laffray wrote:
On 3 February 2010 15:38, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
mailto:dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
John Smith wrote:
No but it's a carrot, most people most of the time are only going to
map what they can see turn up on mapnik.
This point is
Hi,
so what about creating a small web application (data exportable into Excel
etc.), with a database containing tagging schemes, their idioms, and possible
aquivalent semantics?
We can get the tagging statistics from tagwatch (I think this won't be enough,
I think they do only statistics
In your letter dated Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:52:01 +0100 you wrote:
Well, I'm personally mapping holes in fences ;-), still it _is_
forbidden to walk on a German/Dutch/French/Italian cycleway, you might
get fined (or get problems in case of an accident).
Sorry, it's perfectly alright to walk on a
In your letter dated Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:03:09 + you wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
But the routing/tagging of OSM doesn't fit anything at the moment.
Huh?
Please take that in context with its following sentence. Can you show me
a router that can get me door to door no matter where I live?
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
that we still have a Beginners' Guide on the wiki which focuses on the
non-beginners' editor.)
I didn't find the Beginners' Guide of 2 years ago helpful.
No I didn't write a new one.
Yes I did help someone with writing one which was published
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Roy Wallace wrote:
I suspect you will have opponents, though, because having physical
characteristics that can accommodate a bike is not verifiable.
Actually I think it is verifiable as cycleways have design
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
That is 300 times more open to misinterpretation than the cycleway example.
Yet we cope.
So you're arguing that, because you guys are able to cope, these
kind of tags are necessarily a good idea? The only thing they
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Ah, but the rules have changed. We now have three umpires. The third stays
in but decides if those who are in are out if those umpires who are out are
unsure whether those who are in are out or in.
This certainly makes the rules a lot simpler don't
Hi people.
I'm sending this mail in order to propose a new feature for the tag landuse:
gated communities. These are a type of private neighbourhoods that are very
common in Argentina, Brazil and many other countries, and have a notorious
difference with ordinary city neighbourhoods.
If you are
I second that question. I'd love to be able to attend the conference again.
Cheers,
Arlindo Pereira
2010/1/25 maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com:
Are there plans on doing a similar fundraising for the SOTM 2010 scholarship?
--
cheers,
maning
2010/2/3 Chango640 chango...@gmail.com:
Hi people.
I'm sending this mail in order to propose a new feature for the tag landuse:
gated communities. These are a type of private neighbourhoods that are very
common in Argentina, Brazil and many other countries, and have a notorious
difference
Hi Guys,
I think Mikel is going to organise the same scholarship he was
involved with last year. He might have some more info.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Arlindo Pereira
openstreet...@arlindopereira.com wrote:
I second that question. I'd love to be able to attend the conference again.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you sure it
wouldn't be better to push for amenity=cafe;bakery;atm style
multi-tagging instead?
IIRC, there is opposition to multi-tagging - (I can't remember
exactly who said that or why, though...I suspect it's
I thought about using landusehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse
=residential
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential(which
I'm already using in cities and towns), but here in Argentina there
is a strong difference between ordinary neighbourhoods and gated
On 4 February 2010 06:24, Chango640 chango...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sending this mail in order to propose a new feature for the tag landuse:
gated communities. These are a type of private neighbourhoods that are very
common in Argentina, Brazil and many other countries, and have a notorious
2010/2/3 Chango640 chango...@gmail.com:
I thought about using landuse=residential (which I'm already using in cities
and towns), but here in Argentina there is a strong difference between
ordinary neighbourhoods and gated communities.
Yes, that's what you are expressing with the subtags
On 4 February 2010 08:50, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIR the barrier=fence should not be applied to an area, what means
in pratical to draw a second way atop the area limits (not really
elegant). Another approach is to tag fenced=yes to the area (don't
know if someone
Hello,
The user osm_king (formerly n_ward) as been doing vandalism edits:
building shaped like a penis, insulting changeset comments, creating
ways in the middle of the Atlantic ...
I kindly asked him to stop and got the following answer:
Thanks for your feedback, but you can shove it up
Nakor wrote:
Hello,
The user osm_king (formerly n_ward) as been doing vandalism edits:
building shaped like a penis,
Yeah, I know, it's disgusting what those vandals get up to with their
spray cans. ;-)
http://www.neatorama.com/2007/07/17/homer-and-the-cerne-abbas-giant/
But you're
On 4 February 2010 12:04, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
But you're right, he probably should be terminated.
Is blocking the account going to be enough to prevent someone from
simply signing up for a new account and continuing to do what they
were unabbated, seems like a cat and mouse
John Smith wrote:
On 4 February 2010 12:04, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
But you're right, he probably should be terminated.
Is blocking the account going to be enough to prevent someone from
simply signing up for a new account and continuing to do what they
were unabbated, seems like a
On 4 February 2010 14:58, Randy rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com wrote:
Maybe a more subtle approach would work, i.e., have a bot remove his edits
x days after they are saved. That way he can make his changes, show his
similarly idiotic friends what he has done, and they will be deleted when
he no
Hello Roy,
1) Do you want all that detail?
Yes please :)
I understand why you want all that data, but very little of it is being
visualized through www.openstreetmap.org, leading on to your next comment:
But I don't have my own database - I want to use the OSM database...
If you are not
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Ian Mc Shane ianmcsh...@live.co.za wrote:
From what I understand the openstreetmap.org map is purely for show and not
meant to be THE place to view all the data... its up to other groups to show
what they want e.g. cloudmade, cyclemap, etc...
Yup, this is
John Smith wrote:
Maybe a more subtle approach would work, i.e., have a bot remove his edits
x days after they are saved. That way he can make his changes, show his
similarly idiotic friends what he has done, and they will be deleted when
he no longer has an interest in them.
+1
Paging
Hoi Lennard,
Ik neem aan dat het om dezelfde gegevens gaat als op:
http://3dshapes.openstreetmap.nl/
Als er een mogelijkheid om de gemeenten Beesel en Venlo (inclusief
Tegelen, Belfeld) te importeren kan ik daar aan verder werken.
Bijvoorbeeld:
Er ontbreekt nieuwbouw in dit gebied:
Rene,
Een paar antwoorden op je opmerkingen:
* Ontbreken van nieuwbouw: de 3dshapes data is niet helemaal recent.
Ik meen dat het de situatie is van 2008. Voor 99% van de gevallen zal
het wel goed zijn.
* Landgebruik overlapt met paden: een GPS track kan altijd een
afwijking hebben van een
Lennard wrote:
Michiel Faber wrote:
Ik weet niet hoe het proces precies loopt en wat ik nodig heb.
Wie kan mij vertellen wat ik dan moet doen en eventueel helpen/begeleiden.
Zoals Frank en theun wel kunnen beamen, is importeren van deze landuse
een intensief proces, voorzien van de
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 23:09:53 YRS wrote:
Het lijkt mij veel meerwaarde hebben als een blinden met door een gps
redelijk in de buurt van een startpunt van een geleidelijn geleid kunnen
worden. Dan is het dus erg zinvol in mijn ogen om deze lijnen te mappen?
Het lijkt mij heel nuttig
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Arie Paap wrote:
However Potlatch exposes
deleted ways:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potlatch/Primer#Undoing_mistakes
So I use that to undelete the way and then continue editing (or switch
back to JOSM)
very good point
I'm glad you raised this. This area really
On 3 February 2010 19:29, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Often newbies spend a lot of time putting in something and need a quick pick-
me-up help so they don't get totally discouraged when all their hard work has
been wasted.
Maybe there should be a tutorial mode added to potlatch, with some
@ http://apcmag.com/google-maps-bug-forces-melburnians-down-toll-roads.htm
A bug in Google Maps Australia is forcing people down costly toll
roads whether they like it or not.
Just a thought - might be a nice reminder to check how we are doing on
this front in OSM?
On 3 February 2010 19:46, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a thought - might be a nice reminder to check how we are doing on
this front in OSM?
I've seen some toll booths marked, not sure how any of the routing
engines deals with it however.
In Brisbane gMaps keeps sending me via
I spent a couple of days in Canberra recently. Getting around via the
OSM maps was great - everything there and accurate.
But, when I wanted to find a church on Sunday morning, I could only
find one, and sorry, wrong denomination. Maybe a few more churches (all
faiths) could be added to the
On 3 February 2010 21:24, Richard Colless fire...@ar.com.au wrote:
could be added to the POI's. Also had a bit of trouble locating a convenient
petrol station - a lot were Unnamed. Not helpful when you have a wallet
full of Coles or Woolworths discount vouchers.
It might be useful to clarify
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:37 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
It might be useful to clarify things when it comes to Coles Express
and Woolworths locations as to what the operator/naming should be
I use name=Woolworths for Woolworths petrol stations. Have never used
the operator=*
Roy Wallace wrote:
I use name=Woolworths for Woolworths petrol stations. Have never used
the operator=* tag - should I?
I haven't seen any difference to the rendering with or without the
operator tag.
What I do find useful is the inclusion of a place name when looking at
the list of outlets
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:29 AM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
I use name=Woolworths for Woolworths petrol stations. Have never used
the operator=* tag - should I?
I haven't seen any difference to the rendering with or without the
operator tag.
Thanks for the response, but I'm not
On 4 February 2010 07:58, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the name actually Woolworths Renmark, though? If not, it
shouldn't be in the name tag...(right?)
Should be what ever the registered business name or company name is.
___
Talk-au
Seems Openmtbmap has recently got 'sea polygons' organized. :)
Here is a Mapsource Noosa view. It's not 100% for the entire coastline, but
it's pretty damn good.
http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/6421/noosamtb.jpg
Regards
John k
___
Talk-au
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:37 AM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
Is the name actually Woolworths Renmark, though? If not, it
shouldn't be in the name tag...(right?)
Strictly correct. But finding the right name for the particular outlet
isn't necessarily easy. Searching
Roy Wallace wrote:
I use name=Woolworths for Woolworths petrol stations. Have never used
the operator=* tag - should I?
I haven't seen any difference to the rendering with or without the
operator tag.
What I do find useful is the inclusion of a place name when looking at
the list of
On 4 February 2010 13:01, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Can we document on the wiki which is Operator and which is Name
(for Australia) because I never found it to make sense
I suspect Operator is the franchise name - am I right?
I've been setting the Operator to the fuel they supply, eg
Can we document on the wiki which is Operator and which is Name
(for Australia) because I never found it to make sense
I suspect Operator is the franchise name - am I right?
IMHO, Operator should act like a controlled vocabulary with a small
number of choices. For ATMs, for example, Operator
On 4 February 2010 13:44, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I've only checked Citylink here, but I notice that neither Mapnik nor
Osmarender renders tollroads any differently. How strange.
Why is it strange that no one put in a request to have them render differently?
On 4 February 2010 16:01, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
+1. e.g. for Woolworths Caltex petrol, is it Woolworths or Caltex? For
those with a discount voucher they're probably more interested in
looking for Woolworths stations than Caltex stations...
I usually set name=Woolworths
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Not only have they created sea polygons but they have turned the land
into polygons also. The only way to do it.
John Kitchener wrote:
Seems Openmtbmap has recently got 'sea polygons' organized. :)
Here is a Mapsource Noosa view. It's not 100%
Pessoal,
Gostaria de convidá-los para mais uma mapping party em Sao Paulo, a ser feita
neste fim de semana. Onde mapearemos ainda está em aberto, peço a todos que
participem para ajudarmos o projeto.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/S%C3%A3o_Paulo_Feb_2010_Mapping_Party
Um abraço,
Diogo
Stefan Schwan schrieb:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Baarle-Nassau_fronti%C3%A8re_caf%C3%A9.jpg
Wie ist das, wenn ich hier mit einem Fuss in NL, mit dem anderen in B
stehe und jemanden verkloppe[1]? Komme ich dann in NL oder in B
ins Gefängnis? ;-)
ist sogar schon auf
Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2010, 01:35 +0100 schrieb Stefan Schwan:
Hallo
Bei nur wenigen Markern kannst du den entsprechenden JS Code einfach
per PHP in einer Schleife einfügen.
Es geht nur um einen Einzigen: seine Heimat. Alle anderen werden
statisch und unverschiebbar eingefügt.
echo var
Chris-Hein Lunkhusen glaubte zu wissen:
Stefan Schwan schrieb:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Baarle-Nassau_fronti%C3%A8re_caf%C3%A9.jpg
Wie ist das, wenn ich hier mit einem Fuss in NL, mit dem anderen in B
stehe und jemanden verkloppe[1]? Komme ich dann in NL oder in B
ins Gefängnis?
Am 3. Februar 2010 09:47 schrieb Chris-Hein Lunkhusen chris66...@gmx.de:
Stefan Schwan schrieb:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Baarle-Nassau_fronti%C3%A8re_caf%C3%A9.jpg
Wie ist das, wenn ich hier mit einem Fuss in NL, mit dem anderen in B
stehe und jemanden verkloppe[1]? Komme ich dann
Am 03.02.2010 01:57, schrieb Hanno Böck:
Da ihr grad so schön am diskutieren seid, ich hätt noch eine harte Nuss für
Euch:
Ich hab den Großteil meines bisherigen Lebens in einer Straße verbracht, die
auf der einen Seite Plauener Weg heißt, auf der anderen aber Plauenerweg
Ich hab mal
Ulf Lamping wrote:
P.S: Was erzählst du eigentlich für einen Humbug? Wenn ich auf der
Hauptseite nach turmstrasse suche, bekomme ich beide möglichen
Schreibweisen geliefert!
Kein Humbug. Ich bekomme da nix.
___
Talk-de mailing list
Claudius wrote:
Du hast gelesen, dass sich die Botregel [1] für die Korrektur Straße
auf Deutschland und Österreich beschränkt und eine zweite [2] für
Korrekturen zu Strasse im Gebiet der Schweiz existiert?
Schon klar. Nur, wenn jemand aus der Schweiz diese Zeichen nicht auf der
Tastatur
Nein, die Person hieße dann 'Plauener'. ;)
Gruß,
Martin
Am 03.02.10 schrieb Johann H. Addicks addi...@gmx.net:
Am 03.02.2010 01:57, schrieb Hanno Böck:
Ich hab den Großteil meines bisherigen Lebens in einer Straße verbracht,
die
auf der einen Seite Plauener Weg heißt, auf der anderen aber
hy-soft schrieb:
Nur, wenn jemand aus der Schweiz diese Zeichen nicht auf der
Tastatur hat, dann sucht er in D eben nach Wilhelmstrasse und nicht nach
Wilhelmstraße.
Und wenn dann nichts gefunden wird -bei mir ist das so- ist es eben
frustrierend und der user wird dann eben nicht bei OSM
Am 03.02.2010 14:14, hy-soft:
Ulf Lamping wrote:
P.S: Was erzählst du eigentlich für einen Humbug? Wenn ich auf der
Hauptseite nach turmstrasse suche, bekomme ich beide möglichen
Schreibweisen geliefert!
Kein Humbug. Ich bekomme da nix.
Entweder war der Nomination zu deinem Testzeitpunkt
Am 03.02.2010 14:14, hy-soft:
Ulf Lamping wrote:
P.S: Was erzählst du eigentlich für einen Humbug? Wenn ich auf der
Hauptseite nach turmstrasse suche, bekomme ich beide möglichen
Schreibweisen geliefert!
Kein Humbug. Ich bekomme da nix.
Noch einfacher: Siehst du denn hier die verschiedenen
Tobias Knerr wrote:
Übrigens: Bei mir findet Nominatim für Wilhelmstrasse problemlos auch
Wilhelmstraßen, was die ganze Diskussion ziemlich theoretisch macht..
Also ich habe mal nach
Oberried Hauptstrasse
gesucht und auch nach
Oberried Hauptstr
Da kommt bei mir nix.
die Strasse ist aber da
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:57:09AM +0100, Hanno Böck wrote:
Da ihr grad so schön am diskutieren seid, ich hätt noch eine harte Nuss für
Euch:
Ich hab den Großteil meines bisherigen Lebens in einer Straße verbracht, die
auf der einen Seite Plauener Weg heißt, auf der anderen aber
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 04:12:55PM +0100, Stefan Dettenhofer (StefanDausR)
wrote:
Dieter Jasper schrieb:
Langversion ist sicher besser.
aber die Langform sollte sich nur auf Abkürzungen wie str. etc beziehen.
Eine
D.-Martin-Luther-Straße
sollte m.E. nicht plötzlich zur
Am 3. Februar 2010 14:14 schrieb hy-soft hy-s...@sha-mash.de:
Ulf Lamping wrote:
P.S: Was erzählst du eigentlich für einen Humbug? Wenn ich auf der
Hauptseite nach turmstrasse suche, bekomme ich beide möglichen
Schreibweisen geliefert!
Kein Humbug. Ich bekomme da nix.
bist Du online? Bei
Am 3. Februar 2010 14:45 schrieb hy-soft hy-s...@sha-mash.de:
Tobias Knerr wrote:
Übrigens: Bei mir findet Nominatim für Wilhelmstrasse problemlos auch
Wilhelmstraßen, was die ganze Diskussion ziemlich theoretisch macht..
Also ich habe mal nach
Oberried Hauptstrasse
gesucht und auch nach
Hallo Hy,
Also ich habe mal nach
Oberried Hauptstrasse
gesucht und auch nach
Oberried Hauptstr
Da kommt bei mir nix.
Das liegt aber an einem anderen Problem:
Search terms are processed left to right
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim
Wenn Du also nach Hauptstrasse Oberried
Am 03.02.2010 15:40, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Man sollte mal beginnen, eine internationale (bzw.multinationale)
Ersetzungs-/Abkürzungsliste aufzustellen, oder gibts sowas schon
irgendwo?
Bin auch dafür, genauso wie Bgm. XY Straße für Bürgermeister XY Straße.
Jeder könnte Abkürzungen
Am 03.02.2010 16:01, schrieb Martin Czarkowski:
Am 03.02.2010 15:40, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Man sollte mal beginnen, eine internationale (bzw.multinationale)
Ersetzungs-/Abkürzungsliste aufzustellen, oder gibts sowas schon
irgendwo?
Bin auch dafür, genauso wie Bgm. XY
Florian Lohoff schrieb:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 04:25:03PM +0100, Stefan Dettenhofer (StefanDausR)
wrote:
D. ist unueblich fuer Doktor und sollte von daher entweder zu Dr. oder
Doktor
korrigiert werden.
Bitte NICHT ändern! Das D. ist für den Doktor der Theologie sehr wohl
Am 3. Februar 2010 16:01 schrieb Martin Czarkowski czarkow...@gmail.com:
Am 03.02.2010 15:40, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Man sollte mal beginnen, eine internationale (bzw.multinationale)
Ersetzungs-/Abkürzungsliste aufzustellen, oder gibts sowas schon
irgendwo?
Bin auch dafür, genauso wie
Moin,
bisher wurden bei mir in JOSM (schon etwas aelter: Version 2255) beim
Runterladen von Kartendaten vom Server auch die network-Relationen mit
runtergeladen, die andere Relationen als Mitglieder haben, die ein Mitglied
innerhalb des Gebiets haben.
Das klappt nun nicht mehr. Ich bekomme zwar
Moin,
Am Mittwoch 03. Februar 2010 17:05:00 schrieb Torsten Leistikow:
Woran liegt das? Und vorallem: Was kann ich dagegen tun?
Im Reltaionseditor gibt es die Reiter Merkmalre und Elemente, Eltern-
Relationen und Kind-Relationen. Im zweiten Reiter klickst du auf Neu
laden und dann kommen die
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
