Hi all,
One of my colleagues and I have completed a report on developing multimodal
trip planners. The report focuses on open-source software, and open data
sources such as OpenStreetMap and public transportation data in GTFS format.
The report is available at
Here's another opinion from Wikipedia: The Antero Soriano Highway is
a 2 to 4 lane, 21-kilometer highway transversing through the western
coast of Cavite. It is one of the three major highways located in the
province, the others are Aguinaldo Highway and the Governor's Drive.
I have too much work those days for keeping me up to date to
osm-threads, but what I read here is interessant.
*May I suggest to ask someone to make a proposition and organise a
vote* : I think it worth trying to reach legitimacy and global
agreement about our discussions here, and do not speak
Thanks eMerzh
Stats are in 1 month :
From 117 to 61 unmapped places ( No more for the next update???)
From 390 to 291 sparsely mapped places
great improvements.
What if we created a Belgian project of the week to map, one after the
other these unmapped places.
I bet that very soon we would
Hi Wouter,
Ik heb die trackers liggen: misschien kan je me best bellen voor een
overdracht: 0486756616. Ik heb zelf mijn speelgoed dus veel liggen ze hier
niet te doen.
Kenny
2011/6/9 Wouter Hamelinck wouter.hameli...@gmail.com
Hi all,
As Kenny announced some time ago, Trage Wegen vzw
Hi Nicolas,
This tool ( i speak only for the result i gave) take every node tagged
with place=*
ie place=town, name=Etterbeek
Then the tool count the amount of nodes (every type) around this place
and if it's below a certain number it's flagged as sparsely or if
there is a really low number of
thanks. I see better
--
Nicolas Pettiaux, dr. sc
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
+1 Much appreciated, both the statement itself and Ben's efforts to get it.
Mike
On 15/06/2011 03:36, Richard Weait wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Lastben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised, with apologies for the delay, here is the statement from NearMap
regarding
- Original Message -
From: Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com
To: OpenStreetMap Learned Discussions t...@openstreetmap.org; OSM
Australian Talk List talk...@openstreetmap.org; Licensing and other
legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 2:30 AM
Subject:
As a slightly supplementary question of what to do with data from those
users who have not agreed to the CT's can I make the following suggestion.
Given that we obviously want to move forward with a clean database untainted
by any data which might be incompatible with future licences, AND
- Original Message -
From: Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com
To: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net; OSM Australian Talk List
talk...@openstreetmap.org; Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:48 AM
Subject: Re: [talk-au]
That is why OSM is, and will remain, a do-ocracy.
My crash course to the issues with different government systems:
a) anarchy. Problem: not well fit to a collaborative project
b) dictatorship/monarchy. Someone with enough power decides how it
works. AFAIK SteveC has empowered OSMF this way.
Dear experts,
I rendered some area by mapnik from France and Germany derived from
Europe.osm.bz2.
But some part of them are blue. is it some problem with small coast line in
this case? or no, that is because of some thing else?
please see the attachment.
Thank you in advance,
Saphy
On 15 June 2011 11:56, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:39 +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
On 15 June 2011 09:36, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised, with
On 15 June 2011 09:36, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised, with apologies for the delay, here is the statement from
NearMap regarding submission of derived works of our PhotoMaps to OSM.
Dear Ben,
Hello Everyone,
I am organising event to do online mapping, to increase the enrichment
of OSM maps, also we have set up a lab to train the students and to
make them able to work on OSM on that day.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hack_the_Map
So My point is that, just like mapping parties
Hi all,
This is in reference to the poll here: http://doodle.com/s2zg64vyaup72dcw
An idea: can we try to make this discussion more constructive? I have
tried to do so here, probably with mixed success. I am beginning to be
burdened with non-constructive messages and we really don't have time
Parveen,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Parveen Arora m...@parveenarora.in wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I am organising event to do online mapping, to increase the enrichment
of OSM maps, also we have set up a lab to train the students and to
make them able to work on OSM on that day.
+1 Much appreciated, both the statement itself and Ben's efforts to get it.
Mike
On 15/06/2011 03:36, Richard Weait wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Lastben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised, with apologies for the delay, here is the statement from NearMap
regarding
TimSC wrote:
Richard, can't we just live and let live? You're profile has the wise
words to avoid endless discussions and go do stuff. I think it is
possible since we recently dropped a discussion that was going nowhere,
at your suggestion [5]. I respected your request - live and let live. I
am
Hello
The latest planet file which we have downloaded is OK and we have
started with the import
Since osm2pgsql does not work for us since there is no sufficient memory
we have tried with osmosis
Now the reading part is OK since we have 4GB of ram and we also have an
additional partition over
On 6/15/2011 4:53 AM, Parveen Arora wrote:
Please give your valuable suggestions to make it better, also add the
points that you wants to take care about during this kind of online
event event.
Just a note for the local venue - in many recent cases, the student
edit activities will result
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:33 +0200, Michael Collinson wrote:
As per the implementation plan [1], we intend to move to phase 4 this
Sunday 19th June or as soon after as is technically practical. This will
mean that anyone who has explicitly declined the new contributor terms
will no longer be
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
Just a note for the local venue - in many recent cases, the student edit
activities will result in an automatic block on that IP address. The
automatic block is necessary to block those downloading large areas via the
API.
You
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 6/15/2011 4:53 AM, Parveen Arora wrote:
Please give your valuable suggestions to make it better, also add the
points that you wants to take care about during this kind of online
event event.
Just a note for the local venue -
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Parveen Arora m...@parveenarora.in wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I am organising event to do online mapping, to increase the enrichment
of OSM maps, also we have set up a lab to train the students and to
make them able to work on OSM on that day.
I'm also very interested in this.
Thanks John
On 15 June 2011 06:44, Andy Street m...@andystreet.me.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:33 +0200, Michael Collinson wrote:
As per the implementation plan [1], we intend to move to phase 4 this
Sunday 19th June or as soon after as is
On 6/15/2011 7:00 AM, Parveen Arora wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Mike Nnice...@att.net wrote:
Just a note for the local venue - in many recent cases, the student edit
activities will result in an automatic block on that IP address. The
automatic block is necessary to block those
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
First of all, thanks for your valuable response.
I'm sure there have been similar events before.
Yes, I also thinks that there are many.
I apologize for being
critical of your event. It seems to me that training new
- Original Message -
From: Andy Street m...@andystreet.me.uk
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Announce: Beginning of Phase 4 of license change
process
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:33 +0200, Michael Collinson wrote:
As per
Mike Collinson wrote:
I would emphasise there is currently no need to remove data from the
live database since the license is still CC-BY-SA. I believe there is no
urgency to do so until acceptances have been maximised, local issues
that have a near term solution have been addressed and
On 15/06/11 11:44, Andy Street wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:33 +0200, Michael Collinson wrote:
As per the implementation plan [1], we intend to move to phase 4 this
Sunday 19th June or as soon after as is technically practical. This will
mean that anyone who has explicitly declined the
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Chris Jones roller...@sucs.org wrote:
It seems a bit backward to block my new contributions just because
nobody got around to talking to the OS folks yet...
There have been several attempts to engage with OS, if I remember
correctly, both by LWG and by
Hi,
could someone familiar with the area have a look at this border. It
looks wrong but I hesitate to armchair-fix it from thousands of miles away.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=11.0612lon=-85.2039zoom=14layers=M
(If you don't see a strange zig-zagging line then someone else has fixed
On 15 June 2011 14:41, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
There have been several attempts to engage with OS, if I remember
correctly, both by LWG and by individual mappers. They've been
resistant.
There would presumably be no need to engage with OS if LWG was happy
that the OS OpenData
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Chris Jones roller...@sucs.org wrote:
On 15/06/11 14:41, Richard Weait wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Chris Jones roller...@sucs.org wrote:
It seems a bit backward to block my new contributions just because
nobody got around to talking to the OS folks
Am 15.06.2011 16:17, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hi,
could someone familiar with the area have a look at this border. It
looks wrong but I hesitate to armchair-fix it from thousands of miles away.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=11.0612lon=-85.2039zoom=14layers=M
(If you don't see a
On 15/06/2011 14:41, Richard Weait wrote:
What seems backward to me is deciding to use a previously
and famously verboten source for your edits without being perfectly
clear that those edits are now permitted.
Where was it pronounced it was forbidden?
Under CC it was acceptable at the time of
On 15 June 2011 14:41, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Chris Jones roller...@sucs.org wrote:
It seems a bit backward to block my new contributions just because
nobody got around to talking to the OS folks yet...
There have been several attempts to
On 16 June 2011 01:47, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
It's only as the deadline draws near that those in favour of the change are
trying to put the blame on the mappers for there potentially being a
conflict. I find this irritating.
No, this isn't a new thing, this has pretty much
On Tuesday 14 June 2011 19:28:52 Pieren wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.netwrote:
Just as a factual point:
The Contributor Terms were posted to the mailing lists in September 2009
as far as I can see:
mc == Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz writes:
mc As per the implementation plan [1], we intend to move to phase 4
mc this Sunday 19th June or as soon after as is technically
mc practical. This will mean that anyone who has explicitly declined
mc the new contributor terms will no longer
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Eric Marsden eric.mars...@free.fr wrote:
compared to over 191,000 who now contribute under the new terms.
This is disingenuous communication,
+1.
Correct me if I am wrong but I remember a statement in last SOTM saying that
90% of the new accounts are never
On 15/06/2011 16:55, John Smith wrote:
On 16 June 2011 01:47, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
It's only as the deadline draws near that those in favour of the change are
trying to put the blame on the mappers for there potentially being a
conflict. I find this irritating.
No, this isn't
Eric Marsden wrote:
Reading odbl.de, 60% of users have accepted the new contributor terms
in Europe (40% in the USA, the proportion worldwide is not shown).
There 417k users. So (extrapolating) 200k have not accepted the
new terms and 190k have accepted.
Hopefully the decision on whether to
Richard Weait writes:
Please include real field work as part of your event. It is that real
field work that provides the very best, most current, data to a
mapper.
Just one caveat to Richard's note: It's reasonable to use aerial
photographs as a positional reference for your personal
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
[1] I suspect that when obvious bot edits are stripped out, the figure will
be a lot higher, especially in America. Certainly, looking around my local
area, the only significant non-relicensable objects are ways
Kate, I appreciate your dislike of all the worry about the license,
and I agree with it. My biggest take-away from being on the Open
Source Initiative board of directors for 13 years was that: community
matters; licenses don't. So here we have a situation where 20% of the
people think it's really
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 14:49 -0400, Josh Doe wrote:
Perhaps it is trivial, but I have yet to hear of anyone working on a
script or even pseudocode as to how the cleanup will be performed.
Seems like an important item to address IMHO.
-Josh
According to the implementation plan, sometime after
Am 14.06.2011 22:33, schrieb Michael Collinson:
I would emphasise there is currently no need to remove data from
the live database since the license is still CC-BY-SA.
I believe there is no urgency to do so until acceptances
have been maximised, local issues that have a near term solution
Am 15.06.2011 06:59, schrieb Russ Nelson:
Michael Collinson writes:
As per the implementation plan [1], we intend to move to phase 4 this
Sunday 19th June or as soon after as is technically practical. This will
mean that anyone who has explicitly declined the new contributor terms
- Original Message -
From: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
To: Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org; Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Announce: Beginning of Phase 4 of license change
process
Back in 2006 I wrote the following when it still wasn't clear what the
ODbL acceptance terms would be like:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 22:10, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com wrote:
If someone presents me with a boolean Do you allow relicensing under
the ODbL I'll have to say no because
- Original Message -
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com
To: OpenStreetMap blather talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:06 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Can I say yes to the ODbL if I can't account for
100%of my data?
Back in 2006 I wrote the following when
Exactly my own situation, except following poor advice I accepted the new
CT. Apparently it is not possible to change the CT status and my formal
request to have my suspect data deleted seems to have been ignored.
My recommendation is not to accept the CT, and reenter those items that you
did
If only there were a way to indicate the *source* of a given object...
This is obviously hindsight and doesn't help at this point in your
situation but seriously... The source=* tag: use it.
Toby
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:48 PM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Exactly my own
On 16 June 2011 04:54, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
As usual, the majority is right, and the minority (both 20%'s!) are
wrong. The question that we need to worry about is not the legal terms
of the license, but instead: will changing the license hurt the
community more than leaving it
On 6/15/2011 7:41 AM, Hillsman, Edward wrote:
One of my colleagues and I have completed a report on developing
multimodal trip planners. The report focuses on open-source software,
and open data sources such as OpenStreetMap and public transportation
data in GTFS format. The report is available
Heiko Jacobs-2 wrote:
Am 15.06.2011 06:59, schrieb Russ Nelson:
Michael Collinson writes:
As per the implementation plan [1], we intend to move to phase 4
this
Sunday 19th June or as soon after as is technically practical. This
will
mean that anyone who has explicitly
I have seen the tags AND_a_nosr_p=NUMBER and source=AND
associated with some nodes in OpenStreetMap. For example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/245622615/history
Would anyone know what the context for these tags is? I can't seem
to find documentation for the 'AND_a_nosr_p' tag,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AND
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Joseph Koshy joseph.ko...@gmail.comwrote:
I have seen the tags AND_a_nosr_p=NUMBER and source=AND
associated with some nodes in OpenStreetMap. For example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/245622615/history
Heiko Jacobs writes:
Am 15.06.2011 06:59, schrieb Russ Nelson:
Michael Collinson writes:
As per the implementation plan [1], we intend to move to phase 4 this
Sunday 19th June or as soon after as is technically practical. This
will
mean that anyone who has explicitly
Gary wrote...
I've been working on my suburb (Brunswick East), and keep coming across
tangled messes of ways caused by the boundary data effectively floating
above different ways. Roads are being connected to the boundary instead
of the the road. The road or other way has been moved to create a
- Original Message -
From: Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com
To: OpenStreetMap Learned Discussions t...@openstreetmap.org; OSM
Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org; Licensing and other
legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 2:30 AM
Subject:
On 15 June 2011 19:52, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
sorry to be pedantic, but when you say the second paragraph allows edits
submitted before the 17th of June 2011 under CC-BY-SA (i.e., by someone who
hadn't accepted the new CTs
at the time of submission) . to stay in
- Original Message -
From: Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com
To: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net; OSM Australian Talk List
talk-au@openstreetmap.org; Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:48 AM
Subject: Re: [talk-au]
- Original Message -
From: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
To: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org; Licensing and
other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 1:16 AM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com regarding
On 16 June 2011 07:48, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
On 15 June 2011 19:52, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
sorry to be pedantic, but when you say the second paragraph allows edits
submitted before the 17th of June 2011 under CC-BY-SA (i.e., by someone who
hadn't accepted
James; all I can say is that the paragraph in question was written by our
General Counsel specifically to allow existing contributions to stay in
place. I'm not a lawyer, so I can't comment on interpretation!
Regards
Ben
PS: TRS80? I'm old enough to have owned one when they were new :(
On
On 16/06/11 10:21, David Groom wrote:
I should have added how impressed I am with the generous attitude that
Nearmap has taken in regards to these past contributions, please pass my
thanks on to those concerned.
I second that. I'm delighted that I can now accept the new terms
without
Thanks for all the comments, I think I'll hold off. It does seem
unfortunate that there is no basic work-flow to convert a boundary into
a relation containing the ways that make it up. From what you've said
Nick merging nodes still keeps them as separate ways just stacked on top
of each other -
On 16 June 2011 15:01, Gary Gallagher g.null.dev...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for all the comments, I think I'll hold off. It does seem
unfortunate that there is no basic work-flow to convert a boundary into
a relation containing the ways that make it up. From what you've said
Nick merging nodes
Olás,
Vocês sabem quanto tempo leva para as atualizações feitas no OSM
aparecerem nos mapas da CloudMade?
A ERS-737 que liga Arroio do Padre à BR-116
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/114454930) está mapeada há
semanas, mas Arroio do Padre ainda aparece como não conectada.
Obrigado!
LMB
Oi gente
Cloudmade atualizando Navi maps cada 24 horas e outros servicos uma vez por
semana [0]
[0] http://support.cloudmade.com/answers/general
Aun Y. Johnsen
Sent from my iPad
On 15. juni 2011, at 10:05, Leandro Motta Barros lmbar...@gmail.com wrote:
Olás,
Vocês sabem quanto tempo leva
Obrigado!
Guilherme D'Agostin Donadel
Em 13 de junho de 2011 16:15, vitor vitor.geo...@gmail.com escreveu:
Oi Guilherme,
Para corrigir a rota, você deve clicar no link dela para ve-la no mapa da
Cloudmade, e aí ir movendo os pontos de partida/chegada até identificar em
qual ponto da rota
Sei la
Talvez eles tem um problema com o tile render? Tenta atualizar outros objetos
no area, por exemplo adicionar um posto gasolina e ver que este vai fica
atualizado.
Aun Y. Johnsen
Sent from my iPad
On 15. juni 2011, at 13:11, Leandro Motta Barros lmbar...@gmail.com wrote:
Obrigado pela
Seja bem-vindo Daniel!
Acho que se apresentando por aqui você é o primeiro de Fortaleza...
2011/6/15 Daniel Bessa polit...@gmail.com
Olá,
Sou Daniel Bessa de Fortaleza/CE e comecei a entender o OSM agora. Estou
tentando mapear a área onde moro pra aprender a utilizar as ferramentas.
Tem
Ferramentas, tá ai um dos calos do OSM!
O JOSM, para usar tem que fazer um curso :)
O Potlatch é umas das piores ferramentas em flash que eu ja vi :)
O Merkaartor, esse eu nunca consegui usar :/
Em 15 de junho de 2011 17:24, Claudomiro Nascimento Junior
claudom...@claudomiro.com escreveu:
Obrigado Claudomiro.
Alexandre, como comecei a usar agora, ainda não estou sentindo muita
falta de recursos. O Potlatch é bem intuitivo!
Mas já instalei o JOSM e consegui importar um GPX! Se for como você
falou, já me considero um vitorioso! hehe.
Att,
*Daniel Bessa*
Mapeadores,
Um amigo meu trabalho com Geoprocessamento no Governo do Ceará e ele me
disse que tem todas as escola estaduais georeferenciadas.
Alguém tem ideia de como podemos importar isso pro OSM? Já fizeram algo
parecido?
--
Att,
*Daniel Bessa*
http://coldlemon.wordpress.com
Oi Daniel,
As ferramentas tem diferentes curvas de aprendizado, sendo o JOSM a
ferramenta mais difícil e também mais poderosa de usar.
Qualquer dúvida, poste aqui ou no ajuda.mapaslivres.org.
Eu fiz umas edições a partir de imagens de satélite perto de Fortaleza para
corrigir rotas do Brasil
Oi Daniel,
Já foram feitas várias importações sim, mas elas devem ser feitas com muito
cuidado, para garantir que não haja sobreposição e que os dados importados
estão consistentes.
Você já tem a base? Tenta ver se consegue disponibilizar pra gente ver antes
de importar. Há bastante gente aqui
Hi !
ich wollte einmal fragen ob einer von Euch Erfahrung hinsichtlich
proxy-Server hat.
Es geht darum das in einer Anwendung die OSM-Karte Anwendung finden soll
und nun etwas an den Performance-Schrauben gedreht werden soll.
Dabei bin ich über einen Artikel zum Thema Proxy-Server bei
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com writes:
genau darum geht es doch: die osm-Datei in die Datenbank einlesen und
zum Rendern vorbereiten (Multipolygonrelationen parsen, Flächen
berechnen, Renderreihenfolge vorberechnen, etc.)
Muss man aber erstmal schaffen.
Die Anleitungen, die ich
Hallo,
Jan Tappenbeck wrote:
Dabei bin ich über einen Artikel zum Thema Proxy-Server bei DrWeb [1]
gestolpert und nun wollte ich fragen ob einer von Euch das schon einmal
gemacht hat ??
Das ist voelliger Bloedsinn, was in dem Artikel steht. Niemand, der
halbwegs Ahnung hat, wuerde einen
Hi,
Manuel Reimer wrote:
Was genau ist denn nun zu tun, um *lokal* eine PostgreSQL-DB laufen zu lassen?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapnik/PostGIS ist die Seite, die Du
suchst. (Je nachdem, welche Linux-Distribution Du hast, koennte es ein
ganz bisschen anders sein, z.B. ist bei den
Hi Jan,
klar ist das schneller - steht ja auch im Artikel drin:
Aus dem Browser-Cache sind Kacheln mit ca. 30ms sehr schnell geholt.
Der Server liefert sie auch noch recht flott innerhalb ca. 81ms.
Muss eine Kachel erst vom OSM-Server geholten werden, dauert es einige
hundert Millisekunden.
Am 15.06.2011 09:44, schrieb Walter Nordmann:
p.s. der Browser-Cache lässt sich ja als erfahrener Anwender mit z.B
shift-reload umgehen - kann man das bei einem internen Proxy auch? Da komm
ich etwas ins Schwimmen
natürlich, es kommt halt auf die richtige implementierung an. der proxy
muss
Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org writes:
Allerdings ist die primaere Motivation im Artikel die, dass man Tiles
ueber https ausliefern will.
Scheinbar. Ein Stückweit ist dieses Cachen dann vermutlich auch ein Umgehen
der Bot-Bremse der Tile-Server. Dennoch sehe ich hier eine große
Manuel Reimer wrote:
Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass sowas, wenn öffentlich betrieben, relativ schnell
OSM-Server-Seitig als Bot erkannt und abgeklemmt wird. Dürften
entschieden zu
viele Querys von einer einzigen IP werden.
ist das den nicht auch bei vielen Netzwerken ohne Proxy der Fall?
Lokal
Am 15. Juni 2011 09:36 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Muss ich die Küstenlinien
und die ganzen anderen großen Files laden, wenn ich ein Gebiet rendern
will,
welches eigentlich fernab einer Küstenlinie ist?
Nein, in dem Fall aenderst Du einfach die Hintergrundfarbe der Karte (Map
nachschlag: der tile-server beachtet wahrscheinlich auch noch die
Port-Nummer.
Mehrere Requests von einer IP-Adsresse aber unterschiedlichen Ports -
mehrere Rechner - OK
Viele Request von EINER IP-Adresse und dem selben Port - nanu? - blocken
und der Proxy geht halt für verschiedene lokale
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Was den User angeht: ich benutze einfach den normalen User und mache
den zum Datenbanksuperuser. Das funktioniert problemlos, ob es
Sicherheitslücken öffnet, weiss ich aber nicht genau.
Hi Martin,
das kommt halt auf das Umfeld an. Ein gut per Firewall
Walter Nordmann walter.nordmann at web.de writes:
und der Proxy geht halt für verschiedene lokale Rechner mit dem gleichen
Port raus: bad luck :(
Stimmt. Hat AFAIR schonmal zu Problemen geführt. Ist dann halt ein Fall von
Pech gehabt. Besser auf jedem Fall als Massendownloads. Vor kurzem haben
Hallo,
Am Dienstag 14 Juni 2011 12:51:41 schrieb Manuel Reimer:
Wolfgang wolfgang at ivkasogis.de writes:
Male 2 Linien. In der Logig des Programms legst du erst eine weiße Linie
und darunter eine schwarze dickere Linie fest. Dann sieht du schon, dass
die weiße Linie Vorrang vor der
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Wenn einem diese Sachen nun unter dem Hintern wegbroeseln, aergert man
sich: Haette ich sie mal damals gleich geloescht und neu gemacht, das
waer auch nicht mehr Arbeit gewesen (manchmal sogar weniger).
Eben! Ich mache das sogar bewußt, damit die
Moin!
Dank Faulheit und anderer Gründe hab ich erst heute die OpenCacleMap
entdeckt - und diese hat sogar die Radwanderwege eingetragen, die ich im
Sommer abfahren möchte.
Jetzt die Frage: kennt einer eine Location, auf der diese OpenCycleMap
als Garmin Image fertig zum DL angeboten wird?
Hallo,
On 06/15/2011 10:54 AM, Walter Nordmann wrote:
nachschlag: der tile-server beachtet wahrscheinlich auch noch die
Port-Nummer.
Nein.
Bye
Frederik
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hallo,
Am Mittwoch 15 Juni 2011 11:28:18 schrieb Sven Geggus:
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Einerseits wird das Problem durch die neuen Contributor Terms zwar
abgemildert, andererseits *haette* man das Problem ja gar nicht, wenn
man nicht einen Lizenzwechsel anstreben wuerde.
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hallo,
On 06/15/2011 10:54 AM, Walter Nordmann wrote:
nachschlag: der tile-server beachtet wahrscheinlich auch noch die
Port-Nummer.
Nein.
nee? dann kann ich mir auch nicht erklären, dass es bei grossen Netzwerken,
die hinter einem Gateway (Router) liegen, nicht
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
